Is there a camera similar to the Canon IXUS300hs digital camera?

Yes! Much more.

This kind of card machine is almost all homogeneous, and the price is not bad.

It all depends on what you like about the brand.

Sony is the most popular card machine, with beautiful appearance, rich functions and high cost performance.

For example, the Sony TX9 2000 or so.

Stylish appearance and strong performance! Handheld night scene, panoramic scanning, 3D panoramic scanning, underwater panoramic scanning, backlight correction...

For example, W570, W390, W380 are all about 1500, and 300HS are all in the same grade.

The Sony TX9 is fully automatic, the IXUS300 comes with a partial manual function, the wide-angle end TX9 has a maximum aperture, and the IXUS300 has a maximum aperture.

It's definitely not a grade.

Sony's cost performance is the lowest, any product line is, mobile phones, TVs, computers, Sony's most expensive with the same function, and Sony's configuration at the same price is not as high as other brands.

I bought a notebook last month, and Sony bought more than 6,000 The same configuration of other brands is less than 5,000, such as HP, such as Asus, such as Lenovo, well, I admit that Sony's more than 6,000 is good-looking, but good-looking can't be sold for 1,000 .........Even if it's two or three hundred, I'll put up with ......

ixus300hs is good, and now the price has just been adjusted to less than 2000 yuan, and the cost performance is still very high.

In particular, there are some apertures, which are rare in card machines.

Or don't buy this a3300... I bought it three days ago, and the squeak of the camera's autofocus is very uncomfortable to listen to. Take it to the store and they say that there is no exchange, in short, the attitude is very bad.

Powershot A3300 IS is also some, I suggest you buy a SLR to use.

The SX220HS is recommended

To shoot night scenes, you have to choose a machine equipped with an HS system, so the A3300is is abandoned.

The back has a wide angle, but the SX220 is 14x zoom is more good, 310HS and SX220HS parameters are about the same, but I think, the Canon Boxiu series cameras pay more attention to practicality, strong sense of operation, IXUS is more fashionable, see what you like.

A3300 is still relatively good.

Canon Ixus 300 HS Advantages.

1.The image quality is outstanding, significantly surpassing other IXUS cameras this year, and surpassing other brands of CMOS sensor cameras to varying degrees.

2.The lens has a wide aperture at the wide-angle end, making it good at shooting macro** and close-up close-ups.

3.With the HS system and a large-aperture lens, it has a good shooting effect when the light is low.

4.Outstanding continuous shooting speed, no storage time, no limit on the number of shots (the memory card is fast enough)5The metal body is full of texture, the appearance design is avant-garde and fashionable, and the workmanship is excellent.

7.The performance is stable in daily use, the metering, focusing, and white balance systems are reliable, and the product quality is reliable.

Canon Ixus 300 HS is insufficient.

1.Compared with most flagship fashion cameras of the same grade and price, the screen clarity is low.

3.The lens distortion control ability is weak, and the distortion at the wide-angle end is obvious.

4.The appearance of the fuselage is easy to leave fingerprints, and its own weight is slightly larger.

Filters cannot be manually turned on or off.

The landlord may wish to check out the IXUS 510 HS. Great for home. It's selling very well now.

It's convenient to take pictures when you go out to play. The wide angle is relatively large, and the natural scenery is easier to take into view. The shape is more retro and very distinctive.

The most distinctive thing is wifi, you can connect to other devices anytime and anywhere to upload, don't miss Weibo control or something.

Personally, I feel that 300hs is better.

210 uses a 1-inch 14 million pixel CCD, although the pixels are higher, but the high sensitivity and comprehensive image quality are worse than the same 1-inch 10 million pixel CMOS. Of course, considering only the low ISO, the 210 may be better than 300HS at a certain focal length.

The lens used for the 210 is equivalent to 24-120mm, aperture; The lens used for 300hs is equivalent to 28-105mm, aperture. In general, the larger the zoom ratio, the lower the probability of the lens quality being good, and the 28mm maximum aperture of 300hs is a full stop larger than the 210 at 24mm. Although the 210 has a wider wide-angle end and a longer telephoto section, the overall quality of the lens should still be worse than that of 300hs.

The 300HS HS system is also a selling point, offering a 320 240 pixel (240 frames per second) slow-motion short film mode for better continuous shooting performance. The battery of the two kinds, the battery life of 300hs is also slightly stronger.

I'm also considering which one to buy, I don't know what the market price of 300 is now? I'm more bullish on 300.