The small treasury divides the money, but the manager does not take more, should it be punished??

It should be punished. In the past 10 years, the state has successively issued a number of laws and regulations, such as the "Regulations on Strengthening the Management of Funds and Strictly Prohibiting the Establishment of Small Treasuries (Trial)", "Regulations on the Management of Group Companies Strictly Prohibiting the Establishment of "Small Treasuries", and so on. The issue of "small coffers" is explicitly prohibited.

In the actual management of work, the state organs, enterprises (groups) and institutions are prohibited from setting up "small treasuries" without permission, and more than once the work of cleaning up "small treasuries" has been carried out nationwide.

As the direct manager of the "small treasury", he should be aware of the serious irregularities of the "small treasury" problem. However, instead of taking appropriate measures to eliminate, stop, and report the "small treasury", the managers participated in the financial division, which in itself was a serious mistake.

According to the provisions of Articles 151 and 152 of the Criminal Law, if the amount of public or private property defrauded is relatively large, the amount involved in the case of the small treasury constitutes the crime of fraud. Where an individual defrauds public or private property of more than 2,000 yuan, it is a "relatively large amount"; Where an individual defrauds more than 30,000 yuan of private property, it is a "huge amount". The High People's Courts of all provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government may, on the basis of the economic development of the region, and considering the state of public security, respectively determine the "relatively large amount" or "huge amount" of individual fraud carried out in that region, as well as the fraud committed by units, and pursue the criminal responsibility of the relevant personnel, and with reference to the amount provided for in paragraph 4 of this article, to determine the specific amount standards for applying article 151 or 152 of the Criminal Law. and report to the Supreme People's Court for the record.

Legal Analysis: Serious cases will be expelled from the party.

Legal basis: Interpretation of Several Issues Concerning the Application of Disciplinary Violations in the Establishment of "Small Treasury" and the Use of "Small Treasury" Funds

Article 9: Where there is conduct in establishing a 'small treasury' or using 'small treasury' funds, and there are other disciplinary violations other than those provided for in this interpretation that need to be handled together, the relevant responsible personnel are to be pursued for responsibility in accordance with article 25 of the "Chinese Communist Party Disciplinary Sanctions Regulations".

Article 11: Where there is an act of setting up a "small treasury" or using funds from a "small treasury", and the circumstances are relatively minor, and it is possible to conscientiously self-examine and correct itself in accordance with relevant provisions, sanctions may be waived. Where there is conduct in setting up a "small treasury" or using "small treasury" funds, and the circumstances are more serious, but they can be self-examined and self-corrected in accordance with relevant provisions, the punishment may be commuted or mitigated. Where there is an act of setting up a "small gold annihilation macro treasury" or using the funds of a "small treasury", and the circumstances are serious, but they can self-examine and correct themselves in accordance with relevant provisions, they may be given a lighter punishment.

Regulations on Disciplinary Sanctions of the Communist Party of China" Article 25: Where two or more persons (including two persons) jointly and intentionally violate discipline, the leader is to be given a heavier sanction, except as otherwise provided in these Regulations; Other members are to be punished separately in accordance with their role and responsibilities in the joint violation of discipline. For those who jointly violate discipline in the economic field, they shall be punished separately according to the amount of personal income and the role they play. The ringleaders of the group that violated discipline shall be punished according to the total amount of the group's disciplinary violations; Where the circumstances are serious, the other leaders who jointly violate discipline are to be punished in accordance with the total amount of the joint violation.

Those who instigate others to violate discipline shall be pursued for Party discipline responsibility in accordance with their role in the joint violation of discipline.