If the money is not returned, how much economic loss does it need to bear as a middleman?

If the money is not returned, as a middleman, there is a certain amount of joint and several liability. If you are a guarantor, you will definitely have to pay all the responsibilities.

If the middleman is a guarantee, he will be jointly and severally liable, and if the borrower does not repay the money, he will be fully responsible and repay the lender's money, and if it is just an introduction to the acquaintance of both parties, he will not be liable.

If the money is not returned, as a middleman, how much economic loss you need to bear, it depends on how much the customer's economic loss is, if you are introduced from the middleman, you also have to bear half of the responsibility.

First of all, you have to understand that the middleman is not a guarantor, it is just a platform or intermediary for mutual acquaintance, and specific things still need to be operated by people on both sides, and the judgment of true and false is a personal matter. Just like a scam, if you are deceived, do you still have to hold the telecom company responsible? There is no justification for your claim.

If the money is not prepared back, the middleman will of course need to bear this part of the economic loss. He needs to compensate you.

Hello. This situation needs to be analyzed on a case-by-case basis, and if the intermediary has made a guarantee, then it needs to bear part of the responsibility.

If the money is not returned, then the guarantor also has to bear a certain responsibility, as for how much economic loss you bear, it depends on the contract you signed.

If the money is not returned, how much economic loss does it need to bear if you sit in the middle and introduce it? The middleman must be responsible, and he will probably have to bear part of the loss.

A middleman is just a medium of introduction. If you don't get the money back, it's your own investment. Then let me ask you, if you make a million in your money, will you give it to the middlemen?

It depends on how the loan was agreed at that time? If a contract or IOU is signed, there must be an explanation, and if there is no proof of these legally effective contracts, in fact, the middleman does not have to bear this loss.

If the money is not returned, as a middleman, of course, it is necessary to compensate for the losses caused.

Generally, the most lost is the one who belongs to the money, or does not come back, but if the middleman introduces, he will definitely lose a part.

If the money is not returned, as an intermediary introduction, the economic loss that needs to be borne should be relatively large, and different claims can be made according to the law, and the results of his legal provisions are not the same.

Intermediaries are generally not liable. Unless there is an express agreement at the beginning.

If the money is not returned, how much economic loss do you need to bear as a middleman? This issue can only wait for the law to decide.

If the money is not returned, as an intermediary introduction, how much economic loss need to be borne, the bear is quite large, economic loss, because you introduced it.

If the money is not returned, it is also the responsibility of the middleman. In this case, you also need to lose money in the middle.

If the money is not returned, as a middleman, you need to bear 20% of the economic loss.

The middleman is generally responsible for 50% of the economic loss, and the minimum is 50%.

According to the specific situation, the most money to be recovered will only be less than this.

According to the relevant regulations, the middleman is only an introduction, and does not receive a fee from it, so he does not need to be liable.

If the money is not returned, how much economic loss does it need to bear as an intermediary introduction, subject to the contract, and how was the contract signed at that time?

It depends on whether you have a contract or not, and how it is written.

It mainly depends on how the contract was signed? And then whose responsibility is to pay for what? It's all about it.

It depends on what you do, whether it is a guarantor or a middleman, and the guarantor and the middleman bear the economy differently.

If the money doesn't come back, it will be introduced as a middleman. Of course, he needs to bear a certain amount of economic losses. There is a civilized provision in this law. Please refer to the legal provisions for details.

It depends on whether it has been agreed in advance.

If I don't get my money back as a middleman, he will have to bear all the financial losses.

Summary. Intermediaries are generally not liable if they are not at fault or intentional for fraud or fraud. If the intermediary knows and assists in the fraud, it is generally punished as the crime of fraud.

Hello, I am a cooperative jujube lawyer who consulted, what legal questions can be answered here I have received your questions, there are more people who are currently consulting, please wait for a while, I am helping you solve it.

If the money is not transferred to the middleman, does the middleman need to be responsible after being scammed?

What about people? Why don't you ignore me.

I'm a little anxious if my sister can ignore me.

If the intermediary is not at fault or intentional for fraud or fraud, he is generally not liable for the dismissal. If the middleman knows about the bad situation and assists in the fraud, he will be punished according to the crime of fraud.

Okay thank you. You're welcome.

Then if I just pull the strings, and then they trade privately, the woman is cheated, do I need to be held responsible, sister.

If you just pull the strings and don't know that the other party is **, you don't have to be responsible for their private transactions.

I'm glad to answer Yehe Wang for you this time, if you are satisfied with my above reply, you can give me a like, and click on my avatar to **consult and follow, so that I can shoot socks for you to continue to answer the direction Oh Songzai.