Who is stronger Nintendo or Microsoft?

Nintendo's performance in recent years has not been very good, and Microsoft has been in a relatively high position.

But when it comes to Xbox, I guess it's basically hard for Microsoft to take over the home gaming space.

European and American games released from Xbox basically sell very little, the publicity is strong, and the quality of the game is not good. Games published by Sony, Pro Evolution Soccer, Metal Gear Solid, Silent Hill, Final Fantasy and many more.

Microsoft obviously can't fight Japan, and Nintendo, a veteran game developer, has a lot of Nintendo fans paying attention to the next-generation Wii.

Microsoft is recognized as the most influential and powerful on the PC.

In the video game industry, to say that he has the most potential is to give him a step.

Microsoft, of course.

Nintendo just came out with a few home consoles.

And PC technology it still doesn't work.!!

Microsoft, of course.

But Microsoft is the overall strength.

And Nintendo is the strength of Chuangyi.

Both comprehensive strength and individual strength are not ...... of the same grade

However, Nintendo's creativity is not comparable to Microsoft's.

Very optimistic about Wii.

That's got to be Microsoft.

My photo album. My blog

These two vendors have never been disrupted to many others.

I want 10 and ahh

Microsoft is the big brother of global software, and 360 is still scolded in China, and the two are not at the same level.

360 can't catch up with one tail of Microsoft.

What you're asking isn't good at the same level.

The world knows Microsoft, but 360 is only relatively famous in China.

Just like Facebook and QQ. Not at all on one level. It's just that you've been exposed to more in China.

Apple, Apple is now the biggest tech company in the world. But Microsoft is still strong on the desktop operating system.

In terms of greatness, it's hard to say. This is a topic to tell.

As an aside, Apple and Microsoft are seen as rivals, but in this environment, they can promote their own progress and cater to the needs of consumers.

The Apple platform is difficult to accept for domestic users, thinking that its copyright and so on, a series are very strict.

Microsoft because of its special advantage, that is, open source, equivalent to the openness of DOS in the past compared to today's Apple, Microsoft has more advantages, but the problem brought by this advantage is viruses and vulnerabilities.

Apple is a leader in the new concept, while Microsoft is a popular receptive.

Most of the people in China are accustomed to chewing things, and few people generally accept them for trying them.

Apple's recognition in European and American countries is very high, stemming from its past philosophy, overthrowing authoritarianism, and liking to lead the fashion of young people.

The funny thing is that there are always times when a person who is tall and arrogant is arrogant. In recent years, Apple has been relatively arrogant, a bit like Microsoft back then, catering too much to people who are friendly to themselves, resulting in their own requirements for others.

Therefore, no one is greater, we need to recognize who is closer to the user.

Microsoft has been at the peak of XP since its time, Vista...And other follow-up products, innovation can't be talked about, but it will be updated and operated at a very slow pace, Apple likes cross-era development, young people may like this, so there is more support for Apple, who of us young people don't like things in the future?

Once Apple's products are launched, have you found that there are a lot of people following them? Including the software industry represented by Microsoft, the hardware industry of other companies?

Apple's excessive arrogance comes from his unique brand personality, everything has to be done by his own people, hardware and software are Apple's, and software companies that want to make an Apple platform must also be verified by Apple before they can be listed on the Apple platform.

After talking too much, come back, no one is strong or not, only the user's you, whose product are willing to use.

Microsoft, look at history.

TIMESNET is pushing Microsoft cloud servers, Windows Azure

I'll ask the downstairs owner first, what does Microsoft belong to, the network, Nintendo and Sony belong to video games, how can these two be pulled together, lz, you are making a big joke, right, in the video game, Sony is not bad, of course, Nintendo is not bad If you want to talk about the game system, then Sony is really the boss Nintendo's handheld nds As for how many, I don't know but the statement given by the manufacturer is that it can run Resident Evil Dead Silence DS is already the maximum function Resident Evil 2 and 3 are simply impossible Everyone can imagine if you say PSP is between PS and PS2 then NDS is between MD and PS NDS is impossible to surpass PSP Later, Nintendo's counterattack came out with a product called 3DS To be honest, it is really good, and the function has been greatly improved, but Sony is not vegetarian PSV will come out at the end of this year As for **, it is probably about 2000 yuan, which will not be so expensive The advent of PSV is nothing more than a heavy blow to Lao Ren The function of PSV can be compared with Xbox360 and PS3 LZ, do you say that PSV can do the 3DS of the old man, hehe, so Sony is the boss of the game industry, and it is a must

It's all better than Sega Hehe, sony, but the 360 network is extremely powerful.

Sony: I think the PS series is the best.

Sony without a doubt

It's expensive and the best sales!