Let s talk about it with those who don t agree with me

The singularity existed in space-time before the occurrence of the universe.

The idea is peculiar, original, and logical. Brother admires your reasoning.

But as for the dimensionality of time, it's hard to say.

In my opinion, time is really a meaningless thing that God uses to confuse and control things that make it difficult for us to get. In fact, time is the process of exercise, and without exercise, time is meaningless. Opinion, blind imagination.

But I still admire your clever logical thinking.

I don't think that the second hypothesis is only based on imagination, and the theory of relativity and quantum mechanics can only be harmonized on the plane of superstring high-dimensional theory, in other words, the high-dimensional hypothesis is a hypothesis of scientific attitude.

What I disagree with is that LZ says that the space-time we are in is three-dimensional space + 1-dimensional time, I think we only live in three-dimensional space, because we can only live at the next point in time, that is, the 0-dimensional time point, we can't walk on the axis of time 1-dimensional, so this 1-dimensional is not there, time is 0-dimensional, we are in three-dimensional space and constantly changing 0-dimensional time points.

Reminds me of parallel universes.

Of course, the 2 of the 2ll dimension (if it exists) should not represent the plane, I feel that it should represent the parallel existence of the plane of three-dimensional space in two-dimensional time.

I'm confused myself--

Time is a speed difference, this is my absolute understanding, don't try to change my mind!

I agree with the upstairs upstairs.

The pf landlord held up.

Forehead... I want to ask, is your second speculation influenced by which science fiction **?

I admire your imagination, but I don't agree completely.

What you say in the second point is that both time and space are produced by motion, and this statement is completely true. This sentence can be all theories related to time and space.

In order to verify the correctness of this view, we can assume that there is a universe in which there are only two particles, and when the two particles are relatively stationary, the time and space of the universe lose their physical meaning, that is, they do not exist, for example, time, which can be seen as both passing by and stopping, so time does not exist, and so does space. When two particles have relative motion, time and space appear immediately, that is, time and space have physical meaning. ）

The existence of time and space has nothing to do with the explosion of the universe. It is only related to motion, if the "great ** theory" is established, then if there is still movement before **, then there is time and space, but what the singularity is before the **, no one knows yet, and no one knows whether there is movement at the singularity. Theoretically, the singularity is infinitely small, and infinitesimal things cannot have an internal structure (if any, they are not infinitesimally small).

Regarding multidimensional space-time, I think your point of view is a bit taken for granted, first of all, the reason why space is divided into three dimensions is entirely because people overtrust mathematics, and there can be no universe that is one-dimensional (or two-dimensional) space, so space is space, time is time, and there is no latitude at all (this paragraph is completely my personal opinion, but I firmly believe that my view is correct).

The reason for this is that God has said, "I just want to make the world simpler."

I agree with your first assumption, which is in line with dialectical materialist thinking. If space-time originated from a singularity, it is equivalent to thinking that time and space before the big ** were static, and any concept of stillness and isolation to look at the universe is hardly convincing.

But I think your second assumption is too detached from reality, and if your point of view is based on imagination out of thin air, I am afraid that you will not even be able to talk about hypothesis, because hypothesis is a possible explanation of a phenomenon, and if there is no phenomenon, then anyone can come up with n theories.

I think so:

The so-called singularity is just that the laws of our universe are not available, and the previous universe still exists.

As for dimensions, I think there are countless elements in the universe (time, space, force, "mind", etc.). And every element has an infinite number of dimensions. (Is that possible?) ）

1. You agree, he disagrees.

Meaning: you agree, he disagrees. It is an affirmative sentence.

2. Do you agree? He disagreed.

Meaning: Do you agree? He disagreed. It belongs to the question sentence plus the affirmative sentence.

3. Do you agree with him? Disagree.

Meaning: Do you agree with him? Disagree. It belongs to the question sentence plus the affirmative sentence.

4. Do you agree with him or not?

Meaning: Do you agree with him? It is an interrogative sentence.

A sentence that makes an affirmative judgment about something is called an affirmative sentence. General interrogative sentences are usually used to ask whether a thing is true or not.

The answer is usually "yes" or "no". Therefore, the general question sentence is also called the "yes or no question".

You agree that he disagrees" punctuation means :

1. You agree, he disagrees.

2. Do you agree with him or not?

3. Do you agree with him? Agreed.

4. Do you agree with him? Disagree.

5 , do you agree with him ?

6. Do you agree with him? Agreed.

7. Do you agree? He disagreed.

Punctuation classification:

1. Dot:

The function of the dot is to break the dot, mainly to indicate the pause and tone of voice when speaking. The dot mold Li is divided into a period at the end of the sentence and a period at the end of the sentence.

The dot at the end of the sentence is used at the end of the sentence to indicate the pause at the end of the sentence and the tone of the sentence, including periods, question marks, and exclamation marks.

Periods are used in sentences to indicate pauses of different natures in sentences, including commas, pauses, semicolons, and colons.

2. Labeling:

The function of the label is to indicate, mainly to indicate the specific nature and function of certain components (mainly words). Includes quotation marks, parentheses, dashes, ellipsis, accents, hyphens, spacers, titles, proper names, and size separators.

1. You agree, he disagrees. Meaning: you agree, he disagrees. It is an affirmative sentence.

2. Do you agree? He disagreed. Meaning: Do you agree? He disagreed. It belongs to the question of suspected lead Qinghua plus affirmative sentence.

3. Do you agree with him? Disagree. Meaning: Do you agree with him? Disagree. It belongs to the question sentence plus the affirmative sentence.

4. Do you agree with him or not? Meaning: Do you agree with him? It is an interrogative sentence.

There are 16 main interrogative pronouns:

1. There are 8 main questions about things, time, place and quantity: who, what, what, where, **, when, how much.

2. There are 8 main ways to ask, traits and reasons: how, how, how, how, why.

There are four main modal words: ?, what, bar, ah.

There are 10 main adverbs of interrogation: what is wrong, how is it, unexpectedly, unexpectedly, in the end, simply, no wonder, on the contrary, what is it, why bother.

1. You agree, he disagrees.

It means that you agree and he disagrees, which is an affirmative sentence.

2. Do you agree with him or not?

Does it mean that you agree and he disagrees? It's an interrogative sentence.

3. Do you agree with him? Agreed.

Meaning: Do you agree with him? Agreed. It is an interrogative sentence plus an affirmative sentence.

4. Do you agree? He disagreed.

Meaning: Do you agree? He disagreed. It is an interrogative sentence plus an affirmative sentence.

Interrogative sentences are a class divided according to the tone of sentences, and the biggest difference between them and declarative sentences, exclamatory sentences, and imperative sentences is its interrogative tone; It's asking about something, and what is expressed is not a statement, so it's uncertain.

A sentence that makes an affirmative judgment about something is called an affirmative sentence.