Ask for help, understand the law and handle civil disputes, thank you!

Note one thing: "The woman later said that it was because there was too much water for mopping the floor".

This responsibility cannot be identified afterwards, and it is an accident, and the shopping mall generally has accident insurance in this regard.

The first is that the mall is fully responsible.

Secondly, according to his contract with the housekeeping company, the mall demanded some compensation from the housekeeper, and the compensation in this regard depends on how the housekeeper negotiated with your mother to pay.

I thought that the water caused the ground to slip, this was not called to the police in time, there was no identification, no one can tell this, don't go directly to negotiate with the injured yourself, you are only indirectly responsible, let the injured find the mall to negotiate.

As for whether the shopping mall wants to claim compensation from the housekeeping company, one is to look at the contract between the shopping mall and the housekeeping company, and the other is to see whether your mother has gross negligence or intentionality, no, you don't have to be liable. It is generally difficult to prove gross negligence or intent.

Hello, your mother went to work in the mall as an act of duty, and the responsibility for the woman's fall in the mall should be borne by herself or the mall, and it has nothing to do with your mother, although rest assured.

Summary. There are four ways to resolve civil disputes: (1) Negotiated settlement. On the basis of equality and voluntariness, the parties shall reach a settlement agreement through friendly consultation, mutual understanding and mutual concession, so as to resolve the dispute; (2) mediation and settlement; (3) arbitration settlement; (4) Litigation Resolution.

Hello! I'm in a civil dispute! I want you to help me out.

Good. Thank you.

There are four ways to resolve civil disputes: (1) Negotiation and settlement. On the basis of equality and voluntariness, the two parties reach a settlement agreement through friendly negotiation, mutual understanding and mutual concession, so as to resolve the dispute; (2) mediation and settlement; (3) Zhongzhen Yuhuai is resolved; (4) Litigation Resolution.

Legal basis: Article 122 of the Civil Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China provides that in civil disputes brought by the parties to the people's courts, where mediation is appropriate, mediation shall be carried out first, except where the parties refuse to settle the dispute. Re-training.

The first is the authenticity of the IOU, and if you cannot judge the authenticity of the loan, the other party must prove that the IOU was written by your father. The second is the issue of the statute of limitations, if there is a repayment time on the IOU, the other party must claim rights against you within two years after the repayment time expires, and if the two-year statute of limitations is exceeded, its rights are no longer protected by law. Thirdly, does the child of your father's friend have the right to claim rights on his father's behalf?

For example, if he is entrusted by his father, etc., if there is no corresponding entrustment formality, you can refuse to repay the debt to the child of your father's friend - even if the debt is true and the deadline has not expired, you should repay it to your father's friend instead of repaying it to his child.

If you inherit your father's estate, you should be liable to repay the loan to your father's friend within the scope of the inheritance, provided that the IOU is genuine and the statute of limitations has expired. If the above factors are uncertain, such as the other party cannot prove the authenticity of the IOU, or the time limit has expired, you may not lose the case.

Hello. First of all, the statute of limitations has expired, the statute of limitations in the Civil Procedure Law is 2 years, from 1999 to today, more than ten years have passed, if you and your father have not made any intention to admit or promise the debt, then, even if the debt was real, it is not protected by the law.

Secondly, this debt is your father's, not yours, and there is no legal such thing as a father's debt to the child, so even if this debt has to be repaid, it should be repaid in 2006 when you participated in the division of your father's estate.

Therefore, you are not obligated to repay your debts.

If your father has an estate and does have a debt on the IOU, then the heirs are required to repay it within the scope of the estate.

Are IOUs real?

Maybe it's already been returned, look to see if there's a receipt or something.

Is there a repayment date on the IOU?

1.If the unit does not pay for you to do professional and technical training and sign a training agreement to agree on the service period and liquidated damages, then you do not need to pay liquidated damages if you leave early. If the unit cannot provide evidence, it has no right to require you to pay liquidated damages.

2.There is no legal basis for the seizure of documents.

3. Submit the resignation letter to the unit in duplicate, one copy for the unit to sign and then you will keep it as evidence.

If the employer refuses to go through the resignation procedures 30 days after submitting the resignation letter and still requires you to pay training fees or liquidated damages, then you can apply for labor arbitration free of charge to the labor dispute arbitration commission of the local county and request the employer to go through the resignation procedures in accordance with the law.

If the employer requires you to pay liquidated damages for training, let the unit apply to the arbitration commission, because the unit has no sufficient basis, and the arbitration commission will not support it.

It's very simple, directly ask the unit to pay social security for you;

Liquidated damages are normal, as for how much can be negotiated;

If you do not make up the social security and refuse to give in to the liquidated damages, you can seek help from the labor inspectorate.