Recommendations for the compatibility and rationality of AMD configurations! Thank you!

My classmate has only recently equipped the machine, 5000+, Gigabyte MA78GM-S2HP, 2G, 250G hard disk, no graphics card, but you don't need a graphics card, my classmate's machine is no problem playing CrossFire (3D games), for you, it's completely enough! Kingston is recommended for memory, and Seagate is for hard drive, both of which are the best choices! If you feel that the 250g hard drive is not enough, change to a 320g or 500g one!

Power supply with Huntkey Cool King Enhanced Edition! Choose any case, because I said a certain one is good, and you may not have it there in the end! In the end, it was definitely less than two thousand!

amd 5000+ 370

Gigabyte MA770 S3 480

Kingston 2G DDR2 800 130

Hitachi 500g 350

Onda 9600GSO 384M 480

Power Huntkey Cold Drill Vista 210 Chassis Optional.

ASRock (a 100% owned subsidiary of ASUS) 790GX 599 is much better than your motherboard.

Motherboard replacement for GIGABYTE GA-MA770-DS3 (rev..)Because it's an all-solid-state 770I think you should understand the benefits of all-solid. Not much to say. Now **559Very good.

Power supply I recommend you to use the Kangshu F1 350 rated 300W now 219Very good. You can look it up online and see why I recommend it.

Brainless people are just clouds.

Uncle and I have used more than a dozen sets of PCs with different configurations for more than 20 years. Including Intel's Celeron 433 of the same generation as the Pentium 2, the Celeron D 325 of the same generation as the Pentium 3 and the same generation as the Pentium 4, the Pentium E 5300, the Xeon E 5420, the Core 2 Q9400, the Pentium G 2030, the Core i3-3220, the Core i3-6100, the Core i5-8500, etc., AMD's K6-2 500, the Poison Dragon 800, the Athlon XP 2500+, the Athlon 64 3000+, the Athlon 64 X2 5000+ Black Box Edition, Ryzen II X3 B73, Ryzen II X6 1055T, Ryzen R5 3600, etc.

After using so many CPUs, I didn't find any obvious compatibility problems (I have never found that a certain software or application can only work under Intel's platform, and the AMD platform at the same time cannot work properly, except for niche and very unpopular professional applications), and it can run normally.

So the question is, what do you mean by your so-called bad compatibility? How is it performed?

Of course, due to AMD's relative weakness in the past, limited financial resources, and insufficient sponsorship of game manufacturers, most games are very well optimized for Intel's CPU, and AMD's CPU optimization is insufficient or even not specifically optimized, and even a few games will be negatively optimized. As a result, AMD CPUs have performed poorly in games for a long time.

However, it's not that it's incompatible, it's just that the game performance is a little worse, and it's just that the frame rate is lower and the smoothness is a little worse.

People who say that AMD's processor compatibility is not good are either stupid or bad.

In most cases, there is no noticeable difference, and crashes occur in some niche software or games. AMD's blue screen odds are high. If you want to stabilize the recommendation is Intel or the latest AMD processor!!

AMD's compatibility is not bad. It's just that game manufacturers don't optimize the processors of A-card and AMD well. To put it bluntly, AMD processors play games.

Other game manufacturers optimize N cards with Intel processors that are better than AMD's. The main reason was that Intel and N cards were the mainstream at that time, and Nvidia and Intel were also willing to spend money to cooperate with major game manufacturers to optimize games to occupy the console market of gamers. So many people say that AMD has poor compatibility with games.

In fact, to put it bluntly, most of the software, the game is not optimized for AMD.

There are more people who personally pass another day after another.