The cost per kilometer is less than 1 yuan, why is no one willing to buy new energy vehicles?

Although the cost per kilometer of new energy vehicles is relatively low, many people still have great doubts about the durability of their batteries, and the most expensive place of the whole new energy vehicle can be said to be the battery, once the battery has a problem, then it will cost a lot of money to repair, as consumers are definitely not willing to pay this money, and the endurance of these electric vehicles is also a problem, many places in the country have not yet set up charging piles, which limits the areas that these electric vehicles can reach.

There is also the fact that although these new energy vehicles have the best subsidies, it seems that the first is cheaper on the surface, but in fact, the amount of consumer payment is not less than that of fuel vehicles with the same performance, so many people still prefer to choose fuel vehicles.

There is also the safety of new energy vehicles to be verified, after all, the car has just been launched not long ago, and it has yet to be verified by the market. Because you drive a new energy vehicle is equivalent to running around the street with a lot of battery packs, I don't know if it will leak, whether it will be because the temperature is too high, this is the reason why many people are afraid of new energy vehicles.

The fuel consumption of new energy vehicles is relatively low, but the first of new cars is relatively high, and the maintenance cost in the later stage is relatively high, coupled with the difficulty of charging, short mileage and other drawbacks.

As a high-tech means of transportation with better energy-saving and environmental protection performance, new energy vehicles have appeared in the public eye, and everyone has mixed reviews. More people generally have a wait-and-see attitude. Any new thing, in the initial period of time, will bring you a lot of confusion and confusion.

There are also a lot of unknowns for ordinary people. The main reason is that the proportion of doubts is too large. Most of the issues of general concern are concentrated in these aspects:

Are the supporting measures for the charging of new energy vehicles complete? Is it cumbersome to repair after a breakdown during normal use driving, and is the cost too high? <>

If repairing a car is more expensive than buying a car, then no one wants to spend that money. Imported new energy vehicles are generally too high, the general public thinks that it is not cost-effective, can not bear such a gap, and the quality of domestic new energy vehicles still needs time to test.

Because of its high cost and practicability, new energy vehicles have the inconvenience of long charging time, which is also a threshold that restricts their development and popularization. However, now the country is seizing the time to develop and overcome this technical problem, and lithium batteries have also achieved initial results in replacing traditional batteries.

It is necessary to ensure that the charging time of the battery is short, and to ensure the high life of the battery. I believe that it will not be long before this goal will be achieved. You won't have to worry about anything else.

It is undeniable that the development of new energy vehicles is faster than we imagined. Cool appearance, luxurious configuration, zero fuel consumption, high performance, are catching the attention of most people, and many people are eager to try. But for some people, even though new energy has surpassed fuel vehicles in terms of convenience, there are still a few stubborn diseases that have become a wait-and-see concern.

Many friends around me are against pure electric vehicles, and some even talk about electric color change, thinking that as long as there are fuel vehicles, they will not buy pure electric vehicles. They have no advantages, short battery life, low safety, and battery crash period is their biggest concern. The cost of using a bicycle is not ideal.

In their consciousness, they simply raised an "electric dad". In my opinion, at this stage, this kind of resistance to them is not groundless, because I feel it deeply. Two years ago, pure electric vehicles were relatively rare in our local area.

At that time, considering the low cost of using a car, my family and I decided to choose the Model 3 after careful consideration. After a while, it can be found that a low-priced car is a burden on the mind.

In order to promote the development of pure electric vehicles, many car companies take the low-cost amplification of vehicles as a selling point, so as to be independent of consumers' impressions. Even many pure electric vehicle owners generally report that the charging capacity of pure electric vehicles is low for 100 kilometers, which can save a lot of money compared with fuel vehicles. In fact, this statement is rather confusing.

Just like some air conditioners say that the blood is boiling, you only need to use electricity once a night. However, when you actually get your hands on it, you'll notice that there's still a big difference. Careful people may find that the actual interpretation is limited by various circumstances and can only be used as a reference and has little practical significance.

Only by comparing with the same level of fuel vehicles can we draw real conclusions.

