Urgent! Urgent! Urgent! If you know the law, please come in!

You don't want to reconcile, so you can't reconcile. If he is subject to criminal proceedings in accordance with the normal procedure, you can file an attached civil complaint for compensation at the same time as the criminal prosecution is filed by the prosecutor's office.

If he does not commit a crime, you can file a civil lawsuit on your own.

Incidental civil lawsuits and civil lawsuits require you to submit proof of your injuries, for example, the hospital certifies that the matter has been accepted by the police station, and the police station has evidence of your injuries, and in the civil lawsuit, you can apply to the court to go to the police station to investigate the evidence.

In what you said, the case should be very clear, because the other party is asking for a settlement, indicating that there is no need to submit any evidence.

If the injury is serious or if he has committed some other criminal act, such as robbery or the like, then he has committed a crime and it is a criminal proceeding.

Go to a lawyer's office for 30 bucks.

The problem is solved.

Yes, you can't be beaten in vain, if it were you, I would rather be detained than beat him.

Let 110 or the traffic police deal with it first, if you settle when the other party is satisfied with the chips you have given you, I think it is better to reconcile, everything is more important than peace, in fact, sue him. If you really want to sue him, you can be charged with intentional injury, and then the litigation costs will be borne by him, your friend's medical expenses, lost work expenses are all borne by him, you don't have to prepare any materials in the early stage, the records and investigations of the public security bureau and the traffic police brigade can be used as materials, you don't have to worry about this, you had better hire a professional lawyer for a lawsuit like this kind of criminal lawsuit, because I am not engaged in legal accidents, but I just know a little bit to give you some advice, and you have to rely on a lawyer to fight a lawsuit. But I think you can win the case, and you didn't do it first.

The police will want you to reconcile.

This kind of thing is a law and order case.

Detention for 7 days or a fine of more than 200 yuan.

Supplementary sentence: How can you give 200, forget it

There are acquaintances who are not allowed to ask him for 2000

It is a civil lawsuit, and it requires a complaint and information on the hospital's medical treatment.

The legal route is slow, it is recommended to let the police detain him, do not pay compensation, if you want compensation, you can't detain, detain him, he will lose his job, it is more appropriate than compensation.

1.In fact, such a request for you is unreasonable and illegal, but for this situation, even if you apply for labor arbitration, you may not have an advantage.

2.You also know that this kind of thing of wearing small shoes for people is very common in the company. And you go to court and say that you have too much work, but the employer will definitely be able to find an example that someone can do it, and the judge will generally not determine whether the amount is excessive, but it is seriously contrary to common sense, and there is no major problem.

3.As for you saying that if you fail to complete the task, half of your salary will be deducted, you can file a separate arbitration for this behavior. Such provisions are generally illegal

You can file a complaint with your local labor department.

The demands are unreasonable. If the workload of the month exceeds the normal workload (evidence is required), and you have not completed the work and your wages are deducted, you can report to the labor inspection department or file a labor arbitration after the deduction. Ask for full payment of wages and overtime pay.

References:

Of course, it doesn't make sense, and you can leave after one month from the date you submit your written resignation.

Otherwise, you can arbitrate with the local labor department, and you have to express your point of view to the company, and the company will automatically abandon you.

Obviously unreasonable. First collect evidence that the boss deliberately assigned you a lot of work to do, and after speaking, you can't deduct half of your salary.

If it were, I would go directly to the boss and say: It is true that the task you assigned cannot be completed at the end of the month, and you must know this better than me. It's not easy for everyone, and no one should be difficult for anyone. There will be a chance to meet in the future, and I can't say what will happen.

If the boss doesn't bird you, then don't talk about it. What to do, how to do it. At the end of the month, you can complete as much as you can.

Pay attention to the evidence, all the evidence that can prove that the boss is difficult for you. Be sure to quietly start collecting evidence before talking to the boss, for fear that the boss will not be able to collect it after the talk. If you are deducted from your salary, tell your boss

Let's go to the Labor Dispute Arbitration Commission. The evidence is useful.

