Ask for two English sentences, is this English one sentence or two or three sentences?

1.I should have been patient and I wouldn't have been mistaken. 【Meaning】see to see or do this, please combine this with context.

beyond my impatience is what should have been done more patiently.

attend to is roughly the same as paying attention to something similar.

2.I'm still feeling guilty about my self-centered behavior. Living in a fast-paced, busy city doesn't help you. [Meaning].

That is not the subject of the clause, but guides the phrase [living a busy life in a big, fast paced city] to be the subject of the whole parallel sentence, with can as a predicate and promote as a verb.

In fact, that can be omitted, and it becomes a gerund in the usual sense as the subject] above. I apologize for your understanding.

1.I should have been a little more patient and focused on what was right.

See here means to understand insight.

Beyond my impatience grooming see

Beyond is more than ......Above beyond my impatience and beyond my reach usage is similar to beyond my patience which can be understood as more patient.

attend to be attentive.

2. i still feel guilty of 1（being the self-centeredness ）and 2（that living a busy life in a big, fast paced city can promote).(Personal opinion, for reference only).

I felt guilty about my selfishness, and that guilt was exacerbated by living in a big, fast-paced city.

and note that 1() and 2() are juxtaposed, that refers to guilty, not self-centeredness

Conversely, if there is no and that below, it refers to self-centeredness.

It would have been. living a busy life in a big, fast paced city can promote the guilty

In the sentence, the guilty is replaced by that.

See, beyond something farther away, impatience irritating, inerrant=inerrable is absolutely right.

attend to note that here attend is an intransitive verb.

I should have had the courage to look into the distance to get rid of the restless attention, absolutely right.

Selfish, promote.

Living in a busy, fast-paced city. I still feel guilty about my selfishness.

After that, a participle is added as an adverbial.

The second sentence can be split into two sentences; i still feel guilty of being the self centeredness，i still feel that living。。。

I still think that living in a ... Cities are able to improve themselves

The first sentence is incomprehensible. The second sentence seems to be a juxtaposition, but the following of promote seems to be missing. That should be the guest after the feel, which translates to:

I still feel guilty about my self-centeredness and feel like living in a fast-paced metropolis can.

I should be able to see beyond my patience to participate in the "most unmistakable."

I still feel guilty about being self-centered, living a hectic life that can be lifted up in a fast-paced city.

This English sentence is grammatically analysed as a sentence with the main clause being: granny used to sayThe object clause is:

life is like walking in the snow because every step shows, where because every step shows is the reason adverbial clause in the object clause.

In terms of sentence structure and composition, this is a sentence, and the main clause is granny used to say"life is like walking in the snow, because every step shows...

The quotation marks are all the content of say, as an object.

The overall meaning is one sentence, and when analyzed carefully, it is three sentences, and my grandmother used to say, "Life is like walking in the snow." "Because every step is ......

It's a sentence that separates what my grandmother said. The same usage is true in Chinese?

Think of it as a sentence, what grandma said as well as an insertion.

Life, it's like walking in the snow," my grandmother always said, "Take a step, and it will leave a footprint." ”

The first sentence is a simple sentence, honest as the complement of the object The boy!

The second sentence is an object clause that omits the conjunction that

So both sentences are true.

Both sentences are true. It's just that the first sentence is a simple sentence, and the second sentence is a subordinate sentence.

there are different opinions among people as to( ①some people think that( ②

Here fill in the verb that, followed by a clause.

To + verb to form infinitive Here is the opinion of some people.

Indicates a noun phrase.

This sentence is to say:

It's like ......The same people have different points of view.

like a coin has two sides,there is a positive aspect and a negative aspect to( ③

Here is also a verb.

Like there are two sides to a coin, there are always positive and negative sides that we need to [ ]as a result,(

Fill in your own opinion here.

It's what you think is the difference in the positive and negative sides of the equation.

Hope this helps (*.)

The first sentence means that this is man.

The second indication should be incorrect, at least the same should be preceded by the

In the second question, what acts as an object after look like in the sentence, so that cannot be used

too...

to...There is a negative meaning, so it should be the opposite of what you understand.

fulltaxdeductions

deduction

It refers to the provision, not the deduction of tax, full

tax stands for non-tax deduction, so it is pre-tax.

It doesn't feel like it's true.

The first sentence is not true, and the second sentence is correct.

Please note: the inflection of the verb ing form is the verb archetype + ing, so broking in the first sentence alone in terms of word formation is wrong, let alone grammar. Breaking is applied here.

Note that although the action here is in the perfect tense, the sentence indicates the state - the police found the person breaking into the house - so it is not necessary to complete the tense.

In addition, please note the usage of found: here found is followed by the object, the man and himself, so the following breaking and sitting are both components of the object complement, and the subject-verb relationship is formed between the object. If it is a verb-object relationship, it should be in the form of V-ed.

For example: I found one of my hand caught by a strangerHere the hand is caught.

As for sit and seat:

The difference between the two as verbs is as follows: sit is an intransitive verb meaning "to sit down", while seat is a transitive verb meaning "to sit down", just like a common phrase in spoken language - please be seated(You may be seated).

This is the same usage as dress, e.g. get yourself dressed(Get dressed).

So he found them seated at a tableThis statement is true, and you can understand it as passive. But it's best to know the ins and outs.

The first sentence is not correct, and the past participle is applied, and the police find that the man has broken into a house, and the breaking in has been completed.

The second sentence is correct He found himself sitting in a chair.

The first sentence should be breaking, and the second sentence is correct. Because seat is a transitive verb, such as seat youself, youself is the object of seat. And if there is no object after the seat, it means that the object is in advance, so it is necessary to use passive.

1.There are two scenarios.

When it is used to break, it means that the police have discovered that someone has burglied and the action has been completed.

When breaking, it means that the person is burglarizing and the action is ongoing.

2.This sentence is correct.

3.That's right, it's a fixed usage, be seated