Why was the Battle of Tohei lost? Others who fought in Tohei ri

Updated on Game 2024-04-27
8 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    The main reason for the defeat of the Combine Army in the Battle of Tohei-ri was that there was a problem with its own coordination, not because the firepower of the Volunteer Army was too fierce and could not calmly respond to the battle. In fact, there was not much difference between the strength of the enemy and our army in this battle, but after two days and two nights of fighting, the number of our army was more than twice as large as the enemy. Through this battle, our army understood how to better coordinate operations under the conditions of modernization to repel a strong enemy.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    First of all, it was because of insufficient preparation, hasty response to the battle, and recklessness in the absence of an unknown enemy situation, which caused great losses. And lack of ability to attack. That's why this war will be lost.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    The first reason is that our army immediately joined the combat operation without finding out the situation. The second reason is that our army and the DPRK army jointly resist the enemy, but there is no unified command after the run-in period, resulting in too scattered forces and firepower.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    First, they attacked suddenly without finding out the internal situation of the enemy; Second, there was no run-in with the DPRK army, and the combat cooperation was not tacit.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    Handsome is handsome, and the general is the general, Han Xianchu and Li Qiwei all understand.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    How the United States lost the Battle of Shangganling.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    This was a distressing battle, which was originally a siege and annihilation battle similar to Meng Lianggu's siege and annihilation of the 74th Division, but the opponent was different, and it became a tough battle, but it lacked the necessary conditions and equipment for attacking the fortified positions in the field, and the weapons were inferior to people, so the defeat was reasonable.

    In the Korean War, there are many such examples, five battles during the 40th Army, 120th Division, 359th Regiment 2nd Battalion surrounded the 92nd Armored Field Artillery Battalion of the U.S. Army, two infantry companies fought for three days and three nights did not knock down this artillery position, and this artillery position in the defense at the same time can continue to complete the artillery support tasks in all directions, the final ** ratio is less than 100 people left in our two companies, and the US army Heng only ** 15 people.

    In the face of history, we can only sum up the lessons for the benefit of the future.

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    This campaign had a great impact on the strategy and tactics of the US army, and the US troops gained new combat experience. Once the reorganized US troops were surrounded by the Chinese volunteers, they no longer rushed to break through as they had in previous battles, but relied on tanks and trucks to implement circular defense, relying on fierce firepower to desperately hold their positions. As long as the volunteers could not solve the battle that night, a large group of American planes would come to bomb and cover the breakthrough as soon as dawn came.

    The besieged troops often broke through successfully under the direct cover and support of tanks and artillery.

    After the war, the 23rd Regiment and the French Battalion received the Order of Merit for Meritorious Service from the United States.

Related questions
5 answers2024-04-27

Because although the main force of the Zhao army was destroyed, there were still many small armies that resisted to the death, so the Zhao State was destroyed after 40 years.

7 answers2024-04-27

No, Lian Po's unstable tactics are successful, but due to the influence of Zhao's national strength, it will lead to the passivity of the Battle of Changping, but if it is fought head-on with the Qin army, it will be even more disastrous.

11 answers2024-04-27

In, I just went to see it a week ago, got off at Gaoping Station, there is a ruins about 10 miles to the northwest, in fact, the ancient battlefield covers an area of dozens of miles, the Red River you said is probably the Dan River, and there are still there.

14 answers2024-04-27

The Changping battle between Qin and Zhao was more likely to win in any way, and Lian Po adopted a defensive policy, which was indeed a good method when Qin was strong and Zhao was weak, but it was not a long-term solution; Since the Shang Dynasty changed the law, the Qin State rewarded cultivation and warfare, and both the quality of soldiers and grain and grass reserves far surpassed that of Zhao. In this war, both sides invested a lot of troops, and after the end of the war, the number of soldiers killed by Zhao alone reached 400,000, and the daily consumption of these 400,000 people was not a small amount. Lian Po has adhered to the defensive policy for more than a year, and Zhao can be said to have tightened his belt to live, Zhao is not as good as Qin, and its geographical location itself is not rich in food, and it is very likely that Zhao will be consumed to death first in a defensive war. >>>More

6 answers2024-04-27

During the Warring States Period, Qin and Zhao were both great powers, Qin became very powerful through the Shang Dynasty reform, and Zhao became very strong through Zhao Wuling King Hu Fu Cavalry and Archery, and both countries could eventually dominate the world. Both Zhao and Qin invested a lot of troops in the Battle of Changping, and supported the war with the strength of the whole country, and the king of Zhao fell into a divisive plan and replaced Lian Po with Zhao Kuo, as a result, the Zhao army was defeated, and it was only a matter of time before Qin unified the world. So if Li Mu replaced Lian Po as the commander in the Battle of Changping, would Zhao Guo win? >>>More