Wandering between law and morality, outside of law and morality, how do I act?

Never mind. Conforming to the law does not mean being ethical, and being ethical does not mean conforming to the law. However, most of them coincide. Morality is different for everyone and everywhere, there are no strict boundaries and standards, but the law is serious and must be there.

Both morality and law are rules formed in order to maintain a good social order. The scope of law is broader, and the scope of morality is narrower. A violation of morality does not necessarily violate the law.

Breaking the law must be violating morality. Therefore, the law is the bottom line of civil social life, and morality is a higher standard and the promotion of social life for the whole people. So it is often said:

Moral conscience, the bottom line of the law.

Having a moral conscience means holding ourselves to a higher standard of experience. Figures who have a certain role in guiding the public are often measured by their moral conscience. Of course, if there is a violation of moral conscience, it is generally condemned.

However, this condemnation is also very powerful. People who have the role of guiding the public must pay more attention to moral self-cultivation, which is also a good attitude to be responsible for social development. Moral conscience is to have good moral character and have a good awareness of one's words and deeds.

People with a public guide should not think that this is unfair. This happens to be for greater fairness.

The bottom line of the law is the last line of defense to ensure the normal operation of society. As long as they are social citizens, without exception. No matter how high the position is, the weight is heavy.

Everyone is equal before the law. In ancient times, there was a saying that "the punishment is not a sergeant doctor". This phrase is often misunderstood by us as:

Criminal law should not be imposed on the upper echelons**. In fact, the original meaning of this sentence is: the scholar class should be more noisy to demand themselves with moral conscience, and it is unreasonable to violate morality, let alone violate the criminal law.

"Punishment is not a sergeant" is an encouragement to the scholarly class: with your consciousness, you should not violate morality, and you must not violate the criminal law.

Ethics and law are linked.

Moral and legal ruptures are both rules and norms that govern people's behavior, and both are the basis of social order and normal life. Moral norms are the intangible norms formed by people in long-term social life, and they are a standard for regulating and evaluating behaviors. Laws, on the other hand, are formal rules established by state power, and are the strong norms of people's behavior. The relationship between the two is interdependent and mutually reinforcing.

Differences and connections between moral and legal laws:

1. The difference between morality and law.

Ethics is an invisible norm, and its implementation is mainly personal self-discipline, without the coercive force of law; Legal norms are norms formulated by the state, and their enforcement subjects are state organs and have coercive force.

2. The connection between morality and law.

Ethics and law are both social norms, and they interact and check each other. Moral norms and legal norms have the same basis of values and codes of conduct, and they both exist to maintain social order and safeguard the public interest.

3. The interaction between morality and law.

Ethics are the basis of legal norms, and legal norms are a necessary supplement to moral norms. In addition to legal norms, the binding force of ethical norms is more important. In practice, the enforcement of ethical norms is usually precedent, while the enforcement of legal norms is subsequent.

Morality and law are both social norms, and they are both related and different, interact with each other, check each other, and jointly maintain social order and public interests. <>

When there is a conflict between morality and law, the functions of morality and law will fail to a certain extent, which will lead to social disharmony and affect social stability and development.

1. There are many conflicts between law and morality, mainly in two aspects: first, the evaluation standards and value orientations of morality and law are different; The second is the limitations of the law itself.

2. The evaluation standards of law and morality are different. Morality is a form of adjustment in the social adjustment system, which is the sum of people's feelings, opinions, norms and principles about good and evil, beauty and ugliness, justice and injustice, honor and shame, justice and partiality.

3. Law and morality can be said to be very different in terms of evaluation standards, the law's evaluation of behavior is legal or illegal, and morality's evaluation of behavior is good or evil, good and evil come from people's inner judgment, different people or different classes, groups or strata do not have a recognized, unified scale and standard for moral good and evil, often people speak differently, usually only relative moral good and evil but no absolute good and evil.

4. The law often reflects the moral outlook of the dominant or dominant interest class or group in the society, which is in line with the basic moral values of the public to a certain extent, and the standard of the law is objective and unified, once the law is passed and promulgated and implemented, its standards are unified and must be observed.

5. Therefore, in the implementation of the law and the evaluation of legal acts, even if the legal evaluation is legal or illegal in accordance with the law, according to different moral evaluations, people of different classes will make different evaluations in morality, and this kind of evaluation that is different from the legal evaluation usually leads to the conflict between law and morality.

6. Legal and moral values are different. For example, morality requires courage in the face of justice, but although the law encourages acts of righteousness and courage, it holds that people who do not have a specific profession have no obligation to help in special circumstances, and will not impose legal liability on those who do not act bravely. It can be seen from the above different value orientations of law and morality:

Morality treats people as people in the church, hoping that people will be altruistic and selfless, and pursue nobility; The law is based on the assumption of homo economicus, which holds that man is selfish, seeking efficiency and stability, as well as convenience in use. Therefore, morally advocacy is not necessarily prescribed by law.