BEVs rely heavily on charging stations. If you want to save money, you can't do it without independent parking spaces and fixed charging piles. Therefore, pure electric vehicles are very inconvenient to use in daily life and will bring more expenses.

Unlike fuel vehicles, there is no need for a fixed parking space, as long as it can be accommodated, you can park boldly. At the same time, it also brings new problems. Taking the current situation of most of us as an example, it is worth pondering whether to buy a parking space or a parking space.

In most places, car space is more cost-effective than car space. For example, our local parking space, 200 yuan a month 2400, rented for 20 years is less than 50,000, and the parking space costs 60,000.

In fact, many people oppose new energy, not because of the short battery life. At present, the range of 500 kilometers of electric vehicles is not a problem at all. At the end of the day, it's not perfect to resist it.

It is difficult to charge for a long time, the value rate of the burning blue ridge is not high, the battery replacement is expensive, and the skin seepage warranty is not clear. If these major problems are solved, it is believed that pure electric vehicles will soon replace fuel vehicles. If you are interested in pure electricity, you may wish to consider whether you can accept these pain points.

This kind of car is more troublesome when charging, and the battery power will drop very quickly in the later stage, and you may not be able to find a place to charge.

The main reason is that the charging speed of this kind of car is too slow, and the charging pile is not widely popular.

The main reason is that the problem of the range of the train cannot be solved, so many people cannot accept the train.

Whether new energy saves money or not depends on your use environment and from which dimension you look at the problem. I have a fixed parking space and a sail or accompanying charging pile, and I have a petrol truck at home. If you discuss the cost incurred in the process of use, the cost of using the car is saved, the average fuel car is five or six cents a kilometer, and the tram is less than 1 cent; (The biggest advantage) is a quick start; It's not that you can't charge, but to find a charging station, it takes a lot of time to charge, and even the charging station may queue up.

More and more people are buying new energy vehicles, no need to burn oil, and electricity is cheap. On the surface, this is indeed the case, but it is all wrong, and the key cost is in the future: the battery of new energy vehicles has a service life, and the current service life of the car battery is 6 years.

In addition to the use of new energy vehicles can save money, maintenance is also very cost-effective, because new energy vehicles do not have complex transmission devices and oil circuits, maintenance is basically based on inspection, the group slips to be very cheap in terms of maintenance costs, public charging piles are actually commercial electricity, its charging standards are much higher than our household electricity charging standards, buy electric vehicles and choose to go to public charging places to charge, it is inevitable that there will be additional service fees, even parking fees, etc., New energy vehicles can also be short-distance, it is useless to go on the high-speed, say that there is no electricity, there is no electricity, the new energy vehicle battery is very expensive, more expensive than the cost of fuel, gasoline car refueling, not stupid to drive without refueling, new energy vehicles can not drive the same, more than three years to change the battery.

First of all, you can enjoy national and local subsidies, and you will save a lot of money on buying a car. If you're in Shanghai, you'll still have a little money left over for the photoshoot. Although fuel vehicles will be a little more troublesome and expensive than pure electric vehicles in terms of maintenance, new energy electric vehicles also need regular maintenance, and if the battery of pure electric vehicles is broken, the cost of replacing the battery will be particularly high.

It can be done. Because new energy vehicles are now completely electrically driven, this cost can be done.

Personally, I think that new energy vehicles should not be able to do it, after all, I think it is difficult to do such a low cost, after all, the electricity bill is relatively expensive now.

Of course, it can be done, because the electricity cost for charging a pure electric car is very cheap.

It is undeniable that the development of new energy vehicles is faster than we imagined. Cool appearance, luxurious configuration, zero fuel consumption, high performance, is catching the attention of most people, and many people are eager to try. But for some people, even though new energy has surpassed fuel vehicles in terms of convenience, there are still a few stubborn diseases that have become a wait-and-see concern.

For electric cars, the original ones will not be bought. This kind of car is too single, and it is necessary to hang the life mileage. Is this buying a car or is there a tendency to self-injure?

