How to organise an event related to the Moot Court ? Urgent!!!

First, you have to identify a case.

Secondly, in order to add a little fun, you can find an actor to interpret the case, which can add a little funny factor, so that the audience can participate in it and integrate into it more than reading out the background of the case dryly.

Third, and most importantly, what is the nature of your case, what kind of litigation procedures are applicable, and what issues should be paid attention to in the course of litigation. This is the homework you should do in advance, you can refer to some video recordings of the trial and the provisions of our procedural law.

Finally, the presiding judge and adjudicators should be determined, the original defendant and the original defendant should be determined in civil cases, administrative cases and criminal private prosecution cases, and the prosecution, criminal suspects and defense lawyers, as well as witnesses and evidentiary materials should be determined in public prosecution cases.

In order to make the moot court more realistic, some parts should not be pre-set, but free to play by both the original defendant and the defendant, for example, in the courtroom debate stage, do not let the actors read according to the set script, do not let the actors feel that they are acting, but let them really participate in the trial and interpret the case as a real event.

A moot court can be divided into four groups: a trial team, an indictment team, a defence team and a general team.

1. The trial team is composed of the presiding judge, adjudicators (jurors), clerks, and other persons who do not appear in court.

2. The prosecution team is composed of the public prosecutor or the plaintiff and their ** persons, as well as those who do not appear in court.

3. The defense team is composed of defense lawyers, people and people who do not appear in court.

4. The comprehensive group is composed of criminal suspects, defendants, victims, witnesses, evaluators, bailiffs, and other litigation participants, as well as persons who do not appear in court.

The proposed court procedure is as follows:1. Case introduction (interpretation of the case in the form of performance).

2. The first stage of the court trial (conducting a court investigation, the public prosecution reading the indictment, and the presentation of evidence by both parties, etc.).

3. On-site legal knowledge is rewarded and answered (enlivening the on-site atmosphere) 4. The second stage of the court trial is rounded (the prosecution and defense cross-examine evidence and publish the indictment and defense opinions, and the collegial panel will close the court).

5. Interesting small case performance (let the audience ask questions and answers on the legal knowledge of small cases to enhance the interest of the activity).

6. The third stage of the court hearing (reading the verdict.

7. The audience discusses the verdict (assuming that the audience is a jury and judges the facts of the case) 8. The second-instance trial procedure (remanded by the Provincial High Court for retrial).

9. Comments from legal experts.

10. Leader's speech.

1. The clerk checks the situation of the parties;

2. The clerk announces that he stands and the judge enters;

3. The judge introduces the basic situation of the case (round chamber).

A: Composition, original defendant, cause of action, etc.);

4. The plaintiff reads out the indictment and starts with the litigation claim;

5. The defendant reads out the defense;

6. The judge may ask questions and summarize the focus of the debate.

7. Court investigation and evidence exchange: The plaintiff presents the first set of evidence, explains the content of the evidence, and transmits it to the defendant for cross-examination, and the defendant expresses his cross-examination opinions (generally from the two aspects of the authenticity of the evidence and the content of the evidence, such as no objection to the authenticity, but there are objections to the content of the proof, etc.). A second set of evidence is then presented, and then the defendant presents evidence;

8. In court debate, the plaintiff speaks first and the defendant speaks later, mainly to explain the disputed facts;

9. The judge asks whether it is mediation, and if not, it will be decided immediately.