If drinking at a party causes death, should the person who drinks with him be held responsible?

If it is because of the drinking at the party that causes death, then the person who drank with this person must of course bear the corresponding responsibility, which is to ask us to drink as little as possible and not to drink alcohol when we meet.

If you drink together, you can die. It is subject to civil liability. But the main responsibility lies with the drinker. He's an adult after all. Pay 70% of the people. And the people who drink at the same table pay about 30% of the responsibility.

Party the dead. Of course, the people who are in harmony have to take responsibility. It is incidental, not the primary responsibility. But there must be responsibility, so don't persuade people to drink at the wine table.

In recent years, it has often occurred that people have been persuaded to drink to death, and now they are all responsible for drinking.

The people who drink with them are also responsible.

Liability is required, and compensation is on a case-by-case basis. So don't discourage alcohol, friends.

The current rules are responsible, especially for those who persuade him to drink. Therefore, it is better not to advise on alcohol.

Now it is clearly stipulated that those who drink at gatherings and urge people to die are responsible.

People who drink together are responsible.

The latest laws are responsible.

If a person dies in a party due to drinking, the person who drinks with him is liable according to the law.

If a person dies by drinking at a party, the person who drinks at the same table will be held legally responsible.

Drinking at a party causes death, and the law now stipulates that the person who drinks should be held responsible.

If a person dies due to drinking at a party, the person who drinks the same drink shall be jointly and severally liable.

In this case, you should not be responsible, and the responsibility for the death caused by drinking at the party should be at the same table, and those who know that the other party cannot drink, or know that they have a medical history, and those who persuade others to die due to alcohol should be held responsible.

I think everyone's thoughts are different, drinking at a party is a happy thing, if drinking leads to death, I think the people who drink together should not be responsible, drinking is through their own consent, and it is not forced by others to let you drink, so I think the people who drink together should not be responsible.

If you don't know this drinker, you won't be held accountable for this. This does not mean that everyone in the drinking field is responsible, this situation can only show that the person who drinks is responsible for himself, if it causes death, this situation of drinking and accompanying wine is more or less responsible.

If the person at the table does not persuade the person to drink, the person at the same table is not responsible, and if there is an act of persuasion, the person who drinks must be responsible.

Drinking at a party kills people. The people who drink at the same table are responsible. There are quite a few precedents for this. A person who drinks alcohol is liable to bear the financial compensation. It is the responsibility to give the family of the deceased a certain amount of financial compensation.

Now it seems that it is stipulated that if the persuasion of alcohol leads to the death of a person due to drinking, there should be joint and several liability, and it depends on who is the guest at the party, and it depends on the specific situation, basically everyone present should have a certain responsibility.

As long as you don't have an invitation and you don't persuade you to drink.

You don't have responsibility.

What's more, if you don't know him, you certainly have no responsibility.

Hello friends, everyone who drinks and sits together is responsible, if one of them dies, they all have to bear the financial compensation, friend, drink less alcohol and drink more tea, I wish you a happy life.

Now there are new regulations. As long as you don't persuade to drink. Those who drink to death are responsible for themselves. You can consult a lawyer.

Some time ago, there was already such a case in the news that drinking at a party caused death, and the people who drank together should bear the corresponding responsibility.

Those who forcibly persuade people to drink, or where the convener fails to fulfill their responsibilities such as reminding them to help, they must bear some responsibility.

If someone dies as a result of drinking at a party, the person who eats at the same table will be held legally responsible.

If a person dies due to drinking at a party, the person who drinks with him is liable for financial compensation.

Yes, it is stipulated by law that there is responsibility and compensation.

Don't worry about different tables, no problem.

Guilty.

Whether or not the person who drank alcohol together is jointly and severally liable depends on whether there is fault. If there is fault, you need to be jointly and severally liable, and if there is no fault, you are not liable.

As people who drink at the same table, a legal relationship has in fact been established, and there is a legal duty of mutual reminder and care between them. Specifically, when drinking, other drinkers should generally bear the obligation to remind, dissuade, and notify them, and not let them drink excessively; After drinking, they should also bear the obligation to support, care and escort to ensure the personal safety of drinkers.

If a co-party fails to fulfil these obligations, it is an "omission".If the drinker suffers bodily injury or death, there is a causal relationship between the two. It was on this basis that the judge held the co-seater liable.

Legal basis:

Article 120 of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of ChinaWhere civil rights and interests are infringed, the infringed party has the right to request that the infringer bear tort liability.

Article 1165[Principle of Fault Liability]Where the actor infringes upon the civil rights and interests of others and causes harm due to his fault, he shall bear tort liability.

Where it is presumed that the actor is at fault in accordance with the provisions of law, and he cannot prove that he is not at fault, he shall bear tort liability.

If a person dies due to drinking at a party, if the person who drinks with him does not have the guidance act such as persuading him to drink, then he is not liable, but if the owner of the restaurant fails to fulfill his safety and security obligations, he needs to bear tort liability.

1. Article 24: Where neither the victim nor the perpetrator is at fault for the occurrence of the harm, both parties may share the losses based on the actual circumstances.

2. Article 37: Where managers of public places such as hotels, shopping malls, banks, stations, and entertainment venues, or organizers of mass activities, fail to fulfill their obligations to ensure safety and cause harm to others, they shall bear tort liability.

Where damage to others is caused by the conduct of a third party, the third party shall bear tort liability; If the manager or the organizer fails to fulfill the obligation to ensure safety, it shall bear the corresponding supplementary responsibility.