Consult the lawyers I am very urgent, consult the lawyers

Supplements: 1. Bone hyperplasia cannot be caused by lifting things at one time. "Lumbar degeneration" is also likely to be the result of long-term accumulation.

2. In the future, the other party may sue and the court will settle the matter without paying the fee, and the other party shall provide evidence to prove that the injury was caused or induced by work.

1. To count work-related injuries, the unit should pay for the operation, and should also pay for nursing expenses, food subsidies, etc.

The reason is that if a worker is injured during working hours, in the workplace, or because of work-related reasons, it should be a work-related injury.

1) [Injured in an accident during working hours and in the workplace due to work-related reasons;]2) Injured in an accident while engaged in work-related preparatory or finishing work in the workplace before or after working hours;(3) Suffering violence or other accidental injuries during working hours and in the workplace due to the performance of work duties;(4) Suffering from occupational diseases;(5) During the period when they are out for work, they are injured due to work reasons or their whereabouts are unknown in an accident;(6) Being injured in a motor vehicle accident while commuting to or from work;(7) Other circumstances that laws and administrative regulations provide shall be recognized as work-related injuries.

2. However, it should be noted whether the employee had the old disease of lumbar disc herniation before the injury, and if it was the original disease, the unit should be responsible for compensating for the aggravated part of the injury.

You and I should apply for a work-related injury determination, and it doesn't matter if you say it.

If the above answer is satisfactory, thank you!

You need to ask the doctor if the condition is caused entirely by work, if it is not the company's responsibility, if the work has no effect on the occurrence of the disease, the company has no responsibility.

Article 14 (1) of the Regulations on Work-related Injury Insurance stipulates that a person who is injured during working hours or in the place of work due to work-related reasons shall be deemed to have suffered a work-related injury. If it is a work-related injury medical accident, the medical expenses shall be reimbursed by the work-related injury insurance, and if the employer fails to pay the work-related injury insurance for the employee, the employer shall pay for it.

It is a work-related injury, but because there may be a disease in the body itself, the work-related injury is only one of the triggers, and the proportion of work-related injuries can apply for forensic examination.

1. The gift money "requested" by the woman can be returned, and the guarantee is invalid because it violates the principle of freedom of marriage.

2. After collecting and organizing relevant evidence, the court will be directly sued.

Thank you for your valuable advice, I asked my family to sort out the materials.

You can sue for the money back. And such a guarantee is a guarantee of invalidity.

If you do not live together, you can ask for a refund. The so-called guarantee is also invalid, and citizens have the freedom to divorce.

Thank. But he said that he just has no money now, he wants no money, he wants to die, and he is not afraid of passing the court, saying that the court can't help him.

I would like to please, is this possible?

Of course, the possibility exists, then it is up to the parties themselves, everything is risky, either you admit to loss, or you will sue.

In today's second-hand housing market, the last house basically entrusts a number of intermediary companies to list the first house. Therefore, when an intermediary company clarifies the intention of the upper and lower families to buy and sell, it will try its best to require the next family to pay a purchase intention before signing the house sale contract. After handing over the intention money to the upper family, the intermediary company can obtain the original two certificates of the upper family.

However, after signing the letter of intent to purchase a house or paying the intent money, if the buyer and seller fail to succeed in the transaction for various reasons, the intermediary and the upper and lower parties will often have disputes over the refund of the intent money. The relevant national real estate laws and regulations are called deposits, security deposits, and liquidated damages, but there is no mention of intent money.

The risks are there, but do you think there is a better way to go through litigation if you don't go through litigation? If there is no better way, get the judgment in favor of the case first.