Some things are marked, naturally excluded from themselves, and even find ways to have a high cost.

Last week, a colleague shoved the key into my hand and said that it had turned my three views upside down. A week later, my attitude was, well, buy. If you buy it, be sure to do it early.

Whether new energy saves money depends on the environment in which you use it, and from which dimension you look at it. I have a fixed parking space and charging pile, and I have a tanker truck at home. If you discuss the expenses incurred in the process of use, the cost of using the car will be saved.

Tankers cost an average of five or six kilometers, and trams less than a kilometer. (The biggest advantage) is a quick start; It's not that you can't charge, it's that you can find a charging station.

It takes a lot of time to charge, and even charging stations may queue up. More and more people are buying new energy vehicles. They don't need to burn oil carefully, and electricity is cheap.

This is ostensibly true, but both are wrong. The key cost lies in the future: the battery of new energy vehicles has a service life.

The current service life of car batteries is 6 years. Many of my friends are against pure electric vehicles, and some even talk about electric color change, thinking that as long as there is a shortage of fuel, they will not buy pure electric vehicles. They have no advantages, short battery life, low safety, and battery crash periods are their maximum wide fluid concerns.

The cost of using the bike is not ideal. In their consciousness, they simply raised an "electric dad". In my opinion, at this stage, this kind of resistance to them is not groundless, because I feel it deeply.

Two years ago, pure electric vehicles were relatively rare in our local area. At that time, considering the low cost of using a car, my family and I decided to choose the Model 3 after careful consideration. After a while, it can be found that a low-priced car is a burden on the mind.

In some cities here, buying a car is a matter of choice. First, what category to choose. You can leave your fantasies on the tanker, which is the premise of an iron plate, a half-fly or even a fly.

The people's yuan is not blowing to the sky, but more afraid. Because this policy has a high wall on the way to buy a fuel car, it is simply a detour.

First of all, due to the battery, the battery is more expensive, and the continuation of the forest is not very stable, and there is the problem of the safety of the electric mountain bike has not been effectively improved, and everyone is still more accustomed to the previous gasoline car.

This is because the battery life is not particularly long, and it is more difficult to charge it once there is no power.

Because the electric car is difficult to charge, the situation of slow charging is still very serious, and the bottleneck has not yet been broken through in technology, and it is afraid of cold in winter, and it is afraid of turning on the air conditioner at high speed, and its actual car Zen core cost is not lower than that of fuel He stupid digging car.

There is a big difference between new energy vehicles and traditional energy vehicles in terms of energy consumption costs.

If the power consumption per kilometer of new energy vehicles is calculated, 1 kilometer is less than 1 cent, which has a huge advantage over traditional energy vehicles.

However, even so, there are still many people who feel that new energy vehicles are inferior to traditional energy vehicles.

This is the case for several reasons:

1. The closure force of the continuation is low.

There is a certain gap between the endurance of new energy vehicles and traditional energy vehicles.

Such a situation is a more important issue for people who drive. ......If you go the long way, the problem of low endurance of new energy vehicles will be very obvious, which will have a greater impact on car owners.

2. Charging is difficult.

If low endurance is still a relatively solvable problem, then the difficulty of charging is a very big problem for new energy vehicles.

At present, the specific performance of the problem of charging difficulties is as follows:

1. The number of charging piles is small, and it takes a long time to wait when charging.

2. The charging time is relatively long, and the delay time is more.

3. It is greatly affected by the ambient temperature.

New energy vehicles use batteries as energy**. The battery is more ...... affected by the environmentWhen the battery is at a relatively low ambient temperature, the battery power will decrease, resulting in a further decrease in the endurance of new energy vehicles, which will have a greater impact on new energy vehicle users.

4. Battery attenuation problem.

New energy vehicles use batteries as energy**, and the battery's power will decay with longer use. ......This will increase the cost of use, and at the same time, it will also have an impact on the use of new energy vehicles.

The above is the reason why the energy use cost of new energy vehicles is lower, but some people feel that they are not as good as traditional energy vehicles.