Please help me, legal questions, help with legal questions, help

A small amount does not constitute an offence and the supermarket does not have the power to seize the goods. If the supermarket wants to ruin your reputation, you can sue him! If you report it to the police, your guardian will definitely be present to negotiate and sign!

If you don't want your family to know, you can only negotiate with the supermarket to solve it. As long as the elders are present, the supermarket sees that you want to knock you out a sum of money, you can ask your uncles, aunts and aunts to come and help you solve it, let them keep it secret. It's all students, and their hearts are heavy about this now, right?

Eat a trench and grow a wisdom, count it as a long insight, you must pay attention in the future, and then let it develop as a fluke mentality, it is said that you will embark on the road of crime, I hope your matter will be solved as soon as possible!

Supermarkets don't have the right to fines, and they don't have the right to seize items, if you want to solve it, it's best to find your parents, don't be afraid, just correct the mistake, if it's incorrigible, you're still young, it's better to admit your mistake to your parents.

You've let them take so much money, it's better for them to call the police.

It's really not worth it, tell the parents about it, it's no problem to call the police, the supermarket has absolutely no power to fine and detain the car, and just ask for money or tell the parents to know about this means, which can constitute the crime of extortion.

The amount of 13 yuan is at most to educate, don't have any worries, know that mistakes can be corrected, and be good, but you can't indulge in crime.

Supermarkets don't have the right to fines and they don't have the right to seize items.

Blatant extortion and illegal detention.

They call it extortion, don't give money. 13 yuan will only be considered petty theft, not a criminal offense, at most the police uncle will teach you a few times. Don't worry about it.

Question 1: It depends on what acts Wang and Zhang have committed, and then it can be determined whether they have committed a crime and what kind of crime they have constituted.

Question 2: Who is Li referring to, I didn't see Ah in the case.

Question 3: Statutory sentencing circumstance 1: Voluntary surrender; 2. Assisting the public security organs in capturing Wang is a meritorious service.

Discretionary sentencing circumstances: 1. First offense, 2. Good attitude.

Question 4: 1. The first interrogation after detention lasted more than 24 hours.

2. The family of the criminal suspect was not notified.

3. PICC and PICC are applicable at the same time.

1. Whether it is an agreement or a contract signed by both parties, as long as it is the true expression of the intention of both parties, it will be legally binding on both parties.

2. The agreement clearly states that the employment relationship between the two parties is one year, during which time, if you take the initiative to terminate the labor relationship in advance, it is okay, but the consequences are:

1. You must notify the employer 30 days in advance, otherwise you will compensate the employer for the loss in accordance with the labor law.

2. Lose the right of the employer to pay a one-time economic compensation based on your working years.

If it is unlawful, in addition to the liquidated damages agreed with the employee in terms of special training and non-competition, the employee who resigns for other reasons only needs to notify the employer 30 days in advance and does not cause losses to the employer.

Labor agreements cannot be used as binding parties. There is only an employment contract. When I graduated, in order to prevent teachers from urging me to find a job every day, I still found an agreement signed by a random employer. Haven't been there once.