Well.. I don't listen well in class.。。。 This of mine is just a suggestion.,It's just a suggestion.。。 Something happened and was not responsible.

Figure it out for yourself.

If the workload of the month exceeds the normal workload (evidence is required), and you have not completed the work and your wages are deducted, you can report to the labor inspection department or file a labor arbitration after the deduction. Ask for full payment of wages and overtime pay.

It is recommended to have a good talk with him, and take the initiative in such a situation!

If it is indeed towed away by the other party, it will generally not be determined as theft in judicial practice, because its subjective intention is not to take the truck as its own, but only to use it as collateral for the claim. Although it does not constitute the crime of theft, you can still call the police because their actions are still illegal, and the police can ask them to return the car to you. If, after the public security organs intervene, it is found that the other party refuses to admit the facts when he has towed the car and is hiding, his subjective intention will change, and he may be suspected of theft, and the public security organs will open a case for investigation and investigate his criminal responsibility when the criticism and education are ineffective.

Since you have called the police, what you have to do is to cooperate with ** to make a record, provide clues, and find out the tow man. Although the compensation has been negotiated, whether you have paid the compensation in advance or provided a guarantee, if not, the other party's towing is very likely to be used as collateral. Such situations that occur on the basis of civil disputes are generally not simply treated as theft.

You can call the police, if the other party drives away, this behavior is illegal and suspected of theft.

I don't think it's an illegal act, the other party just kept your car as a "guarantee", of course, if you pay full responsibility, he still refuses to return the car to you, that is an illegal act, you can choose to call the police.

It is advisable to sue directly in court.

The sublease of the house shall be approved by the lessor, otherwise it shall be invalid.

1. Determination of the nature of your lease contract. At first, you say that you have sublet the right to use the shop from the first operator, but then you say that you have signed a lease with the landlord. It feels a bit messy.

Whether it is a sublease contract or a general lease contract needs to be further determined. If the actual parties to the lease contract are you and the landlord, the contract should be a general lease contract. If the other party is the first operator, it should be a sublease contract.

2. Determination of the validity of the sublease contract. According to Article 28 of the Measures for the Administration of Urban Housing Leasing, the sublease contract must be agreed in writing by the original lessor! If the contract is a sublease contract, then only the landlord's consent is not in writing, then the validity of the contract needs to be further determined!

Due to the violation of the mandatory provisions of the "Measures for the Administration of Urban Housing Leasing", in accordance with Article 52 of the Contract Law, the contract that violates the national law and the mandatory provisions of the administrative regulations is invalid. The Measures for the Administration of Urban Housing Leasing were issued by the Ministry of Construction and are administrative regulations. As a result, the sublease may be deemed invalid!

3. On the issue of transfer fee. In a sublease contract, the law does not prohibit the first lessee from receiving a certain reasonable fee from the sublease contract.

4. Whether to renew the lease upon expiration. Generally speaking, after the expiration of the lease term, the original lessee has the right of first refusal under the same conditions. However, there is no problem for the lessor to adjust the rent according to the market after the expiration of the lease.

5. Regarding the nature of the rent of 50,000 yuan you said. Is the $50,000 an agreed one-year rent or 3 or 5 years or something else? This is related to the determination of the lease term of your contract.

1. As analyzed above, the sublease contract can be requested to be invalid. If it is found to be invalid, it can claim a refund of the so-called "transfer fee" from the first operator;

2. During the operation of the store, if the decoration is made with the consent of the lessor, if it cannot be dismantled or separated, the other party can be requested to give a certain compensation!

i] This post was last published on 2008-4-1805:52pm[i]].

Very serious, scholarly demeanor.

1.The medical expenses shall be borne by the other party, and you can provide a hospital report and a certificate of charges.

