Which is more reasonable, to spare the bad guys in order to save the good guys or to hurt the good g

Both are reasonable. But it depends on how well you punish the bad guys. Because in real life, in order to kill a bad person, many good people will die.

Apparently the former is better.

The reason is simple:

"Saving the good guys" is almost as important as "punishing the bad guys";

But there is a huge difference between "letting go of the bad guys" and "hurting the good guys".

If it's me, I'll save people first, after all, it's important to save people. Bad people will be rewarded one day.

I don't think there's a more reasonable one.

Reasonable, what is reasonable? What is a combination? What is reasonable?

According to Hegel, everything that is reasonable exists, and everything that exists is reasonable.

Both of these phenomena obviously exist, which is equivalent to asking you: which is more plausible? Or think the other way around, what kind of existence should not exist? Since it exists, it is reasonable, and because it already exists, it cannot be non-existent.

Nothing can be judged and analyzed with absolute thoughts, both are reasonable and unreasonable.

The former is more reasonable! The latter is not necessary! Think for yourself, isn't it!

I think it's more reasonable to write about letting go of the bad guys in order to save the good guys.

Suppose the qualities of the person making the decision are not yet determined. If you choose the former, there will be one more good person in the world who thinks about the interests of others; If you choose the latter, there will be one more bad person in the world who does not hesitate to harm others to achieve their goals. So which do you say is more reasonable?

The former conforms to traditional Western values and the latter conforms to traditional Eastern values.

Uncle police officers seem to be pre-election.

Who do you think is a good person and who is a bad person, and others think you are a good person or a bad person.

Summary. Being a bad guy can only make a profit for a while, but it may be an enemy of others. Especially the bad guys who are enemies of the people are doomed to failure.

The difference is who seeks the interests of the people, those who do things for the common people or the majority of people are good people, and those who do not hesitate to harm the interests of the people for the interests of themselves or a small circle are bad people. A person who does not have a great ability to harm or benefit the people in ordinary times is considered a good person as long as he works honestly and abides by the law. However, we must pay attention to the possibility of becoming bad, there is no absolute between good and bad, we must standardize people in the direction of the good in the system, and we must also pay attention to improving ourselves and distinguish between right and wrong.

To distinguish between good people and bad people, it takes a certain amount of knowledge and time to test, and it can often be analyzed by the people who come into contact with them, such as whether the friends they make are legitimate, such as how they treat relatives and friends. A lot of bad people like to disguise themselves and can't violate the law and morality because of small favors.

The bad guy is the strong man who chooses to be the bad guy, and the good guy is the strong man who chooses to be a good guy, so the main purpose of the pants Zhou Tong Taji is to be a strong man, and he doesn't care about the difference between good guys and bad guys, right?

Being a bad guy can only make a profit for a while, but it may be an enemy of others. Especially the bad guys who are enemies of the people are doomed to failure. The difference is who seeks the interests of the people, those who do things for the common people or the majority of people are good people, and those who do not hesitate to harm the interests of the people for the interests of themselves or a small circle are bad people.

Mo Hong usually has no great ability to harm or benefit the people, as long as he works honestly and abides by the law, he is also a good person. However, we must pay attention to the possibility of becoming bad, there is no absolute between good and bad, we must standardize people in the direction of the good in the system, and we must also pay attention to improving ourselves and distinguish between right and wrong. To distinguish between good people and bad people, it takes a certain amount of knowledge and time to test, and it can often be analyzed by the people who come into contact with them, such as whether the friends they make are legitimate, and how they treat relatives and friends.

Many bad guys like to disguise themselves, and they can't violate the law and morality because of small favors.

The bad guy brother is the strong man who chooses to be a bad guy, and the good guy is the strong man who chooses to be a good man, then his main purpose is to be a strong man, not to envy the good guy, the bad guy, this sentence, for the bad guy is right, it is the bad guy's thinking.

A person thinks that the bad guy is powerful and wants to be a bright person in the bad, and later thinks that a good guy can also be a strong person who disturbs the training of the strong, and wants to be a good person, then his main thing is to be a strong person, and he doesn't care about the difference between good and bad, right?

Am I talking about this man's mind right?

A person who thinks that bad people are powerful and wants to be a bad person, and later thinks that a good person can also be a strong and weak person, and he wants to be a good person, then his main thing is to be a strong person, and he doesn't care about the difference between good and bad, no

Bad people, and good people, can become strong, he chose to be a good person to become a strong person, he thought about it. <>

Relatives and bad people and good people can become strong, and he chose to be a good person and become a strong man, which is a good idea. It's about being a good person. <>

Dear, take a look at it, I hope mine can help you, I wish you a happy and happy day, oh <>

Compare the heart] [compare the heart] [compare the heart].

Under the epidemic, imagine if your company has not paid wages for two months, and it has not been paid years ago, and the wages have been delayed, not paid, and symbolically given some living expenses, what should you do? The company did not explicitly say that it would dismiss the employee, but kept emphasizing the company's difficulties. How do you cope?

Instead of spending time on a half-dead company, why not actively look for the next home? Voluntary resignation? Don't you want your salary?

Recently, a lady in the same group asked for help, what should I do? Where is the company approached?

The first reaction, I may do the above, I think I am unlucky, I have someone, but I was woken up by a group of friends.

First of all, this is an industry unicorn, and its company feels that it is actually quite rubbish. This happened before the pandemic, when the company was in arrears of wages to its employees.

Second, the company did not and did not explicitly want to lay off employees.

Third, the company will pay a symbolic living allowance.

It is true that the company's behavior wants you to resign voluntarily, and he does not need to pay any compensation, not even the wages owed.

Treat the bad guys with the right attitude, and you have to be worse than the bad guys to protect yourself.

First of all, the barefoot are not afraid of wearing shoes, any unicorn is useless, the bigger the company, the more afraid it is, you say that you want to solve it peacefully, or you will report the company for tax evasion, and it is useless that any company can withstand tax inspection, even if it is inadvertently reported. Unicorns are even more afraid, even if you write an article and post a meager forum, they will be afraid of you. Be tough, everything is solved, the weaker you are, the stronger he is.

Go directly to the boss in charge of the house, explain that you will leave with your salary, and if you don't make trouble first, you will not be able to solve the problem with anything.

If you really don't have the money, it's another matter, and the company that cheats on the wages of its employees must be stopped.

Actually, it's not to blame, just blame yourself for being too weak. Complaints are the most subordinate.

Hello dear, I'm glad to be able to answer for you.

First of all, there are no absolute good guys and bad guys in the world. To distinguish between good guys and bad guys, we need to put them in the established facts. I don't know how bad guys turn good guys into bad guys?

When bad people and people around them accuse good people, do they already have an established fact that good people do bad things? Man is a thinking animal. Although it is inevitable that external factors affect it, it is the good people themselves who make mistakes in the end, and when they make mistakes, they also think through their brains.

Therefore, I think good people should think more and be knowledgeable.

I hope mine can help you and have a great life!

No one is born a bad person, but they make different choices when they encounter problems, so they distinguish bad people and good people, good people may not always be good, and bad people may not always be bad.

No one is born a bad person, it may be influenced by the environment or other factors.

Have you ever heard that good people don't live long (paid) lives, and bad guys are left behind for a thousand years!!