The new TOEFL writing seeks to score 2 in order to achieve a score of 4

I have taken the TOEFL test four times since 08, the first three TOEFL writing scores hovered around 22 points, and the fourth time I finally got 28 points in one fell swoop.

1.Keep writing every day. The last time I reviewed, I insisted on an independent writing every day, and after the first circle was used in a notepad card, I revised it in word. Daily assignments can give you a sense of grasping the topic of the essay, which is the royal way to winning in the exam room.

2.Conduct Chinese-English translation exercises. Don't underestimate this link, it has a vital role.

My recommended material is the book "GRE Writing Official Question Bank", which was compiled by Xiu Rui and Zhang Leidong. The articles in the book are very original, and the words and sentences can feel comfortable and natural. There is a lot of analysis in many of the topics, which is very helpful to grasp the structure when writing the article.

3.If you only complete the above two steps, I don't think you will make great progress, don't forget, but also sort out what you have learned every day, typical sentence patterns, vocabulary, examples, the angle of analyzing the problem, including your own thinking process within one minute of getting the question, how to maximize its efficiency, you should pay attention to.

In addition, when you feel tired from reviewing, you can read the original English book**, pay attention, don't look too thick, at least it must be thinner than the rubby, otherwise it will be very unaccomplished if you can't finish it.

5.The last point is that diligence can make up for clumsiness, and there are not many students who rely on templates to get high scores, so they still have to speak with strength. A point of sweat, there will be a point of gain, friends, please work hard, hope is in front of you, TOEFL is a game

I would also like to say two words about the TOEFL test and comprehensive writing.

1.The key is whether you understand the speaker's point of view, each point of view is supplemented by 1-2 points, and here you have to listen carefully to its examples.

2.Don't write long, my comprehensive writing has a total of 245 words, as long as the answer is correct, of course, if you can better explain the relationship between the content in listening and the content in reading, and explain the professor's argue (agree) process well, the high score will naturally come naturally.

3.The material of comprehensive writing can be used with TPO questions, in which the content of listening may have a little accent, you can listen to the audio separately, and be familiar with the habit of narration, which is very beneficial to the question.

1.Comprehensive writing is all very standard four-paragraph format. The first paragraph is the general opening paragraph, which explains the argument, and the second, third, and fourth paragraphs each state an argument to support the argument. It is normal to encounter non-standard questions in practice, but you will not encounter them in the exam, and they are very clear and clear.

2.According to the OG requirements, the relationship between listening content and reading should be clearly clarified, so that at each point, it is not necessary to repeat the content of the reading material, but to summarize it, and the main focus is on listening, how listening opposes reading material. This is also a test point for listening to be examined.

3.The rules are clear, the wording is precise, and the relationship between listening and reading can be written very clearly.

5.In the past three years, more than 99% of them have the opposite view. The last two years have all been on the opposite footing.

TOEFL Integrated Writing requires test takers to be able to combine lecture and lecture content with reading materials and other materials to write. In the Integrated Writing question type, candidates must: take notes on the material they hear and see, and use the notes to organize the information before writing; Accurately summarize, paraphrase, and cite information from the source material; Write about how the information you hear relate to what you read.

1.There will be transitions. Remember that you have to transition.

Understand why you're transitioning. If this transition does not prove the relationship between the argument and the thesis, but the relationship between the arguments, it is necessary to make sure that the new thesis also proves the thesis. Your transition is not about your own article, but about helping readers to transition their thinking and lead them into new thinking, so you must make sure the direction of the transition and whether you are leaving your topic with your readers.

2.will be segmented. Be clear about your line of thought and know that you have several arguments.

The first paragraph makes the argument clear, don't talk nonsense. Argument paragraph by paragraph, argument should not be crossed. There should be argument sentences in one paragraph, and all other sentences should be argumentative about this point, and don't talk nonsense.

The general conclusion of the end paragraph is common, reflecting the point of view in the first paragraph, don't talk nonsense ......

In fact, there is nothing to practice in practice, since your composition is also 22 years old, then reading and listening should not be low, personal experience, three columns of draft paper, in fact, we all know that all comprehensive writing is three points, write a little bit of each point, first write the views in the reading materials, and then listen to them in a targeted way, it will be better. Also, you can prepare a template for comprehensive writing

Such a high score ... Composition is mainly vocabulary and the use of holdings, so let's translate it more.

The language and organization of the article are generally OK, but there are a few things that I personally think should be paid attention to.

1.It's good to be able to make the point clear with a concession in the first paragraph, but don't you think it's a little awkward? It's generally accepted that you can get to know someone from a friend, and then say, you don't agree with that.

Of course, there is an argument below your point, but why is that affirmative point of view accepted by everyone? I mean, after the first sentence is finished, there should be a detail that should follow. For example:

There is no doubt that one can get to know that person from one's friends because people follow their habitual way when choosing their friends. The latter one can't be saved. I'm just giving you an example, which may not be appropriate, but that's what it means.

2.There's no ending, dear. It is necessary to summarize the whole text and click on the topic again.

The person can be known through their friends. I thought first, this sentence must be fine, such as retired old people and children. Older people like to go out with people who have their own hobbies, and so do children.

This has a sub-argument again.,Write about the old man separately.。。。 Child.. Again, isn't that true of everybody?

No, because there are many people who like to make friends with people who are diametrically opposed to them, such as one of your classmates... So the conclusion is: it can't be said that everyone can see personality through friends.

Whether or not you can get to know a person through a friend depends on the person's principles of friendship and his personality.

I hope to continue the exchange.