Mona Lisa, a broken painting, is it that mysterious?

I have to say that you are asking this question superficially. I don't know if you've read art history.

Marx said that if you want to enjoy art, you must be educated in art.

The Mona Lisa is a work of art that has a high aesthetic value. He reflects not only the mysterious smile of a woman and the complex mood behind this mysterious smile, but also the perfect combination of skill and emotion of the painter in the painting.

You know? Art is not technology, the most essential difference between it and digital photography technology is that it has a strong subjective color, you shoot people and scenes, yes, it is the most accurate reproduction, but maybe there are spots on the faces of people you photograph, and the scenery you photograph is broken and garbage, but artworks are different, they will become very beautiful and connotative through the subjective emotions of artists, location management, color tone and so on. Have you ever seen a perfect work that reproduces reality in its entirety?

If you want to be wise, you have to ask a wiser question, obviously, I'm here your question is very stupid, I'm sorry, no blame, just ask you to respect the contribution of art in the history of mankind, to put it mildly, it gives us the enjoyment of beauty in life, and it is the highest spiritual food.

Hehe, I've seen this before.

These two different arts, there will be no one to replace the other. True-to-life, indeed speed. But this cannot be a reason to replace painting.

Similar to replacing a brush with a fountain pen bar. Although the brush is no longer used on a daily basis, it will continue to exist as an art.

No matter how much machinery is king, it may not be able to replace manual work, isn't there such an example?

If one day these arts are lost, everything must be in line with efficiency. I thought it was the sadness of art.

Speaking of the "Meng" painting, I don't agree with those comments that are so profound and subtle. Most people are still the same, how many people can understand? As for the so-called mystery, this one has been revealed.

I don't know if it's true or not. I can't see much magic in the reproduction.

Realistic painting and photograph are two completely different concepts.

It's like calligraphy is the same as today's mechanical typesetting.

Let's talk about that painting, in terms of technique and the objective context of the time, the Mona Lisa is an outstanding work in the field of painting, the almost perfect sense of line, the sense of proportion of the figures, the outline of the expressions of the characters, the sketch of the painting, and the background story of the author's painting, and so on.

To put it bluntly, for example, everybody has a digital camera, but if you take the same landscape, because of the different angles, focus, exposure, and so on, and so on, and the finished product is quite different, that painting is a great work in that field, and you can't compare it with things from other fields, and it's okay to make the same analogy.

It is said that the transmission of an art and culture is like Peking Opera, which is not listened to by many people, but it is called the quintessence of the country, why is singing not the quintessence of the country?

What is the value of an antique, which cannot be used, and is not as fine and beautiful as the current crafts, but it represents an art that people have created in it.

Sociologists, archaeologists, gourmets, critics, all of them don't seem to have much to do for humanity (at least for most people).

Remember the phrase "Existence is reasonable".

No, painting is not a type of art. It's a treat to draw. Appreciation is also a pleasure. Unless you don't have the ability to appreciate beauty.

The main reason is that the Renaissance advocated the idea of emancipating human nature, breaking the model of religion as the supreme dominance in the Middle Ages, which is reflected in the paintings, that is, the paintings in the Middle Ages are all religious themes, and there is no feeling of living people. After the Renaissance, everyone began to pay attention to people, society, and the power of people. Leonardo da Vinci is one of the "Three Masters of Art", and the Mona Lisa is a real-life person, and her smile shows a kind of ordinary beauty that makes people feel real.

I think this painting plays a kind of turning point, it is representative.

The painting contains a lot of painting techniques, layout principles, and is worth scrutinizing.

It's not that he paints well, partly because of the painter's fame, and partly because of the mysterious smile in the painting.

One million years ago, the Buddha came to the world, and when he left, he glanced at all beings out of the corner of his eye. That eye was recorded forever, and later generations spent 800,000 years deciphering the mystery of that eye and coming to 990,000 conclusions. 800,000 years later, the Buddha reappeared, and later generations of scholars asked the Buddha what avenue was contained in that eye, and the Buddha replied that his eyes were dry.