-
The GX1 does not have the body stabilization that the EP3 has.
But upstairs said that mirrorless focusing is not good, I really don't agree, regardless of the GX1 and EP3 focusing speed, even faster than many SLRs, as for the Sony NEX focus, the comparison is really bad, the shutter lag is also very good.
If you shoot continuously, these 2 bodies are really not fast, and the GX1 is not much faster than the EP3, and the NEX is really powerful.
If you capture, the main thing is to focus In addition, in order to ensure that the shutter speed is high, the sense is actually more important (the shutter is not enough, even if you have anti-shake, the child will run the same paste), but these 2 cameras are really similar in terms of performance, and the lens is universal.
In addition, the focusing speed has an impact on the body, and the lens is also related to the lens Unfortunately, the 45 focusing speed you like is not fast, of course, it is not very slow, if you want to be fast, you can choose Panasonic's X lens (that X14-42 biscuit is small and practical, of course, you can have another fixed focus) As for the effect, 45 is definitely good, but I think this head is quite long, and the interior may not be able to spread.
In terms of image quality, the EP3 is better for direct color, but the GX1 seems to be better for high sense, but it doesn't need to be too strong for shooting.
EP3 touch screen sensitive point.
I think for you to capture, you can use both cameras, and you can buy whichever you like.
-
The GX1 doesn't seem to have body stabilization, so it needs lens stabilization. It's still Olympus' ep3, which is convenient for transfer in the future.
Capture, focus is important. There is also a shutter lag (refers to the interval between shots that can be shot again after shooting), which is not good for mirrorless, but the new product has improved. Xiang Sony always hyped up his continuous shooting power, which actually made up for this shortcoming of this type of product.
If you want to capture successfully, you need to practice a lot and become familiar with the camera.
-
Children mainly take snapshots, and EP3 is recommended for fast focusing.
-
The comparison between these two can be said to be a sudden victory or defeat, suitable for people with different requirements, so it is difficult to say who must be better than whom. After reading my comparison, you can make your own decision.
First of all, the G3 has a newer look than the EP3, with a thin thickness and strong grip, and is available in a variety of colors. The EP3 has a retro style, which is better for people who have a soft spot for film cameras. Moreover, the G3 has an additional cured viewfinder than the EP3, while the EP3 can only be connected to the viewfinder by the hot shoe (but this also makes the EP3 slightly thicker than the G3, but the overall thickness is a little thinner).
In addition, G3 uses a 460,000-pixel flip-folding touch screen, which is easy to use although the pixels are average. The EP3 uses a fixed touch screen with 10,000 high pixels, which has higher pixels.
From the point of view of parameters, the G3's 15.8 million effective pixels are one level higher than Olympus's 12 million pixels, and the image quality is indeed better than Olympus when the same size. However, Panasonic's straight-out JPG white balance is yellowish, and the Olympus is slightly reddish, so it's best to use the RAW format. In terms of sensitivity, the upper limit of EP3 high sensitivity is 12800 and G3 is 6400, but in actual use, Oba high sensitivity is not better than G3 or even slightly inferior when it is above 3200, so the upper limit can only be a decoration, and it has no practical effect.
However, the EP3 has very powerful on-body digital image stabilization, which the G3 does not have. Although the G3 also has an intelligent sharpness increase that the EP3 does not have, the sharpness is amazing when fully opened, but in actual use, it is not as practical as digital image stabilization, so it can be regarded as a slight loss (mainly because Panasonic has achieved powerful Mega OIS stabilization on the lens). Moreover, the powerful filter function of the EP3 is incomparable to the few filters of the G3.
Therefore, in terms of body function, EP3 has more advantages.
In terms of focus, the EP3 is slightly faster than the G3. However, the difference is not obvious in actual use. The G3's camera capabilities are a bit more advanced than the EP3 (thanks to Panasonic's camera lenses, of course), so it's not much the same in this section.
To sum up, these two machines have their own advantages and strengths. Landlord, you still have to judge according to what you want.
-
If you look at it from the outside, the EP3 is more retro, and the G3 has not many features.
Performance is not much different.
-
E-P3 is good! Sharpness, color is good! The shape is retro, and it is more fashionable on the street!
-
It is recommended that the landlord should not choose mirrorless, first of all, the mirrorless camera screen is particularly slow to focus, and it is impossible to capture quickly; Secondly, the micro mirror is more power-consuming, it is not very convenient to go out to play, in comparison, it is better to have a card machine or a SLR, it is easy to upgrade, the cost performance is also higher, and the market development is more mature. Cards and SLRs like Canon and Nikon are good, and the landlord can consider it
-
I think the Sony NEX-C3 is better, first of all, the sensor size of the APS-C specification, and this is Sony's second single battery, which will be a little more mature.
-
Fancy the picture quality on Sony. Nikon is fast at shooting speed, and pays attention to capturing at any time.
-
The comprehensive strength G3 is the strongest, but the size is slightly larger, J1 is also good, but the bottom is too small, the other two are women's routes, small and easy to use to win.
-
Olympus e-p2
It looks small, looks good, and is retro.
