The employee of the hotel was fired for racial discrimination, is the hotel s action right or wrong?

If the hotel staff was really racially discriminatory against the black woman, then the hotel was right.

The incident occurred at a North Carolina hotel when a black customer came to the hotel pool with his children to play, and the employee brought two police officers to the black woman and asked him to show proof that they were guests of the hotel. And the employee said to the woman, "Because there are always people like you who use the pool without permission." So the black woman felt discriminated against, and it was racist.

It has to be said that from the description of the black woman Wright alone, the employee does have racist tendencies. Because the father and daughter said that they had indeed booked a room in advance at this hotel, and he also had the key to open the room, it meant that he was a guest of this hotel, but the employee still asked me to open the door in front of them again, which was very suspicious. Employees also describe themselves as such people, so I would like to ask who such a person is, whether he is a so-called black person, so this employee is considered to be racist.

Although the black man refused to provide identification to **, the two police officers who accompanied him eventually checked his license plate to determine that the black man was indeed a hotel guest.

After verifying the incident, the hotel immediately fired the employeeThe person in charge of the hotel also said that "according to **, we can see that there have been incidents of discrimination against guests in our own hotel, and we have zero tolerance for racism and any form of discrimination, and the employee has now been fired." ”

In fact, this matter is placed at this special moment, and it can only be said that the hotel has solved it very well, but it may be that the hotel is a little noisy. Because since the death of Floyd, a black American due to police violence in the United States, there is now a large-scale, anti-racism and anti-violent law enforcement anti-epidemic in the United States, if this matter is not 9 stores to personally cut through the mess to solve the staff, but by the black woman herself announced on the **, then this is undoubtedly another disaster that adds fuel to the fire, so I have to say that the hotel may be a bit radical in dealing with it, because only from a few sentences of a **, it is not certain that the employee is racist, However, he chose to fire the employee to stop the turmoil.

The hotel is doing the right thing, especially now that the racist should be fired.

That's right. Although racial discrimination is a matter of perception, all men are created equal.

It should be said that it is correct, because it ostensibly upholds the rules of the hotel, which is racial equality, and it can attract many people to stay, so to speak, a small loss in exchange for success.

Yes, racism is not right in the first place, as a hotel employee should respect customers, why should the boss spend money to hire someone who does not have a good service attitude.