Philosophically speaking, time has no beginning and no end

If time has a beginning, what is it relative to before the beginning?

There is no beginning or end to time, which is the meaning of philosophy.

In the origin of the universe, it is said that the universe was produced in a big **, but for the **before, what it was, no one knows at present, and everyone is guessing, but before that, there must be something in some form, whether time can measure the scale of the above existence, depending on the strength of the universe, whether time is the product of the universe?

It can be understood in this way that before **, space-time chaos, that is, the time dimension was not completely separated or formed, in short, it cannot be understood by our current concept. So what we are talking about now is that the definition of time did not exist before **, but what was the situation before that, no one knows at present.

The universe does not have the concept of time and time, and time is nothing more than the scope of our human activities. Put it into the universe, it's nothing, it's empty! It's like daytime, noon, and night, and that's just an abstract concept that exists in the human brain.

You run into space, where there is no day or night, and there is no sunrise or sunset.

Time is an empty and abstract concept

It has no beginning and no end, and the concept of time is provided to it by human beings through their minds, and human beings divide time into early, middle and late and divide it on this level of meaning

Time is the relative amount of motion of matter in the universe, the time of the total universe has, the past, present and the future, the past time and the future time are relatively infinite, but the time of the earth where we are located is present relative to the sun, because the sun and the earth will die in billions of years, the total universe is eternal, galaxies are constantly dying and regenerating, and the form of existence of the universe is constantly evolving

Time is a thing that humans themselves have made up.

In fact, there is no time in the world.

This is the human explanation for the phenomenon of change with things.

When something changes.

It is claimed that this thing has changed over time.

Whether present or eternal is correct, time is a feature of the world itself. This is the traditional fundamental view of time. But Kant.

in its novel epistemology.

, rejecting this traditional view of time, which he argues is only a feature of the human way of knowing, not the world itself (the object itself).

characteristics. Kant asserted that time and space are both frameworks for the mind to know the world. This framework indicates what kind of characteristics the mind has, not the characteristics of the world itself.

But whether Kant is right or the conventional wisdom is right, time still leaves us with many questions to be solved. In the Kantian view of time, it is incumbent upon to depict how such a characteristic of the mind of time is consistent with the seemingly external time experienced in the everyday. More difficult, it may also require some speculative explanation of the nature of the mind.

If the world itself does not have the characteristic of time, then what is the world itself? What is a mind with such characteristics? These explanations are necessarily far from our common sense and are hardly convincing without strong arguments.

These questions are simply categorized as metaphysics beyond human epistemic capacity.

Categories do not stifle people's intellectual curiosity.

The difficulties faced by the traditional view of time are no more difficult than those of the Kantian one. What kind of entity or nature of time is, and how it relates to the human way of knowing, are extremely difficult questions. It is also necessary to address specific issues related to time, such as the persistence of the things mentioned earlier.

A reminder here is that Kant fully embraced Newton.

of physics, of course, including Newtonian physics in the concept of space-time. The difference between Kant's and Newton's view of time is simply that Kant interprets this absolute time as an innate form of knowledge of the mind, while Newton sees it as a form of the external world.

Philosophical words mainly talk about the problem of time and space, but in fact, the height of the rise is different, and it is not the same as our thinking.

For society, time does not begin or end.

And time has a beginning and an end for every independent person.

The so-called beginning is the beginning of birth, and the so-called end is the moment of death.

And this kind of beginning and end is not subject to human will, as the so-called people can't control their own life and death, there is no need to dwell on the beginning and end of time, everything will be natural and not troubled!