At present, is culture or ability more important for rural village officials ?

On this issue, I think that as a village official, the importance of competence is significantly higher than the importance of culture。Generally speaking, if one village branch has the ability to lead the whole village to get rich together, and the other village branch is a college student, or even a master's degree or doctorate, who has no practical experience and only knows book knowledge, which is more worthy of everyone's support?

From the perspective of the connotation of "ability" and "culture", it should be the relationship between the former and the latter. A person's ability includes many aspects, such as judgment ability, comprehensive coordination ability, comprehensive writing ability, leadership ability, etc., but a person's cultural ability can only mean that he has read a lot of books and has a certain cultural literacy. Otherwise, it's hard to tell.

Other competencies that a leader should possess may be low, or simply insufficient. Therefore, a person's cultural qualities are only part of the overall ability.

In practice, a capable person and a person with only cultural qualities have different roles. If we use an analogy, a capable person is a "handsome guy" who can control the whole situation. If it is just a lack of culture, we can strengthen our own learning and improve our cultural quality.

They can be independent, but they can't take the whole situation as a whole. They can only do part of the job. Other defects take time to experience and are difficult to fix in a short period of time.

There is a village in our county, and the branch secretary does not know many words, but he is very capable. He led the people to develop paddy fields, process rice, and develop green agriculture, so that life was rich and colorful, and the peasants became rich. However, lacking in culture, he was employed as a university student village official, and the village had become a wealthy village.

As a village official, the ability is good, but the lack of culture is also a deficiency, and we should also find ways to make up for the shortcomings, so as to give full play to the maximum role of a person. Some new college students should learn from the veteran comrades in the villages, learn from their ability to handle and solve complex problems, and learn from their feelings of working for the people and doing businessStep to cultivate itself into a professional, multi-functional compound talent, to respond to the revitalization of the countryside. Contribute!

As we all know, after graduating from college students, many people like to return to their hometowns and become a "village official", after all, in the eyes of the villagers, college students are often educated. But anyone who has worked in the countryside knows that it is not so easy to work in the countryside, because to put it mildly, people in the countryside can be said to be mixed, there are all kinds of people, and not everyone will support your work. Therefore, being a village official in the countryside, if you don't have real skills, it will definitely not work.

Then some people may have this question, that is, to be a village official in the countryside, is culture more important, or ability is more important? Some people may say that this is simply a very stupid topic, because everyone knows that as a rural village official, culture and ability are very important. So if you have to compare the two, is culture more important, or ability is more important?

Next, Leng Yan will share with you my personal views to see whether culture is more important or ability is more important in Leng Yan's mind.

First of all, the cold eye can clearly give you my answer, that is, ability is more important. I believe that many people know that the so-called culture should actually belong to the category of theoretical knowledge, and ability should belong to the category of practice. In a cold view, being educated may only prove that you have read more, or that you have a wider horizon and have seen the world.

But it is undeniable that a literate person is not necessarily a very capable person, because in this society, there are too many people with low eyes. A literate person, if he has not experienced the beating of society, may not develop strong ability, and if you are a village official, it is impossible to gain a foothold without ability, let alone do a good job. And the talents honed from practice, they often have very strong ability, even if their cultural level is not very high, but if they are village officials, at least they can gain a foothold.

Therefore, from this point of view, I think that ability is obviously more important than culture. Because ability represents a person's strength, a person who has culture does not necessarily have strength, but a person who has the ability must have strength.

Of course, it is undeniable that culture is also very important for a person. Because culture often represents a person's upper limit, and ability represents a person's lower limit, if you want to be a village official, you can't just have culture, you can't just have ability, but you have to grasp both culture and ability, so that you can do a good job as a village official, lead the villagers to live a good life, and lead the villagers to get rich. In this way, you are a qualified rural village official.

Of course, if you have to compare which is more important, culture and ability, you think that ability is more important, because just as time is the only criterion for testing truth, ability is also a very important criterion for testing culture, so you think that ability is more important.

The culture of village officials is important, and the ability is secondary. Why do you say that, because the elite in the countryside have all gone out to work, and the rest are old, weak, sick and disabled. In order to seek stability and fairness, health and pension education, educated cadres, understand the law to rule the law of the village, to the law of administration, to the law for the people will be satisfied, so that the cadres with strong ability to the development of the city have hope

Cultures and abilities complement each other and are inseparable. Only by concretely applying the new culture and new knowledge of rural areas and agriculture to the construction and development of the new countryside and agriculture can the new culture and knowledge play a role, and only in the practice of rural and agricultural reform and development can the new culture of the new rural agriculture be continuously enriched. It should be emphasized that having a diploma does not mean being educated, and having influence does not mean having ability.

According to the current situation in the rural areas, it is necessary to have a sincere and selfless heart for the people, and culture can be strengthened to study, but ability and practical experience cannot be acquired overnight, and it is still accumulated by years and months. For example, the non-existent are: 1. Sincerity and selflessness, 2. Practical experience, and 3. High cultural knowledge.

In today's rural areas, the old and the young, do not need educated village officials, they need to have village officials who are really hard-working, truth-seeking and pragmatic, think more for the people, do more practical things for the people, and take the people's affairs as their own family affairs, and there are no trivial matters around the people.

I think experience is more important, after all, there are many rules and regulations for rural villagers' autonomy that cannot restrain them, and they are more predicated on the premise of dealing with problems, that is, ability is more important than culture, and ability is needed for dredging up and down rather than culture.

