Why is the performance of the built in browser on Android poor

Updated on technology 2024-04-13
3 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    Just use the IE browser to first put Thunderbolt or Express** can't you? You must ask why Maxthon browser does not have the functions and effects of IE, I haven't used this browser, I really don't know.

    1. Open the IE Selector Internet Options Security Custom level in Security In the drop-down list of settings, set "File**" to enable, "File**Auto Prompt" to disabled, and "Font**" to enable, and press OK and Apply after setting.

    2. Open the IE selection tool Internet Options Advanced In the list under the settings, remove the check box of "Check the signature of the **program", and check the "Allow the software to run or install, even if the signature is invalid", and then press the application to confirm.

    3. If the ** fault persists, run the input to make sure to open Group Policy, select User Configuration on the left Windows component InternetExplorer on the right side Double-click "Security Features" on the right side of "Restrict Files" On the right side there are three options "InternetExplorer Processes", "Process List", "All Processes" to see their status options, whether they are "not configured" or "disabled". If which configuration is Enabled, double-click the item to change it back to the "Not Configured" setting, and each item is determined by application. Finally, after the setup, restart your computer.

    If the fault persists, modify the registry to make IE. Run Regedit OK, open the Registry Locator [Hkey Current User Software Microsoft Windows CurrentVersion InternetSettings Zones 3] subkey, find and double-click the key-value item named "1803" in the window on the right, and change the value to "0" in the open dialog box (if it is already 0, don't change it) Restart your computer and the settings take effect.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    As we all know, Chrome and Android belong to two completely different teams at Google, and Android is an acquired project, and its native browser is a WebKit-based implementation, while Chrome has been working in the desktop field for a long time, and has only begun to make efforts on the mobile terminal in recent days.

    I believe that Chrome and Android will merge sooner or later, and Pichai is in charge of both departments at the same time, and some clues can be seen. Why is the action so slow? I think there are three reasons:

    The performance of the native browser implementation is not unacceptably bad, many Android users have found that the fluency of the native browser is actually better than Chrome, and the JS performance is acceptable, but its biggest sore point is actually compatibility with new standards such as HTML5. Compared with Chrome, due to the architecture decision, it needs more memory and CPU resources to achieve relatively smoothness, which is also caused by the fact that Chrome for Android has not been developed for a long time and has not been fully optimized. Native browsers are more suitable for the average hardware level of Android today than Chrome.

    As mentioned above, HTML5 compatibility is the biggest problem with native browsers, but is it a problem at the Android level? HTML5 is only a draft so far, mobile development is still dominated by Native, and Google has also done a lot of optimization work for Native development, so to speak, Android and even the entire mobile field have not entered the HTML5 era. There is no need to force Chrome to be HTML5 compatible.

    Google is actually not without Chrome's attempt to replace the native browser, such as Google's own sons, reflecting the third point. Chrome includes Google services, and Android and Google services are completely separated, and Google cannot add closed-source Chrome related implementations to Android Code Base. In the future, even if Chrome is likely to enter Android's code base, it will only be in the form of Chromium, and perhaps some version will provide WebView controls for apps to call based on Chromium in the future, I believe it is only a matter of time.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    Custom browsers generally perform well, except for the native flashed browser. Because that one only has the most basic functions, and no one maintains it.

Related questions
10 answers2024-04-13

1. Software installation program problems.

2. System problems. >>>More

18 answers2024-04-13

One of the most common causes of power consumption is that too much software is installed, which takes up too much memory on the phone, which reduces the available running memory of the newly installed software, and the operation is stuck and not smooth. The power consumption is fast, there are too many self-starting software, the software runs secretly in the background, occupying too much running memory, and the phone wastes a lot of power after running for a while. >>>More

5 answers2024-04-13

Not only Android Wear, but also Android Auto. Google's ambitions go beyond traditional mobile devices such as mobile phones. AndroidWear is mainly to complete Google's purpose of building an Android hardware ecosystem, but wearable devices can't run the whole Android, so Google will inevitably customize Androidwear. >>>More

7 answers2024-04-13

Google Chrome is not an IE kernel.,MS is the same kernel as Firefox.,But in general**QQ space** will not be affected,Unless you don't have Windows Media Player installed with Windows,Or you need to install Windows Media Player Firefox Plugin Setup,Just prompted me to install it automatically >>>More

3 answers2024-04-13

It is convenient for the next Internet browsing, and offline browsing of the web, and you can make the browsed web page open faster.