What kind of difference in ability do military commanders and chiefs of staff have?

Let's first clarify a concept for you, the military commander is a general term, taking a theater as an example, the theater commander, deputy commander, chief of staff, including the commander-in-chief of the army, these all belong to the military commander, and the political commissar belongs to the political commander, and generally does not participate in military command, (although it is said that the party commands the gun, taking the group army as an example, theoretically, as long as the army commander is capable, the political commissar can do it, but in fact, the army commander may let the political commissar a few points in peacetime, but if there is a real war, the political commissar can't say anything at all, The commander is the boss) I think what you want to ask should be the difference between the ability of the necro and the chief of staff, the commander is the boss, there is no doubt about this, if there is a war, the commander is responsible for controlling the overall situation and giving orders, the chief of staff and the deputy commander or something, responsible for the specific implementation of orders, occasionally you can give advice, if the commander dies or is sick and cannot command the battle, before the superior does not send a new commander, the chief of staff will generally continue to command, in other words, the chief of staff is the second-in-command.

There may be some differences in the capabilities of military chiefs and chiefs of staff, but specific competency requirements vary depending on the role and responsibilities.

Military commanders usually need to have leadership, decision-making, communication, organization, and execution skills to ensure the combat effectiveness and execution of the troops. They need to lead the troops to complete combat missions and coordinate the relationship between the troops and the ** and civilian organizations at all levels.

Chiefs of staff usually need to have solid knowledge and skills in military theory, including military strategy, operational planning, intelligence analysis, and operational command. They also need to have excellent analytical and communication skills, and be able to provide strong support to military commanders and assist them in the development and implementation of operational plans.

In addition, military chiefs and chiefs of staff need to have leadership and teamwork skills to ensure unity and collaboration within the force.

In conclusion, there will be some differences in the competency requirements of the military chief and the chief of staff, but both need to have excellent leadership and teamwork skills to ensure the combat effectiveness and execution of the troops.

The Chief of Staff is the head of the military command department of the unit at all levels and assists the military commander of the unit in command. For example, the chief of staff of a military region assists the commander of the military region, and the chief of staff of a division assists the division commander in his work. Chiefs of staff are available at all levels above the corps level, including brigades, divisions, group armies, and the Jiaozhao Military Region.

In units below the regimental level, there is only the post of operational staff officer, but there is no post of chief of staff. Only in units at and above the brigade and regimental level are there chiefs of staff. His main duties were to organize information on battles, provide information to military chiefs and make certain recommendations; At the behest of the military chief, specific combat missions were assigned to the units below.

Rank: The chief of staff is equivalent to the deputy position of the military chief of the unit, that is to say, the chief of staff of the regiment is at the deputy regimental level, the chief of staff of the division (brigade) is at the deputy division (brigade) level, the chief of staff of the army is at the deputy army level, and the chief of staff of the military region is equivalent to the deputy commander of the military region.

The deputy chief of the general staff and the commander of the large military region are both at the level of the Zhengda Military Region, the chief of the general staff is a member of the Central Military Commission and enjoys the treatment of deputy national level, and the secretary of the provincial party committee is at the level of a provincial minister. The commander and political commissar of the Zhengda Military Region are equivalent to the secretaries of the provincial party committees of ordinary provinces, and in peacetime, the latter have more power, and the former have more power in wartime.

According to the regulations on the management of military ranks of the People's Liberation Army, the corresponding military rank at the level of the Zhengda Military Region is lieutenant general or general, while the members of the Military Commission must be generals. A member of the Military Commission is equivalent to a member of the State Council (a member of the State Council who is not a member of the Politburo).

The chief of staff is equivalent to the deputy position of the military chief officer of the single position, that is to say, the chief of staff of the Kulaochai regiment is at the deputy regiment level, the chief of staff of the division (brigade) is at the deputy division (brigade) level, the chief of staff of the military staff is at the deputy army level, and the chief of staff of the military region is equivalent to the deputy commander of the military region.

Differences: There are differences in the departments to which they belong, differences in the content of the work, and differences in universality. In the army, both officers and staff officers are soldiers who serve the people.

I have watched many military-themed TV series, and titles such as staff officers, commanders, and officers often appear. So, what's the difference between a staff officer and an officer?

The People's Liberation Army (PLA) has made special provisions on the title of officers in the "Internal Affairs Regulations." Officers are called differently in different types of organs of the armed forces, and the purpose is to facilitate the identification of officers and to facilitate operations and command. For non-leading officers of the organs, those in the military command organs (such as the headquarters) are called staff officers; in political organs (e.g., the Department of Political Affairs); In logistics and equipment organs (e.g., logistics department, equipment department) called assistants.

Pena buried. There are differences in the departments to which they belong:

The People's Liberation Army (PLA) has made special provisions on the title of officers in the "Internal Affairs Regulations." Officers are called differently in different types of organs of the armed forces, and the purpose is to facilitate the identification of officers and to facilitate operations and command. For non-leading officers of the organs, those in the military command organs are called staff officers; In political organs, dust ants are called officers.

There are differences in the content of the work:

Officer, refers to the handling of affairs; A person who specializes in a specialized job. In the military, most of the officers are responsible for party building and political education in party and government organs. Staff officers, as a type of military position, are mostly involved in directing troop operations and formulating battle plans.

There is a difference in universality:

The scope of application of officers is more extensive, and anyone who is dedicated to a certain job can become an officer, and there is also this title in the local **, while the staff officer is only available in the military academy troops.

Staff officers, officers, and assistants are all non-leading cadres of different types of organs of the armed forces, and their work functions are different. With the standardized title of an officer, it is convenient for identification and is conducive to combat and command.

As the saying goes, if a staff officer doesn't have a commander, he won't fart loudly. For example, the chief of staff of a division is the deputy commander.