I am an authentic rural person, I think that although the village official culture is important, it must be a selfless person, a person who can lead the masses to get rich on behalf of the people, a person who does not waste national resources, a person who forgets his righteousness for profit, and a person who cannot use power for personal gain, but even if there is such a talent, it may not be reused!

As long as they do not seek personal gain, govern for the public, can solve problems for the masses, have leadership appeal, can lead the masses to get rich together, and seek wealth for the people, they are all good officials

My understanding of the countryside, should have culture is the first, rural all kinds of Mao Dun more, do not Dong law, will not mediate will only make Mao Dun upgraded, if you say ability, there are few capable, are those who have been at home for a long time The proportion is more, and there is no ability to go outside to break into the world as a village cadre!

Personally, I think that cultural ability must be both, and if there is no lack of anything, I am not worthy of being a village official, and the state should introduce policies to strictly control it, and then select outstanding civil servants or college students to serve in the village, or a combination of the two, that is, there is no lack of culture and no bad ability.

The most important thing is to have a true selfless heart! Learning culture is also for the sake of long-term ability, but sometimes the ability to deviate from the high level of culture is high, but it is ultimately a direction, so this is a pseudo-problem. If you are politically unqualified, the stronger your ability, the more dangerous it is.

Integrity, single-mindedness for the people is the most important, followed by ability, and then culture. For example, my village secretary is greedy for about 200 million yuan a year, and the gold concentrator in the village is under the control of him and his family, and the people have no benefit.

Now, of course, culture is important, and in the construction of new rural areas, it is not possible to copy the old routine without culture, so it is just a little bit, universities should have village officials, township officials, and rural management majors, and China will be better.

It doesn't matter, the important thing is to have a heart that really wants to do a good job in the countryside, and the second thing is the support of the superiors, and then the two points you said. Of course, there are very few that meet one point.

The best way out for rural areas is urbanization: the concept of family and clan in rural areas is very strong, and the development of various families and clans is unbalanced, so many village affairs are passive, it is difficult to do practical work, and they are basically to complete the tasks of townships and towns.

Both. Ability without culture follow-up is insufficient, vision is short, and culture without ability is not good! Our village has no culture, and we have been a village official for many years, and the village has 0 development!

The village cadres call him capable or incompetent, and he is educated or uneducated.

The most important thing is to look at the development of this village, without development, ability and culture are all decorations.

Culture is more important than competence because knowledge determines cognitive level and cognitive ability, and competence can be cultivated at work, while culture does not improve at work.

I think that as a village committee director, experience and ability are the most important, but it is more important to have a good atmosphere and environment, if there is a problem with the environment, no one can do it

Culture and ability are complementary to each other, and the relationship between building and building depends on his morality and benefit. At present, most of the village cadres are mainly engaged in personal interests. Moreover, they also entangled the following group of illiterate people who mainly took profit as leaders. What you want is to go up and check it, some people praise it, and some people praise the leader before you are satisfied.

In rural areas, of course, capacity is more important. If you want to develop a small world by virtue of culture or ability, you must have benign policy support.

Neither of these points you say is important.

It is important to have the virtue of serving the people wholeheartedly. There was not much culture, but the people obeyed him and admired him.

As for capacity, the main thing is the ability to serve the villagers. The more powerful the selfish, the more miserable the people are.

Rural village cadres must not only be educated, but also capable, but also have a clean and honest original intention to always seek benefits for the people! The three are perfectly possessed, and they can be called competent rural cadres in the new era! The original intention of the interests of the masses is the premise and foundation of a stable foothold, just like the cornerstone of a high-rise building!

Culture and ability determine how far you can go and how high you can go! However, if the original intention is lost, no matter how highly educated and capable you are, everything will be in vain! Even the higher the culture, the stronger the ability, and the greater the hidden danger!

Integrity, intelligence, and ability are selected. Of course, it is good to be elected as the foundation of the country and local development, but if you are highly educated and competent, and are members of the dark forces organization, after being elected, you will bring disaster to the country and the people, seek money and kill people, and the consequences are unpredictable.

Or is it more important to be competent. As a village official, if you want to make the peasants in your village rich, it all depends on the thinking ability of the village official. For example, if a capable village official can use the land of his village as a collective joint venture for his village.

You can use the land for planting and breeding, and you can also use grain for deep processing, so as to drive the people of the village to make green food and enter the market. Nowadays, whether it is a large or small city, the most scarce thing is green food.

Personally, I think that culture can be improved, but ability can't. Dealing with people is not something that can be solved by being educated. Ability in rural areas, experience, basic connections, and fairness are the key. It's not something that culture can solve.

Ability is more important, because now there are many highly educated college students, but most of them are either couriers or riders, or they don't like to play video games or stay at home, which is meaningless to the management and operation of the village.

In carrying out grassroots work in rural areas, ability is absolutely important! You must have the ability to make the complex things around you simple, and do the simple things perfectly. Culture is generally fine; What the common people look at is ability!

Ability and culture are both important, and this is a whole that needs to be unified, and both are indispensable. Ability is the fruit of cultural flowering, and culture can promote faster and higher quality fruits, but this culture is not just a diploma, not a few days of college you have everything, but a combination of practice and books on the Internet.

I think culture is very important, because since the liberation, people have always chosen people who feel that the village has high prestige, but they have never been out of poverty, and he has a high level of culture, he has rich scientific and technological resources and brains, and can apply the science and technology in his knowledge to help his peasant brothers and sisters make a fortune and change poverty.