If an adult but unmarried child borrows money from his parents to buy a house, do they have to pay i

If it is borrowed, anyone who borrows money must be repaid, and your parents did not say that the money was given to you, then you have to repay the money, and you don't have to pay it back if you give it clearly.

I am an adult, but my unmarried children have borrowed money from their parents, so when they have to wait for their economic ability to reach a certain level, of course, they have to pay it back, after all, it is not easy for their parents to work hard to earn money, and they should return it to him, so that they can support their old age is filial piety.

It depends on what the parents mean.

If your parents explicitly say that the money was lent to you, it must be repaid.

If your parents say that the money is for you and you don't need to pay it back, then you can not pay it back.

Of course, if you are financially able, you can return it to your parents.

Because the older the parents, the lower the earning power, but the more places to spend money, the more money can be safe.

Of course, the adult but unmarried children who borrow money to buy a house must be repaid, if he does not pay it back, do not lend it to him, if he is willing to write an IOU, and promise to return it when then you can lend him money for emergency.

Since the money was asked for in the name of borrowing, of course it had to be repaid. If your parents say they want to give it to you, you don't have to pay it back.

Generally speaking, if the parents are in good condition, the money does not have to be repaid. Of course, you have to make a noise, don't cause trouble to your parents.

This depends on your consciousness, if you borrow money from your parents, you should actually pay it back. It's not what your parents are going to give you.

If the money borrowed between the children and their parents, I personally don't feel that they need to pay it back, after all, the money of the parents will be the children's in the future, so if you like this, you definitely don't need to pay it back.

The borrowed money must be repaid, so is it in line with you to borrow and repay, I think it must be repaid, in fact, you have to pay back the money you see your parents.

Hello, I think generally speaking, it should be well, and you don't have to pay it back, but uh, in theory, it's actually an adult after all.

It depends on the child's own thoughts, and it is estimated that the parents did not intend to ask him to pay back the money when they borrowed it, but if the child has money, it is better to give it to his parents.

It depends on what the parents think, and if the parents want to ask their children to pay it back, then the children will pay it back.

If an adult but unmarried child borrows the money of his parents to buy a house, if the parents have the financial conditions, he can not repay the line.

Legal Analysis: Generally speaking, whoever the borrower is, the repayer is. In other words, the son and daughter-in-law are not responsible for repayment.

However, if the debt is for the common living expenses of the family, then the family members are jointly and severally liable. That is, if they live together, then this debt is a family debt, and all members are obliged to repay it. The premise is to live together.

Legal basis: Civil Code of the People's Republic of China

Article 667 A loan contract is a contract in which the borrower borrows money from the lender and returns the loan at maturity and pays interest.

Article 668: The loan contract shall be in written form, unless otherwise agreed upon between natural persons. The content of the loan contract generally includes the type of loan, currency, purpose, amount, interest rate, term and repayment method.

Parents lend money to their son to get married, who should pay back.

Hello! I'm glad to answer for you Oh hello, dear, in fact, I have encountered the same problem, generally speaking, the son repays in the end, of course, it also depends on whether there is the ability to repay, if the parents have the ability, they can naturally help, but if the parents are not able to repay, they must be repaid by the son. But kiss you can discuss with your son, if you and his father have the ability to repay, you can repay, but if you don't have the ability, you can let your son repay, because you borrowed this money, after all, it is used for your son's marriage, you didn't use it privately Oh, because they are all a family, just talk about things, you can discuss with your son, because the marriage borrowed who is how much and how much, how can we make a plan for this money, your son must also be able to understand you, Because after all, you don't have the ability to repay, and when you are older, does he still have the ability to repay?

After all, he is still making money, so he can tell the person in arrears to postpone the repayment, and it is okay to pay him back when he has money.

Summary. Parents only have the obligation to raise their minor children, but not to raise their adult children.

Parents are not obliged to buy a house for their son, get married.

Hello, no obligation.

According to our law, parents are only obliged to raise their children until they are 18 years old.

Article 1068 of the Civil Code: Parents have the right and duty to educate and protect their minor children.

Parents only have the obligation to raise their minor children, but not to raise their adult children.

When the child is an adult, he is looking for a girlfriend and wants to buy a house and a car.

You are not obligated to buy a house and a car for your children.

How much money I give as a father is not something I can give.

Yes. You can give, or you don't.

The money is yours, the decision is yours to give it or not.

Thank you. I understand.

Okay thank you.

Whoever the borrower is, the repayer is whoever he is. In other words, the son and daughter-in-law are not responsible for repayment. However, the law also stipulates that if the debt is for the expenses of the family's common living expenses, then the family members are responsible for repaying the debt.

That is, if they live together, then this debt is a family debt, and all family members are obliged to bear the debt, but the premise of joint responsibility for repayment is to live together.

1. If the parents' living standards fall below the local average because of the repayment of debts, then the son and daughter-in-law are required to bear the responsibility of support and repay the debts within a certain range.

2. Legally speaking, the loan of the man's parents before marriage does not need to be repaid by the man's wife. This is a premarital debt that belongs to the husband and has nothing to do with the wife. Even when the parties divorce, this part of the debt will be attributed to the man's premarital debts and does not need to be borne by the woman.

1. Is the money borrowed by the parents for their son's marriage a joint debt of the husband and wife?

1. If the debt occurs during the marriage, the debt is a joint debt of the husband and wife and needs to be repaid together without a special written agreement in advance.

2. In the case of divorce, the two parties can agree to divide the debt, and one party can be agreed to bear the joint debt, but this agreement cannot oppose the legitimate rights and interests of a third party, and the creditor can sue both parties to the divorce to claim creditor's rights.

Although the son and daughter-in-law are not responsible for repayment. However, the law also stipulates that if the debt is for the expenses of the family's common living expenses, then the family members are responsible for repaying the debt.

Legal basis

Civil Code of the People's Republic of China

Article 118.

Civil entities enjoy creditor's rights in accordance with law. A creditor's right is the right of the obligee to request a specific obligor to do or not to do a certain act due to contract, tort, management without cause, unjust enrichment and other provisions of the law.

Article 517.

If there are two or more creditors, the subject matter can be divided, and each of them enjoys the creditor's right according to their share, it is a creditor's right according to their share; If there are two or more debtors, the subject matter can be divided, and if each of them bears the debt according to their share, it is a debt according to their shares. Where it is difficult to determine the share of the creditor or the debtor by share, it shall be deemed that the share is the same.

Generally speaking, whoever the borrower is, the repayer is. In other words, the son and daughter-in-law are not responsible for repayment. However, if the debt is for the joint expenses of the family, then the family members are jointly and severally liable.

In other words, if Duan Jian lives together with Lingfeng, then this debt is a family debt, and all members are obliged to bear the responsibility of repayment. The premise is to live together.