Blue Magic 970 and Nokia 5320 sound quality comparison?

The evaluation of 5320 is: [A very powerful but very shabby workmanship**smart phone]1Very powerful:

As the latest operating system version of Symbian, S60 third version FP2 latest platform, 5320's CPU is 369MHz, running memory RAM is the maximum when my machine is booted up, compared to N78 is 47M, N79 is 50M), the response is very fast, and the software resources are abundant; [The 5320 does not have a 3D accelerator, as if the 3D accelerator is only available on Nokia's high-end models, such as N96, N97, N85, ......】

2.The workmanship is very cold: the screen is small but okay, and the unbearable thing is that the screen is dusty and dirty; The keyboard is too hard, and it hurts to press your fingers; The shell fell off the paint after a few falls (it was so small that it was not visible); The overall machine feels very cold;

3.The sound quality is okay, I think, it's definitely better than the Blue Devil!! My previous *** was Samsung's, and after changing the 5320, I felt that the sound quality was a little worse, but it was very good!

5320The internal amplifier effect is similar to that of more than 500 pieces, and the external amplifier effect has only one speaker, which does not support stereo sound. All I know is that this Blue Devil doesn't know. But 5320 is recommended

First of all, Nokia's, and then very cost-effective. The latest system of the S60 with a lot of memory. And n-gage.

The Nokia 5320 has much better sound quality than the Blue Magic 970!!

5320's ** is much stronger than 970! Especially the inner put! Good Xpress Music machine, still smart, and extremely cost-effective.

The phone is very good, and the quality is good.

Advantages: large memory, exquisite workmanship;

Cons: CPU performance is insufficient, a bit heavy, no keypad;

Summary: The cost performance is good, and the easy office is enough.

5800 is slightly better, but if you just want to use your phone to listen to songs, it is recommended to buy a good ***. It is recommended to buy 5800, the function hall is powerful, not only **.

That's definitely 5800.,It's a specialized** mobile phone.。。

The sound quality is good.。。

5700 bar.,The external amplifier is all first-class.,Of course, the internal sound quality has nothing to say.。。

Then you better buy a professional ***, in the more than 1000 headphones, that is called enjoyment.

The sound quality is absolutely good, a classic ** mobile phone, with the suffix of the phone with XM.

What is an apple? What to compare with Nokia? Don't take the current sales as an example.

The sound quality of the 5320 is really good, especially the vocals. Apple's voice is muffled, and the voice is behind.

Nokia mobile phone quality really does not say.

The sound quality of these two is about the same, it's just a matter of headphones!! If you insist on asking which one is better,It's 5320.,I've used both.,Use 5320's headphones to plug in x6 on a sound quality.,X6 headphones are the same.。 However, the 5320's headphones sound less noisy than the X6.

The 5320** chip is said to be not very good, it's good to use the original headphones, isn't there an extension cable? I can't hear better with good headphones, and the bass is set in the next ttpod.

Nokia** headphones HS-45 + AD-57 X1 This is the headphone parameter, because the 5320xm XM is a **mobile phone in terms of processing is a little better than others. I hope to adopt.

Generally, if Xiaowu wants a good sound quality, they use Sennheiser MX360, and one is only more than a hundred, and the cost performance is good, but now it is discontinued, go to Taotao to see if you can find it

There is no comparison The key is to look at the headphones The headphones are bad Nothing iphoine can also be said to be an iPod, take the iPod and 5320 than a professional *** a mobile phone You see.

Hehe. This has something to do with the speaker inside and the chip.