Nikon S710 Canon SX110 Which is better? 20 points .

SX110 and Nikon S710

Personally recommend the S710 for a very simple reason, the ccd is large, the aperture is large, of course I just discussed these two machines with my friend, the friend who ranked first in this digital camera, and I was second last week.

The advantage of sx110 is the telephoto, but I think the telephoto image quality has dropped seriously, my friend thinks that the telephoto is convenient to go out, how simple it is, the focal length is what's going on, I personally understand that the focal length of more than 100 is enough, it is generally the most commonly used, of course, many people still want to be longer, except for the long focal length accident, all are S710 wins, you must know that Canon's top DC G10 is also this indicator. If Canon thinks that the top-of-the-line DC should have a telephoto, the G10 is not the current configuration, right?

So which manual operation has a larger range? Recommend a few others.

Ask this means that you really haven't played with a semi-automatic or full manual camera.,Full manual means that the aperture shutter can be adjusted.,That's basically all.。

Other cameras, forget it, now in our opinion, the S710 is basically the most powerful, and Canon's top DC G10 is also this parameter. It's time to be content.

Hoho, it's the first time I've bought it, but I mean the aperture and shutter range are bigger.

Regardless of the range of change in the aperture, or the maximum value of the aperture, it is the S710 that wins.

In fact, the aperture only needs to look at the maximum aperture, and the minimum aperture F8 and above levels are the same for DC of this size.

And the aperture is a reciprocal, 1 2 1 1 4 These three are exactly 1 4 minimum, that is, f4 is minimum, and then 1 is 2 times larger, 1 2 is 4 times larger, you see.

The SX110 has a wide range of subjects for large zoom shooting, but the disadvantages are not wide-angle; The S710 has good imaging, a wide aperture, and good performance, but the disadvantage is that the focal length is slightly shorter, and long-distance shooting is somewhat limited.

In fact, the two are not the same grade,Although SX110 is cheap,But it's still S710 cost-effective,Because the function is a lot better,But if you like telephoto, you still choose SX110,Of course, the image and overall performance are importantS710。

Brother Shen Jie kokoro, I'm quite objective like this.

Supplement: Both are all manual, don't look too much, it will be more difficult to choose the dazzling eyes.

Canon SX110

Pros:1Telephoto.

2.Macro. 3.Shutter speed.

Cons: Small. 2.No wide angle.

3.Low light sensitivity.

4.Poor portability.

Nikon S710 on the contrary.

The SX110 is good, and Canon has always convinced consumers with its manual features.

720 seems to have been discontinued a long time ago, if there is, I advise you to buy it, many people say that it is good, if it is gone, you have to choose one of the two, then there is only 710, o( o haha

The Canon A720is has been discontinued for almost a year, buy it now? There are many second-hand or parallel goods.

Nikon S710 just came out, the best one in the card machine, using CCD image stabilization, the effect is good. For home use, you can take a look at the S600, which also comes with image stabilization, which is more cost-effective.

I sell and repair digital cameras, and I can say responsibly: the Canon ixus870is digital camera is better, the Canon image sensor is quite stable, and the color reproduction is excellent. Canon is more cost-effective.

Canon is a professional manufacturer of cameras and digital cameras, and is the world's leading manufacturer of digital cameras. Every detail of the digital camera has been done in a way that no other manufacturer can match. (To be clear, I'm not Canon's to; It is just an answer based on more than 20 years of experience in camera use and maintenance and nearly 8 years of accumulation of digital technology. ）

Nikon S710 is good in the same situation.

Pros:1Manual operation Full manual support.

2.Image sensor size 1 inch.

3.Effective pixels: 14.5 million.

4.Shutter speed 1 2000 8 sec., 1 4000 1 15 sec. (high-speed continuous shooting).

5.High sensitivity Yes.

Cons: 1Macro difference.

2.Equivalent to 35mm focal length 28-101

3.The battery life is not as good as that of the Canon 870

Canon ixus980, the color is very accurate, and it tastes good when washed.

ixus980 is very good.

For other cameras, you can use Fujifilm's F200, which has a reputation for image quality.

Canon ixus980 is recommended

The imaging is great!

Effective pixels: 14.7 million pixels.

Optical zoom magnification: Optical zoom.

Digital zoom: 4x digital zoom.

There is a comparison function on the 365 day purchase, which can compare very detailed information, and the landlord can go there to see. Hope it helps!

Nikon S710 and Canon IXUS980 have reached 10 million pixels, but Nikon S710 is with a wide angle, IXUS980 does not, if you like to shoot landscapes, wide angle is essential, other functions of the card machine are similar, I personally think that Canon and Sony's card machine is better, Nikon's SLR is OK, the card machine is not good, it is recommended to use Canon's ixus870 (Suning price: about 2200) or ixus110 (about 2400), etc., The wide-angle plus tens of millions of pixels is enough for daily household use.

If it's demanding, let's get a SLR.

Don't listen to people's fools, Nikon's small DC is also good, I used Nikon's P4, and it's very good to take pictures.

And durable, it took three years to shoot more than 8,000 shots**, and it took two drops for the lens to malfunction, Canon's 980 is indeed a good machine.

You don't need to look at anything else, just compare the physical size of the CCD! Nowadays, the basic functions of the home DC are almost the same.

The larger the CCD, the better.

In terms of appearance, it's like buying clothes!

The overall performance of the Canon G10 is a little better, with 15 million pixels and 4x optical zoom, which are both slightly lower!

Canon G10 is OK, I just bought it and am using it, but the **compensation is not very useful, and I can't adapt to it. If the light is not good, I may have a problem with my skills. However, if you don't dislike the big one, buying an entry-level SLR is a better choice. Truth be told, the G10 is not small either.

The two features are pretty much the same.

Nikon S710 supports manual functions and is more cost-effective.

The Canon 980 is not cost-effective.

I just bought the Nikon S610, and the overall performance is not bad at all, and the value for money is very good.

Don't think about it, it's definitely 870, Nikon's card machine is not doing well, and Fuji's is not a grade.

If you're a woman, recommend Sony's T series and it's really good.

It works well during the day I bought a t77 for my girlfriend.

I personally like Canon's 980 110