Why is this happening? Is what is said on the Internet wrong?

Some people say that a woman divides her hands a hundred times and as long as the man does not agree, she can't divide it, while a man only needs to divide it once is enough. I don't know what the probability of this sentence is, but it should be quite high, as it was said upstairs, in general, a man like you would not have good intentions, and this kind of man is not worth nostalgia. If you are already in another relationship, it is recommended that you be honest with him and seek his advice and advice, there is no need to ruin your current happiness for a relationship that has already passed.

Is there something he is worried about? If you don't feel good for him anymore, don't force yourself!

Theories are always just theories, and reality can be changed.

What did he show up for? Looking for you to get back together?

Like your name be a big woman.

The past is over, and women must be self-reliant.

Whatever he came back, you and him are in the past.

Don't think about him, be yourself, and face it calmly.

Men are some of the things that are available on earth.

Those who come are not good, and those who are good do not come.

Will the relationship that has ended be the same again?

Is it a taste to eat a plate of stir-fried dishes, reheat it overnight, and eat it again?

He was ruthless at the beginning, and now you can too.

Everything has its pros and cons, don't ask too much why. This will only lose yourself.

Have fun

Coincidence Do you think he wants to match you? Anyway, it is definitely not a good thing for a man to suddenly disappear and reappear.

That's a slut noticing that others aren't as good as you, so come back like a dog this kind of person don't pay attention to him anymore Understand! ~

It's really wrong. Really: [ zhēn de ]

Interpretation: Indeed; Reliable.

Citation: Ye Shengtao "Foreign Flag": If you go on like this, you are really digging your own grave, and it's too late to turn back now!

Kanji strokes: <>

synonyms: true, true.

First, it is true. Pronunciation: [ guǒ zhēn ].

Interpretation: Adverb, sure enough, to show facts.

Citation: Yang Shuo, "Secret Train": "When I climbed the hill, I really became a small forest. ”

Second, sure enough. Pronunciation: [ guǒ rán ].

Interpretation: Indicates that the outcome of the series of events is consistent with what is expected.

Citation: Chen Zheng and Yang Shuo "Secret Train": "Sure enough, soon after, Yixian County was liberated, and Jinzhou was also taken down. ”

To give you a counterexample, you can deduce ln(1)=ln(3-2)=ln3 ln2 like this, this conclusion is obviously not valid.

This can only be calculated by college students.

There are probably three categories of these people.

1. In order to conceal the truth, minimize their losses or get benefits from them.

2. Hypocrisy and grievances, and welcome horses.

3. I didn't know the real situation at first, and I didn't want to admit my mistakes.

In any case, it's just our own selfishness, which is something that each of us has, but sometimes we can't detect it.

Society makes people sophisticated.

People's hearts are separated from their stomachs, you are not him, of course I don't know why she wants to say black to white, be yourself, when you are strong enough, you say that you can say black and white with confidence. Come on, you can ask questions like this to prove that you are growing up.

Because human habits, if they grow up in such an environment, they will naturally be like this.

and unwilling to admit mistakes.

Will be more healthy records for you. , two kilometers.

Are you sure a lot of people know that's right?

Let the distance from the foot of the mountain to the top of the mountain be l, the speed of going up the mountain is v A, v B, and the speed of going down the mountain is 2 v A, 2v B, then you can get two equations: l v A = (l-400) v B, l v A = 400 v B + (l 2) 2v B, and solving the equation can get l = 2400

Don't be funny upstairs, okay? One equation with two unknowns?

In fact, the answer is 800 meters...

No, there should be two answers to this question, when A goes down the mountain, B is halfway up the mountain, but it is not said whether it is halfway up the mountain or halfway down the mountain, and the results calculated in the two cases should be different. This problem can be solved algebraically: let A go up the mountain speed is x, B go up the mountain speed y, the distance from the foot of the mountain to the top of the mountain z z, and B is on the way up the mountain when A goes down:

1）z÷x×

2）z-z÷x×y=400

Simplifying equation 1) yields x=3y, and the velocity of A is 3 times that of B. Substituting this result into Equation 2) gives z=600

The distance from the base of the mountain to the summit is 600 meters. , B is on the way down the mountain when A goes down the mountain:

1）（z÷x×

2）z-z÷x×y=400

Simplifying equation 1) gives 3 x y-2=, and gives x=. Substituting this result into Equation 2) yields z=2400

So one answer is 2400 meters, the other answer is 600 meters, and the question does not explicitly say that there is only one answer, and both results should be solved.

In addition, your mistake is that you take the difference of 400 meters between A and B as B's speed, and your formula is calculated as B is halfway up the mountain when A goes down the mountain, and B's speed is 400, which is not the same thing as the condition of the question, but this calculation can also calculate a correct number, I am really convinced, I don't know if you made up this formula according to the correct answer.

Love is a shared experience that takes place between two people – but to say that it is a shared experience does not mean that it causes equal repercussions in the two people involved.

There are those who love and those who are loved in the world, and these are two completely different types of people.

Often, the loved one is just the trigger for the kind of love that has been quietly stored in the lover's heart for a long time.

Everyone who is in love knows this to some extent. He felt in the depths of his soul that his love was a very lonely feeling. He gradually experienced a new, strange loneliness, and it was this discovery that made him miserable.

Whether it's right or wrong, you need a guideline that your behavior should follow and constantly revise according to real life.

It is impossible for a person who is indecisive to be likable, and a person who hovers between right and wrong is not as positive as a person who goes from wrong to right.

Dear, there is nothing wrong with thinking about it, but thinking about problems is too focused on personal feelings, and does not take into account the feelings of others, so as to develop into behavior, that is, to make people think that you are a self-righteous person who does not pay attention to the inner thoughts of others at all. I won't take care of people, so I don't want to have more relationships with you.

He doesn't fit into your way, find someone who adapts to you and likes you. This one already hates you, the more you entangle, the more annoying it becomes, and it's okay for you to ignore him.

Just press the letter "d" and you're good to go.

Tell us exactly what problem you want to solve. You can follow up.

Find out the problem and it's possible to know the answer.

If you can't hold the sand, it's better to raise it.

Your statement has a question, if else contains should be if else, and your whole Zen Min tribe attack is if oh.

Na2CO3 solution.

C(H+)=C(oh-)The hydrogen ions ionized from water in the aqueous solution of sodium carbonate exist in three forms of (H+, HCO3-, H2CO3), in which 2mol of hydrogen ions ionized by water are in 1mol of carbonic acid molecule. So.

c(oh-)=c(h+)+c(hco3-)+2c(h2co3)

This is the proton conservation formula, and according to the principle of conservation of protons, the coefficient before carbonation is 2