Why morality and law are likely to conflict.

Hello, if you want to dissolve the cohabitation relationship, you can no longer communicate, if there is a dispute over child support or property, you can sue the court to resolve it, as for the damage of multiple miscarriages, and the man's indiscretion, you can't claim compensation.

Is there a way to get a middle point?

I can only blame myself for having a blind reply:

Your question depends on whether the other party is at fault. The current legal provisions are not clear, but you can try to claim a claim through legal means. Like you, you can be exempted from ** fee, but you need to bear the court's acceptance fee and case handling fees.

Why do you disagree? I'm confused!!

Is it true that the law does not take my situation into account? My rights and interests cannot be guaranteed!

Isn't the illness I was left with during that time a condition for a claim also a claim?

Legally, it is really impossible to hold him accountable, so let's learn a lesson later.

If the illness is caused by miscarriage, the other party can be required to compensate for it, because the other party should bear half of the responsibility.

Because the law does not support cohabitation, its consequences are not protected.

Explain, if you meet the statutory marriage regulations and are both unmarried, you are in a cohabitation relationship, not an illegal cohabitation relationship.

If there is a more serious illness as a result, appropriate requests for care may be considered, but this is limited. After all, whether or not to be legally married is a very important issue, and hukou is also an obstacle to whether or not to get married.

If there is a dispute over child support or property, you can file a lawsuit with the court to resolve it, but as for the damage caused by multiple miscarriages and the husband's inattentiveness, you cannot claim compensation.

Ethics and law are interconnected. They all belong to the superstructure and all serve a certain economic base. They are two important means of social regulation and control, and since mankind entered the civilized society, any society cannot but rely on these two means at the same time when establishing and maintaining order, but it is only a little biased.

The two complement each other, promote each other, and promote each other. The relationship is embodied in:

1. Law is an effective means of disseminating morality. Morality can be divided into two categories: the first is the morality required by social order, that is, the "minimum morality" that is indispensable for a society to maintain, such as not violently harming others, not using fraud to seek rights and interests, and not endangering public safety; The second category includes principles that contribute to improving the quality of life and fostering close relationships between people, such as fraternity and selflessness.

2. Morality is the evaluation standard and driving force of law, and it is a useful supplement to law. First, the law should contain a minimum of morality. A law without a moral basis is a kind of "evil law" that cannot be respected and consciously obeyed by people.

Second, morality has a guarantee effect on the implementation of the law. "Nothing is enough to be good enough for government, and nothing is enough for yourself." The enhancement of the professional ethics of law enforcers and the strengthening of the legal awareness and moral concepts of law-abiding personnel all play a positive role in the implementation of the law.

Third, morality complements the law. Moral adjustment plays a complementary role in those that are not suitable for adjustment by law, or that should be adjusted by law but are "not available" due to the lag of legislation.

3. Ethics and law are transformed into each other in some cases. Morality, which emerges as society develops, is considered to be very important to society and is in danger of being violated on a regular basis, and it is possible for the legislator to incorporate them into the law. Conversely, certain acts that were previously considered immoral and therefore prohibited by law may be withdrawn from the legal field and turned into moral adjustment.

In short, law and morality are different from each other, and they cannot be substituted for each other, confused, or abandoned, so a single model of rule of law or a single model of rule of virtue is inevitably defective; At the same time, law and morality are interrelated, complementary in function, and both are important means of social regulation, which makes it possible to rule by virtue and law.

To sum up, ideology and morality have this dialectical unity relationship with the legal foundation, and they are interdependent and mutually restrictive, and they are inseparable.

Legal: B had a duty to help in the specific circumstances at that time, so it was a crime of negligence for him to turn around, which was reflected in previous cases.

If there is indeed evidence that B did not know about the poison that A drank, then A has no moral or legal problem.

1 Moral perspective: B has not fulfilled his duty to care for the life and health of others.

2 Legal perspective: This aspect is difficult to talk about, because the criminal law has not been violated, because B is unaware.

1. Morality is something that human beings have evolved through certain conventions and through historical development. Morality is created for the sake of people's better lives. What does it say about justice?

What is Love? What is Friendship? What is Goodness?

How to do good? How to Maintain Justice? Morality is formed to make people's lives better and more harmonious.

Morality is not compulsory.

2. Laws are enforced by the state. Laws are made according to morality.

3. The relationship between morality and law is the relationship between inclusion and inclusion. The development of morality can promote the progress of law, and the progress of law and norms can lead to the improvement of people's moral level.

The two complement each other and complement each other.