Friends who know the law, please come in, thank you in advance for your help! ）

First of all, the company is responsible for the safety of the customer's consumption, and there is a direct causal relationship between the beating behavior and the consumption, even if it occurs outside the company's door. Therefore, it can be determined that you are acting in the course of duty, and the company needs to compensate.

Secondly, after the company has made compensation, it has the right to claim compensation from you. Because you caused the company's direct losses, and the beating was not instigated by the company.

Finally, after the company has paid compensation, it can be deducted from your salary. If there is any surplus, it shall be paid to you.

If the company does not give it, it can go to the labor bureau to apply for arbitration, and if it is not satisfied with the arbitration result, it can file a lawsuit with the court.

In addition, if you fight with a client, if the injuries are serious (more than minor), you may be prosecuted for intentional injury; If the injuries are minor, the public security organs may also give you a public security punishment.

1.If the guest hits me first, and the guest who hits outside the company, will the company be responsible for compensating the guest?

You are an employee of the company, and you beat the customer outside the company, of course, the company has to compensate.

2.Does the behavior of a customer who hits outside the company have anything to do with the company?

Ditto, related.

3.What are the odds of going to the labor bureau to engage in a company that does not pay wages? Can fighting outside the company be related to wages?

You beat the customer, and the company only paid the customer in advance on your behalf, which involves "fighting outside the company and wages", if you still have a balance between your salary after deducting the cost of compensation, the company should give it to you.

You are an employee of the company, and the law stipulates that the employee (you) infringes on a third party (guest) and is liable by the employer (company), so the company is obliged to compensate the guest, and you beat someone outside the company, because you are an employee of the company and have a relationship with the company, and the company is responsible for compensation.

The company can terminate the employment relationship with you if you seriously violate the company's rules and regulations. and where the circumstances are serious, they may be transferred to the public security and judicial organs for handling. If the company terminates the labor relationship, it should also settle the wages for you according to the regulations, and if you are not satisfied with this, you can go to the labor bureau to complain, apply for labor arbitration, and ask for the payment of wages.

If you fight, the company can punish you or fire you, but it has nothing to do with whether or not you are paid.

1. The company is responsible for compensation. You're at work, and because you're injured, you go straight to the company.

2. You are also at work and have a relationship with the company.

3. If the labor bureau or something is very time-consuming, it is better to talk to the company.

Outside the company, not during work, it is considered a personal grudge. It's going to work, it's related to the company.

If the employer does not pay the salary, it can apply for labor arbitration.

Suspected of injury, the public security organ punished.

Intentional injury does not constitute a minor injury, it is a public security incident, and the police can be mediated according to the situation, and the party who violates the public security law shall be fined, detained, or detained in accordance with the regulations. Your current situation is private, and the two parties negotiate to deal with it, and your behavior is a personal behavior, and you are personally responsible. You should have violated the company's management regulations, and you basically can't get paid according to the rules and regulations.

Besides, you didn't negotiate the fight.

The company is not responsible, and the salary is not affected.

According to the law, everything you do after work has nothing to do with the company, so the company doesn't have to pay at all. And if you are beaten at work, the company should pay you for the loss and wages. But you're hitting someone outside, so you should also pay that person some money.

In the company you are directly in the company, and on the outside, it is your personal behavior. So the company should pay you money and pay your salary, and you should also pay the customer some money or apologize.

Legally, the lease contract between the second landlord and you is a valid contract and should be strictly followed. If you move out directly, the second landlord has the right not to refund the deposit, which is the embodiment of the liability for breach of contract. In addition, the second-hand landlord has the right to refuse your request to move out and require you to continue to perform the tenancy contract, which is also a manifestation of your liability for breach of contract.

You cannot claim any compensation from the landlord, firstly there is no contractual basis, and secondly, there is no legal relationship between you and the landlord (the contract is only relative). It is advisable to negotiate with the second landlord to resolve the issue. Considering that the second-hand landlord may not have the consent of the landlord in advance to rent out the house, this can be used as a bargaining chip to negotiate with them.

Incidentally, if you have a job change – for example, you have to move to another place for a new job, you may be able to sue the court to terminate the lease contract and ask for a refund of the deposit if you have to move to another place for a new job, which may be in line with the principle of "change of circumstances" as stated in the Judicial Interpretation 2 of the Contract Law. If there is only a change of work within the same city, the scope for applying the principle of "change of circumstances" is correspondingly smaller, and the answer in the previous paragraph is still valid.

It is possible to move out because the housing contract states that the deposit will not be refunded for less than one year. You will only lose your deposit if you move out.

Let me give you a little advice based on practice:

If you only pay a deposit of 500 yuan, and you don't plan to get the deposit back, and you don't have any other collateral, you can just leave. If you're moving to another city, the landlord gets a $500 deposit after you're gone. He can't go to court and sue you for performance of the contract, and if you don't live in this house, you won't have to pay the next quarter's rent.

First of all, if the mortgage is before the court seals, then the attachment cannot oppose the previous mortgage, and when the seizure, the court is obliged to inform you that the house has been mortgaged.

Second, find the other party's property as soon as possible, and then apply to the court for enforcement to minimize the loss.

Third, if he is a mortgage, then he must use a bank loan to carry out transactions or purchase other items, so he can inquire about the accounts receivable or arrears of the other party and request enforcement from the court.

As for the court's responsibility, I personally believe that it is not appropriate to pursue it, and it is relatively difficult in reality. However, if you breach the contract because you sold the house and cause damages, you should sue for damages, and if not, then you don't have to go against the courts. It is better to use the second and third ways as soon as possible.

Hebei Hongxiang Law Firm.

1. Report to the court leaders when encountering such things;

2. When the court seals the property, it shall go to the housing management department to go through the sealing procedures;

3. The court was grossly negligent in seizing the property, which is not allowed by law.

First of all, it is necessary to find out whether the seizure is before or after the mortgage, if it is after the mortgage, the mortgage is valid, if it is before the mortgage, it is invalid, then the bank has no right to ask for this part of the money.

Second, the real estate certificate does not need to be confiscated when it is sealed.

Third, since the official matter is won, whenever he has money, you can apply to the court for enforcement, not limited to the seized property.

Gather evidence of his other property. Let the court issue him a height restriction order, so that his life will not be easy. It's better for the court to lock him up.

I wonder if you have done property preservation during the litigation, or have you applied for an extension of the preservation period immediately after the expiration of the preservation period? The court will certainly be able to see if the property is mortgaged at the time of seizure, and should also tell you or your lawyer about the seizure. If the property is seized after the mortgage, the mortgagee must be paid first.