Is it a foul to take someone in the back Is it a foul to take someone in the back of a basketball?

There is no provision in the rules that the back cover (usually called back risk) is considered a foul The reason why the back risk is blown is more because the back cover is usually separated from the body of the attacking player, and it is easy to have physical contact, so it is easy to be blown for a foul In addition, the back risk is usually more dangerous, because the offensive player cannot see the back, has no preparation, is prone to injury, and is also for the purpose of protecting the player

The back of the successful cover must be very clean, regardless of whether the opponent has a shot or not, as long as it does not touch the opponent's body, it is definitely not a foul

But most of this is in the hands of the referee on the spot.

Not at all, it's just wishful thinking to count a foul behind your back, but there is a situation to distinguish, that is, the opponent doesn't make a shot, and you press your hand on the ball, that is, your hand enters the cylinder of his area, so it is considered a foul, because this is a dangerous action, and everything else should not be considered a foul.

No, but in order to protect the player, it is a foul to touch the opponent's body, because it can seriously injure the player. But amateur players often think that this is a foul, which is not right, but they do it to protect everyone, because when the leg and waist and abdomen strength are not reached, it is impossible to control the body posture in the air, so it is not recommended. In addition, when you play amateurly, there are many times when you play on the concrete floor, so if you cover the cap in the air and fall to the ground, the consequences of the injury may be very serious.

As long as there is no physical contact, it can't be considered a foul, looking back at the previous games, a game of the Bulls that year, in the end, wasn't it also Grant who covered someone else's back, and the Bulls narrowly won? Closer, last season's Nuggets, didn't Camby's back block also click, and the referee didn't blow a foul, did the Nuggets win narrowly in the end? However, most of the game is in the hands of the referee, and the penalty scale of each referee is different, so there are different opinions.

It's not a foul, as long as you don't touch someone else.

The deepest memory is that in the NBA Finals, Kobe Bryant blew Xiao Ai behind his back at that time, Kobe Bryant went to argue, and then there were rules, saying that it was not a foul. It's hard to grasp, though.

It's not a pull, it's a hat. But be careful, don't hit it!

Count! Back blocks have always been considered fouls!

As long as the action is clean, it is not a foul.

Covering the back is not a foul.

It's too easy to have physical contact with the back, so it's basically a foul.

It used to be counted, but now it doesn't.

Just don't hit it...

But it's usually a hit-

Back in 2002 the back cover was outlawed.

Do you think you won't feel pain if you give you a punch?

Blocking is a reasonable defensive action, regardless of before and after, whether a foul is committed depends on whether the defender has unreasonable physical contact with the offensive player while defending. If there is no unreasonable physical contact, it is a good ball, otherwise it is a foul.

However, standing behind an offensive player can easily lead to a foul. Therefore, the referee pays special attention to the defenders standing behind the attacking players, so everyone sometimes mistakenly thinks that "a back block is a foul".