Was Darwin s theory of evolution wrong, was Darwin s theory of evolution overthrown?

In 1837, Darwin used a hypothetical tree to sketch the evolution of species for the first time. This concept soon became a hallmark of the theory of evolution by natural selection. But scientists now say Darwin's signature "evolutionary tree of life" showing the relationship of species in evolutionary history is wrong and needs to be replaced by a new theory.

Now genetics shows that it is wrong to use trees as a proxy for evolutionary history. Scientists say a more realistic way to represent the origin of species and the interrelationships between species would be a dense shrub. Eric Butterst, an evolutionary biologist at the University of Paris VI in France, told New Scientist magazine:

We simply have no basis to justify the tree of life. ”

A growing number of bacterial, animal and plant genetic tests have shown that heterogeneous mating is much more than we previously thought, which means that genes are not simply passed on to individual branches of the tree of life, but also switch between species in different evolutionary paths. The result is a disorganized and more tangled "web of life".

The bacterial exchange gene material is so mixed that it can be difficult to distinguish one bacteria from another. Plants and animals also often interbreed and the mating products may be fertile. It is estimated that 10% of animals give birth to "mixed-blood" animals when they live with other species.

Last year, scientists at the University of Texas in Arlington, USA, discovered a peculiar DNA in the genetic portfolio of eight animals, including house mice, wild mice and African clawed frogs. This is DNA that chickens, elephants, and humans don't have, which means that it must have been formed by the genome of some animals through cross-breeding.

This new discovery means that it would be too simple to connect species with Darwin's evolutionary branches. Michael Rose, an evolutionary biologist at the University of California, Irvine, said: "The tree of life is being dug and buried.

While some people don't admit it, our view of the whole foundation of living things needs to change. ”(

Darwin's German pulleys were flawed, but not entirely wrong.

Darwin's theory of evolution has come a long way from Lamarck's theory of evolution.

His "Origin of Species" expounded the theory of biological evolution with the theory of natural selection as the main content, which dealt a heavy blow to creationism and the theory of invariance of species. It was also one of the three major discoveries of natural science in the 19th century.

His main ideas of "natural selection, survival of the fittest" and "natural selection" gave great inspiration to future generations to study biological evolution, and thus became the founder of modern evolutionary theory.

However, his views also fall short. It is reflected in the following three points:

1。Genetic variation is not well explained.

2。The study was limited to individuals and did not rise to the population.

3。The species explosion is not well explained.

Although there are some shortcomings, the significance of Darwinian evolution cannot be obscured, and its main point is correct. Therefore, it cannot be said that Darwinian evolution is a fallacy.

It cannot be regarded as completely correct, because Darwin's theory of evolution is limited by the times and cannot explain where the shape variation of animals comes from, until Mendel discovered genes, and the object of study is the individual, and there is no group as the object of study, and Darwin's theory of evolution cannot explain the phenomenon of large species.

The theory of evolution is just a hypothesis, and it has not been proven to be correct until now, such as how the first cells on the earth were created, and if you can't understand how the first cells came into being, how can we talk about evolution. The 21st century is scientifically advanced.

It's just that Darwin's theory of ape evolution has been overthrown, and with the progress of the times, it is quite normal for some theories to be overturned!

It is estimated that in this world, in addition to being interested in whether there are aliens in the universe, what human beings are most interested in is how they came to be, in fact, there will be stories telling us since childhood, as the descendants of Yan and Huang, we are all created by Nuwa, and Westerners are all created by God.

Although the statements are different, it is enough to see that the most official way for human beings to care about the origin is Darwin's "Theory of Evolution". In the last century, when Darwin first proposed the theory of evolution, it was questioned by many people, and although it is now generally accepted, some voices of skepticism still exist.

In fact, compared with other theories about the origin of human beings, the origin of species is the most accepted one, because compared with other species, the rate of human evolution is very fast, both in terms of appearance and intelligence. Because human beings have unique characteristics, most people's attitudes towards the origin of species are relatively supportive.

Unlike those who support the origin of species,There are also some people who believe that human beings actually evolved on the basis of some kind of alien civilization, and it is precisely because of this alien civilization that there are current human beings and have a different appearance from other creatures on the earth. That is, these people are overthrowing Darwin's Theory of Evolution.

For such a statement, not to mention scientists, even ordinary people will find such a statement incredible, and scientists have also made a lot of efforts to break this absurd and untrue statement.

Darwin's theory of evolution that man is an ape has been overthrown, and the lack of hominin fossils has also become a fatal wound, because there are no hominin fossils around 10,000 years old found around the world, and more strange human fossils, such as giant bones, have been found and it is impossible to explain why orangutans have remained the same for thousands of years.

Darwin's theory of evolution states that man evolved from apes, but that human blood is the same as that of apesThere are also many differences in the blood structure of monkeys, and from a biological point of view, the genetic overlap between humans and pigs is more than 90 percent.

From a biological point of view, scientists are currently able to conclude that humans and pigs are better than humansIt is closer to apes, of course, in a few years, because of the development of science and technology, many discoveries may make us more aware of the evolution process of organisms! But there is no reliable evidence that humans evolved from apes!

So now you know what Darwin's theory of evolution will be overturned!

Just looking at the title, many readers may object, because from biology textbooks, it is said that biology evolves step by step to higher organisms, and Darwin is the originator of biological evolution. In fact, Darwin's theory of biological evolution is only a hypothesis, and there is not enough evidence to show that Darwin's theory of biological evolution is correct.

Maybe biology is evolution, but evolution can also be divided into many kinds, and Darwin's theory of evolution is just one of them. You can go deeper into the theory of evolution, and it is best to get to the bottom of it. If from the perspective of physics, particles are in irregular motion, and objects are always stationary or moving in a straight line at a uniform speed without external forces, from the perspective of physics, the theory of evolution does not seem to work.

There may be many friends who will say, isn't there still chemistry? Organisms are born from organic matter, but if different substances are put together, at most new substances will be produced, and new substances will not be alive, can different substances really form a single cell randomly?

If biological evolution is only genetic mutations, and genetic mutations are mostly harmful, if it is random mutations to form evolution, then how can humans and many land animals not mutate their wings. Or to mutate into a useless and harmless organ, so that it does not affect the survival of the organism, then this organism should also be able to exist in large numbers. It is precisely that almost all organs of humans and animals are useful, and genetic mutations are so coincidental that no neutral organs are mutated?

Secondly, evolution is a little bit of evolution or leapfrog evolution, because there is no intermediate material of living things on the earth, assuming that horses are evolved by cows, why are there no creatures like horses and cows in the middle? Do intermediate species have to die? In fact, human beings also want to fly in the sky like birds, but human beings may have thought about it for thousands of years, but in the end they did not evolve wings, and evolution is not determined by human consciousness.

Perhaps exhaustion and waste are closer to the theory of biological evolution, but the use of waste and waste is only an evolutionary phenomenon, but there is no answer to what factors lead to biological evolution.