Friend, what do you think of Cao Cao, how do you evaluate Cao Cao as a person?

Personally, I think that Cao Cao's conduct can't be compared with those who are virtuous and virtuous in history, but it's still quite good. The most important point is that in such an era, since Cao Cao can come out to save the people from fire and water, and let the people live a more comfortable life, this is virtue, and it is the great virtue of life.

Although this virtue also serves his interests--- isn't there a saying that a person makes the greatest contribution to mankind in the process of pursuing the maximization of his own value? Cao Cao is like this, as long as we work hard, we can do the same. )

1.Cao Cao is not an honest person, but a pragmatic person. It is impossible for a person like this to say that his conduct is noble, but his conduct is not bad, at least he knows how to make himself appear to be on the side of morality, and in a sense, he can also be said to be on the side of justice.

I think this is largely the reason why Cao Cao did not become emperor in the end. Imagine that if Cao Cao was the emperor, there would be no need to discuss his character today.

2.Cao Cao was a good husband and father. After his achievements, he did not abandon his original wife; And several sons are also talented. These can at least reflect Cao Cao's character from the side.

3.Virtue, what is virtue? If Cao Cao hadn't come out to fight for hegemony, be at peace with the world, and do nothing, we might not know him at all.

Or Cao Cao was virtuous and finally ceded power to Emperor Xian of the Han Dynasty, what was the result? I think that the image of Yue Fei we are talking about today is probably Cao Cao. Cao Cao once said:

Try to make there be no one in the world, I don't know how many people are emperors! At least this point is recognized by everyone, and Liu Bei was the first emperor in the Three Kingdoms, so it can be seen that he is a good man. Yes, Cao Cao may also have the idea of becoming emperor, but people didn't do that.

If we have desires, we will inevitably have undivided thoughts, but it does not mean that your character is bad.

The capable man who rules the world, the hero of the troubled times!

Ambitious and suspicious.

But also a talent.

Suspicious, but appreciative of talent.

Thirsty. Ambitious.

Heroes, heroes, and high-spirited people!!

A bit treacherous. But it's very moral.

Very strong, that's all.

The simpler the better.

The evaluation of Cao Cao is all influenced by Yi Zhongtian! I hope that friends can come up with their own opinions.

Heroes are also one.

Every hero has a lot of weaknesses ...

It is recommended that you buy Yi Zhongtian's "Three Kingdoms" That book is very comprehensive Li Ao seems to have written a book Read it It is helpful for writing and history.

Cao Cao is a historical figure who has the advantages of a group of friends, with shortcomings, great credit, and no small sin, from a comprehensive view of the problem, the overall evaluation should be more merit than sin, but we can't, and we don't need to say that his sin is too meritorious because of his merit, and many people in the past did not say that he was guilty of too much

He has evaluated many strategists in his life, but he has not mentioned Zhuge Liang at all.

Cao Cao was a great statesman, military strategist, and poet. During the Three Kingdoms period when he was competing for hegemony, he unified the entire north by himself when his background was not too good, and he was a very talented person.

Cao Cao was both civil and military, eloquent and strategic, and was a very outstanding military strategist and statesman.

Cao Cao was a hero, his strength was very strong, and his political and military abilities could be said to be at the top level among the Three Kingdoms.