2.Compensation for moral damages is impossible, because the relevant laws in China are very imperfect, and at present, the court may only support moral damages if death (death consolation), disability (solatium) and disfigurement cause obvious and significant damage that cannot be compensated by other means. Of course, you can also ask the other person, but don't take it too seriously, the other person agrees to give a little is a little bit.

sued the court and demanded tens of thousands, at most a few hundred.

3.If your mother really has the root cause of the disease, she can claim compensation according to the hospital diagnosis report, but if she can't prove it, she can't claim it.

4.If it is not serious and does not cause more than minor injuries, the other party does not bear criminal responsibility, but may still bear the punishment under the Public Security Administration Punishment Law, and can be required to compensate more with the support of **.

It depends on the diagnosis certificate issued by the hospital when your mother is in the hospital, and if the injury is minor, you can sue the court for compensation for medical expenses and mental damages.

If your horse eats someone else's seedlings, you should be compensated, and you should bear the losses caused by the animal to others.

However, this situation of your family, that is, compensating each other, and in the end, no one gives money to anyone, offset.

1. The medical expenses and necessary examination fees shall be paid by family A.

2. As for compensation for mental damages, it is more difficult, and you can ask the other party to apologize.

1. You can request A to compensate for medical expenses, nursing expenses, nutrition expenses and subsequent expenses. If you become disabled, you can claim disability compensation. If you do not have a disability, you may claim an appropriate amount of solatium for moral damages.

2. A can be appropriately compensated for the loss caused to A by the destruction of A's crops by the horses at home.

I am not a lawyer and the following is just a personal opinion:

1.Is compensation for moral damages reasonable? Irrationality.

2.Settlement of medical expenses: A is responsible.

3.About Ma Eat Miao: Your family should be liable for compensation.

1. According to Article 22 of the Tort Liability Law implemented on July 1, 2010, if the personal rights and interests of others are infringed and serious mental damage is caused, the infringed party may claim compensation for moral damages. It can be seen that only when serious mental damage is caused can one claim for moral damages, and the circumstances mentioned above do not constitute serious circumstances, so there is no need to pay for moral damages.

Serious circumstances generally refer to the death, disability or injury of the victim as a result of the tortious act, and the victim suffers medically provable physical or mental injury.

2. In order to reduce future troubles, ask your classmates to write a written agreement stating that you will not be held accountable for this matter.

Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues Concerning the Determination of Liability for Moral Damages in Civil Torts.

Article 8: Where mental harm is caused as a result of infringement, but no serious consequences are caused, and the victim's request for compensation for mental harm is generally not supported, and the people's court may, on the basis of the circumstances, order the infringer to stop the infringement, restore their reputation, eliminate the impact, and make a formal apology.

Is there serious consequences for your situation? Fear of mobile schools may become a reason for his constant blackmail. It's also best to sign an agreement if it's private, don't give money without credentials, and generally reach an agreement on minor incidents, as long as it's not obviously unfair, it's over.

If the compensation for mental damage is not supported, even if it is a normal thing to get into trouble with the school, it will not be punished much.

1. It is not clear whether the headache was caused by your slap, and even if it is caused, it is uncertain whether it constitutes a minor injury as stipulated in the law, so you have not caused infringement to the classmate, and your conflict is just a small conflict between ordinary classmates, so there is no need to panic. 2. Since there is no infringement and no infringement occurs, you should not be liable for compensation, and the previous 500 yuan is also a little responsibility and compensation that you are willing to bear based on your own fault, but you cannot be required to bear the liability for compensation because of this, let alone moral damages in the legal sense, which is determined by the court. 3. After the 300 yuan, you don't want to continue, at present, it seems that you are too worried, do not do too much, the other party has to inch in, you better let the school teacher deal with it, a slap is not as serious as you think, the school will not deal with how serious, at most verbal reprimand, otherwise you may be entangled by the other party for a long time.

4. Legal basis: Article 22 of the Tort Liability Law, which came into effect on July 1, 2010, provides that if the personal rights and interests of others are infringed upon and serious mental damage is caused, the infringed party may claim compensation for moral damages.

Not in the same situation as you and your classmates.