Excuse me, which one is credible, evolutionism and creationism?

From a scientific point of view, of course, the theory of evolution is credible, because there is a lot of scientific evidence to confirm it. But for religious people, they choose to believe in creationism, and since it is their religion, there is no need to blame anything.

Both evolution and creationism are scientific theories, and both of them are supported by some scientific evidence, but they also have some unsolved questions and unexplained facts. Therefore, it is impossible to say absolutely which is more credible.

From a scientific point of view, the theory of evolution is a theory that explains biological evolution and species diversity through the study and analysis of a large number of biological samples, as well as the observation and study of biological phenomena such as natural selection, genetic mutation, and species migration. It has been confirmed by many scientific experiments and observations, including the fossil record, genetic studies, biogeography, and more.

Creationism, on the other hand, is based on religious beliefs or philosophical views that life was created by a supernatural force. While it also has historical and cultural importance, it has not been proven or proven in terms of scientific evidence and logical reasoning.

However, science does not solve all problems, nor can it solve all problems. Therefore, beliefs and philosophical perspectives can also play an important role in people's lives.

In conclusion, science and faith are two different fields that have different methods and criteria for evaluating evidence and reasoning. Therefore, it is necessary to consider different perspectives and approaches according to different backgrounds and needs in order to draw more comprehensive and accurate conclusions.

[Human] evolution, evolution, creationism, alien creation, virtuality.

The theory of evolution is not right, if we understand that monkeys have become, then how we are human beings, the process of evolution should be seen by me, but we see this is not the case. So I think we know what God created. Believe in creationism. In the West, the theory of evolution has been scientifically denied.

Now scientists are more supportive of the extraterrestrial claim.

It's really hard to figure out ......However, the biggest loophole in the theory of evolution is its unverifiability, because there are too many coincidences in the appearance of living beings, and there is almost only a 1 in 100 billion chance of living things, and it is very strange why they will follow the "right path" of the emergence of living things

Thomas's five-way argument proves creation.

The theory of evolution holds that species originated in nature, and that species synthesized organic matter from inorganic matter, and organic matter synthesized life. Creationism holds that species were created by God and did not evolve naturally. There are many creationist legends around the world.

The creation of human beings by Nuwa in China, the legend of Adam and Eve in the Western world, etc.

Now research has found that there are many doubts about the theory of evolution that cannot be explained. Archaeological evidence points to the Cambrian explosion of life, with the emergence of many species in just 20 million years. Why do these species occur so intensively in one time period?

According to the theory of evolution, biological evolution should be gradual, then there should be a lot of intermediate species, and the evolution is continuous, the fact is that the morphology of species is very stable. Moreover, it is difficult for the theory of evolution to explain which comes first, the chicken or the egg.

Modern genetic technology can create new species from the genes of living organisms. This suggests that we can create species, and that humans are now gods in a sense. As long as genetic technology continues to be developed, then one day human beings can create a new world, and new species will emerge explosively.

Creationism is also called Creationism. Creationism holds that all species in the living world, including humans, as well as celestial bodies and the earth, were created by God. Mainly in terms of the origin of the universe, evolution.

The modern academic community basically believes that the universe originated from the big **, and time and space began from this singularity. Then the universe evolves. The question arises, what was the big ** like before, why did the big ** happen, there are too many people who don't look at the analysis, and can't even imagine.

Someone found that the big ** has an external push, what is it, it can only be said that God. This is creationism.

Modern modernization, genetic mutation, and heredity, natural selection seem to be able to explain everything. But the evolutionary process is arranged by time, and it is found that there are too many loopholes, like an invisible ** is pushing. For example, the Cambrian biological **, in a short period of time, the sudden explosion of biological species, Darwin was puzzled by this for a lifetime.

The other is the generation of human beings, especially the generation of human intelligence. It is generally believed that apes evolved from humans, but from the archaeological evidence, it seems that a passage has been missed. Or someone suddenly pushed.

Especially the generation of wisdom.

Engels said that it was produced by labor, which was very political.

Hello. Evolutionism.

One of the biggest flaws is that there is no evidence. This is Darwin.

In their own "On the Origin of Species".

explicitly mentions. In the book, Darwin admits that there is no evidence to prove his thesis, but he is optimistic that more and more fossils will be excavated in the future to prove his theory. Unfortunately, countless fossils have been unearthed today, but none of them reflect evolving organisms.

The most commonly used as evidence is Archaeopteryx.

fossils, but it has been proven to be 100 percent bird, and even today, there are still birds with claws at the wings, and the teeth have never been to distinguish birds from reptiles.

indicators. On the contrary, a large number of so-called "living fossils" have dealt a fatal blow to the theory of evolution, because the "fossil ancestors" of living organisms are fundamentally no different from the descendants who are living now. The second major flaw in the theory of evolution is that it violates the basic principles of genetics.

There was no systematic study of genetics in Darwin's time. Darwin observed evolution from the perspective of the external environment, but in fact, the reason why there is such a phenomenon of evolution is genetically determined. In Darwin's theory of evolution, the difference between the same species is not the creation of new genes, but the elimination of some genes due to environmental reasons.

For example, Darwin observed ground finches with different beak shapes in the Galapas Islands, in fact, because the environment on different islands was suitable for thick and slender beak finch, so that other ground finches moved to other islands (because this island was not suitable for their survival), and gradually all ground finches on one island had the same beak shape (genetically identical), and their offspring were all the same beak type. But the problem is that at the genetic level, this phenomenon is a loss of genetic information (the ground finch on an island only retains the gene for one beak), which is not evolution, because no new genes are produced, only some genes are missing. The third greatest flaw of the theory of evolution is that it conceals the essence of its religion under the cloak of science.

Its theory has a presupposition, that is, "as long as it takes long enough, everything is possible", and this premise cannot be questioned, but is this premise reasonable? Darwin himself was actually more cautious, writing in the last sentence of On the Origin of Species: "The first life, then, was breathed ...... by the Creator."Whatever the reason for writing like this, it is clear that Darwin did not and did not want to deal with the question of the origin of life at all, his staunch follower Huxley.

The same is true. But later people used the theory of evolution to deny God's creation, and in this way, the theory of evolution degenerated from a hypothesis (theory**) with a certain positive meaning to a clumsy religion, and Huxley also realized this, and he always called people not to do it. In fact, both from the fossil evidence (the catastrophe - the burial of the flood), genetics (has been recognized by all scientists:

Human beings share a common ancestor), or ordinary logic (behind order and precision is intelligent design, the universe and life are order and precision, so there are intelligent designers), this world was created by a supernatural designer, which is the most reasonable, scientific, and credible explanation. Hope it helps.

Not credible. Life changes in small dimensions, but in large dimensions, many propositions in evolution are conjectures, not scientific conclusions.

The theory of evolution is a hypothesis, and it is a relatively good theory to explain in the current scientific field.

There are a lot of loopholes, but there is no good theory to follow.

Creationism is no longer a science.