Half-metal, half-plastic, but gives the illusion of "all-metal".
Interchangeable lenses, the lens group is rich.
The LCD can directly display the ** effect, what you see is what you get.
Although EVF is not easy to use, it feels easier to find a DSLR than without, and it is more stable to hold. With the fuselage anti-shake, 17 cake pullover 1 4s handheld film is no problem.
The control is much better in the PEN series digital single battery, mainly because the zoom in and out buttons can be defined as **compensation, so there is a "double dial wheel", which is close to the control feeling of SLR.
The colors of the JPEG are quite flattering, warm and bright, but there is a bit of a film flavor.
The fuselage has image stabilization, which is much more flattering than the Panasonic GF1 and Sony NEX-5.
Filters are interesting.
Olympus PEN E-P3
At present, the flagship of M43, the all-metal retro fuselage, has added a built-in flash, touch-type screen operation, dual-wave wheel design, 35-point focusing, and does not lose the mid-range SLR in terms of operation and focusing ability, compared with the previous generation of machines, the upgraded content is placed inside the fuselage. Powerful M43 lens group support, excellent image quality, many advantages, but ** is a little expensive now.
Merit. There's a lot of it above.,A few more points,Evaluation of metering accuracy,JPGThe color effect is very good,35The focus layout is reasonable,The newly added touch screen shooting is very conducive to capturing,The filter effect is very practical,Although I prefer PS post-plus effect。 The high ISO performance of the small bottom machine is good, and there is no problem with easy film production to 1000.
The hot shoe is very versatile, and the Nikon flash and trigger I use all support it, although there is no TTL.
-
Landlord, you are the same as me! The appearance of the PEN series is too attractive And his colors, filters, and anti-shake EP2 is too old EP3 is too expensive!
The GX1 has a high configuration and fast focusing, but the color is not as good as the Pen, and there is no stabilization. It's cost-effective.
I don't know how to choose...
-
EP2 If you can find a good silver color, you can enter it, and other colors are easy to lose paint.
-
As far as mirrorless is concerned, Nikon's system is the most fragmented and can be ruled out first.
GX1 and EPL3 to compare,GX1The performance and image quality of the body are generally better than EPL3 But the ** you asked about ** is very suspicious,1750It's good to get the fuselage,It's only 1750 with a 1442 lens,It is estimated that the color is relatively poor,You have to be careful when trading。
In terms of lenses, a 1442 zoom and an Olympus 17 can basically cope with most occasions. If you have high requirements for image quality, you can choose Panasonic's "God Cake"-20 fixed focus (both humanities and tourism) or Olympus 45 (bust portrait) according to your shooting preferences.
It is recommended to go around the second-hand trading area of the "Jule Network" (the original "4 3 Network", which should be the most concentrated Chinese ** of O Ji and Panasonic 4 3 system users) with more O fans, comparing ** and color, where the old ID mixed forum has been relatively long, the character is relatively *** in all aspects, and there are many transactions ***. **You can also consider it, you can find a store called "Dongdong Liangbao", which is an old shop that has been making Olympus and Panasonic 4 3 system products for many years, and many old O fans are "smuggling drugs" from him, hehe
-
Personally recommend v1 because it is extremely cost-effective.
If you don't care about these 2 points, you can consider Nikon V1
-
The first thing to rule out is Nikon, Nikon's SLR is not the same as mirrorless. The mirrorless field is still the world of Panasonic, Oba and Sony.
Choose between Panasonic GX1 and Oba EPL3, Panasonic GX1 is recommended, especially the electric zoom lens, with GX1 similar to the shape of the side axis on the appearance is absolutely stylish, at the same time, GX1 is known as Guanxi No. 1, the quality of photography is also very good, the focus is accurate, stable and fast.
Let me give you the answer
The GF3 is a model developed by Panasonic to reduce the size of the fuselage. The body is very thin and compact, and the functions are as family-oriented as possible, touch focusing, and it is very simple to use. >>>More
If you're upgrading. Just 5200. Because the 6600 and 5200 are not much different in performance. That's just a 1 second or a few nanoseconds. After all, the AGP limit problem. It is no longer possible to improve the quality and speed of the display. >>>More
For users who don't know what they want to shoot, the only advantage and disadvantage is probably in the quality of the product. >>>More
Hello, the main difference between the iPad wifi version and the 3G version is: >>>More
Personally, I prefer Meizu MX3,It's not me black m,The key is that small m is to put it bluntly, a burst of households bought a lot of high-end assembly of the "god machine",Technology products rely on core technology,It's not your so-called high running score,No matter how unstable the running score is, it doesn't make much sense for you to buy it,After a while, there will be problems,Small M is just more good at advertising,After using it, you will find a lot of unstable problems (for example, the last time I grabbed the M2 on the official website of small m,It's pretty cool to play just now, But after a month, problems began to occur, the mobile phone signal is unstable, it will crash and the black screen, and many netizens have had similar problems, this is my personal experience), the technology of Meizu, a senior mobile phone manufacturer, is relatively stable, and the most important thing is that the configuration of the two is almost the same, the above is purely a personal opinion, and the final choice is yours. >>>More