Which D7000 60D to choose! Now the price difference is about 500! It s more tangled! Ask for prawns

I'll give you another answer I'm going to give you again, I hope it helps.

I struggled with these two and finally chose the D7000.

First of all, the whole body of the 60d is plastic, and the parts you can touch in the 7000 are basically metal. The feel will be better, of course, some people say that the overall feeling of the 60d in the hand is better than that of the 7000. Let's go to the store and feel this for yourself.

Secondly, the 39-point focus of the 7000 is very good, and there is also a high sensitivity, workmanship and the like are better than 60D

As for imaging, the 7000 is definitely not covered for the shooting of the scenery, and the overall feeling is better than that of the 60d. In terms of portraits, I feel inferior to the Canon. Also, I don't really like the overall gray feeling of the Canon home.

If you say that a few months ago, 7000 because of the flood ** high, you can tangle it, the current 7000 price set of early 8000, ** is very good, it is a good time to shoot. It is estimated that there is not much room for price reduction.

In addition, you said, you only plan to buy a set of cameras, Canon 18-135 lenses, it's really not good, and the reputation is not very good. And Nikon's pullover 18-105, you should have heard the saying that Nikon dog head is not a dog, can meet your usual requirements.

So, in the end, I recommend the D7000 to you.

A certain treasure** can be used as a reference, or recommend you to go to a certain east, a certain Ning, a certain beauty, a certain news, a certain Ma Xun and other places to buy, at present, these e-commerce ** battles are being fought, seize the opportunity of their melee! The water of a certain treasure is still relatively deep, and the cheap one is not steady!

Only buy a set of D7000 Ah, unless you have a red circle around you to rub.

**It's hard to say, maybe it will fall a little bit, but I feel that unless it comes out of D400 or something, it won't drop a lot, buy it early, enjoy it early.

I just bought it hehey it was just a long time ago.

D7000 is the only choice **There should still be a certain amount of space, but the overall space is not large, and it is estimated that there is a space of 200 300 in half a year.

DSLR words. The lowest-end set** is around 3000-4000, and the most commonly used body is about 6000-8000, such as Canon 7D 60D and similar. I use the Canon 60D at home, and it's very comfortable to hold.

Decisive D7000

60d is more entertaining and traveling.

The D7000 is more suitable for more professional photographers.

Excuse me, upstairs, what does the D7000 compare with the 7D?

There is really no standard answer to this kind of question of the landlord, 100 people will give you 100 answers, it really makes no sense, and for this kind of question, I personally think that what suits you is the best.

D7000 as a popular camera closer to the professional machine, it is indeed praised, but the price is too high (at present), the focus is 39 is not 51, not an all-metal shell, etc., which is more alienated from the masses, and the landlord thinks about it himself.

In the case of 50D, the first is the sturdy body and easy-to-operate design. The second is the comfortable feel and atmospheric appearance. The third is that the phase elements are sufficient and easy to cut.

The imaging feature of the Canon DSLR is that the color is true without any modification. Shadow detail is good, and noise suppression is at a high level in its class.

7D, let's start with pixels, the high resolution brought by 18 million pixels is used for landscape and sports shooting, which best reflects the power of Canon's high-pixel sensor. The other is 19-point autofocus; The convenience of the 100-degree field of view and the fast and precise focusing of fixed-point focus are enough to reflect the quasi-professional level of 7D. Secondly, the flexibility of the speed control screen is self-evident.

In the end, the hard and crisp shutter sound is intoxicating, and I use 7D myself, so if the landlord is not bad for money, he will go to 7D.

50D is delisted, D7000 is too expensive, 7D is more cost-effective, D300S can also be considered

D7000 is good, definitely. This is a machine that Nikon has been holding back for three years to launch in order to restrain Canon's 50D and 7D products. If it's not too expensive, you can't go wrong with it!

If you don't have a lens burden, you can choose the D7000, and both Canon and Nikon have their own characteristics. If money isn't an issue, the more expensive the performance. It depends on how much you want to spend.

50d oldest. It is a discontinued product, and D7000 is the latest. Not long after it was listed.

60d is between d90 and d7000.

As for the comparison of various functions, each has its own preferences, if you haven't even thought about whether to enter the C home or the N family, I think you have to think carefully about buying.

Canon starts with 60D, yes, you did the right thing in the first step, but what head do you use? You know, Canon's 18-end head, none of them are decent, much worse than Nikon's 18-end head, I mean overall, don't separate the focal length to compare, which is why the home entry-level, Nikon users are far more than Canon, you can't stand up to other Nikon's 18 sets of heads. Nikon's 18-55 is a very good sleeve, and the optical quality is even better than its own 18-105 in segmentation, and the distortion is excellent.

And look at Canon, the most common one now is 18-135, my God, what kind of head is this, I don't know if I think it was OEM in a workshop in Shenzhen, China. It's amazing that when you hang it on your chest, the barrel slides down automatically to breathe. If you can't get damping, why doesn't Canon install a lockout switch?

I'm sorry, but the low end is not pretended, and that's what Canon thinks.

Therefore, the Canon head can only be considered from the red circle, do not look at the focal length of 17-40 at least, consider more points 24-105 is necessary. Otherwise, this money is really unjustly spent. However, at the beginning of 24, after multiplying the coefficient in the APS-C format, the focal length is not practical.

And Nikon is a good choice, the mid-range fuselage D90 with 16-85, enough to make a picture, ** only seven or eight thousand, or with 18-105 sleeve, only more than 6000, enough.

1. The Nikon D7000 is expensive, and the Canon 60D is cheaper.

2. The Canon 60D camera is powerful, and the Nikon D7000 camera function is not as good as the 60D.

3. The Nikon D7000 has a 39-point focus point, while the Canon 60D has only 9.

4. The Nikon D7000 is a 100% viewfinder, the Canon is not.

5. Canon has an engineering plastic body, and Nikon has a semi-plastic and semi-metal body.

6. Canon has a flip screen, Nikon is not, and Canon's display has higher pixels than Nikon.

7. Canon has more than 18 million pixels to take pictures, which is slightly inferior to Nikon.

8. Nikon supports dual memory cards, while Canon has only one.

In short, there are pros and cons to each, Nikon is better at taking pictures, Canon is better at taking pictures, and there is not much difference between the two.

It has been hovering between D7000 and 60D before, because D7000 has increased a lot of price and cost performance, and finally chose 60D, which is more cost-effective. For a newbie like me, overly specialized features may not be useful. The one who buys the best one for you is the best.

It can only be said that each has its own strengths, you can look at the corresponding forum, and it depends on the purpose of the camera you buy, which is also very important!

The purchase reference order is D d, D5200.

The D7000 has the best overall performance, there is nothing to say, the performance is there.

The 700D is in the front, on the one hand, it is new, and on the other hand, Canon lenses have motors, and there is no problem of not being able to autofocus after buying, which will be more worry-free when buying a lens. The cost of an entry-level prime lens is also slightly lower.

The D5200 is not worse than the 700D, and it is cost-effective. However, there is no motor in the fuselage, so when you buy an entry-level prime lens, you have to buy a G-head, and the D-head cannot autofocus, and the G-head ** is slightly more expensive, and the cost of entry-level prime is slightly higher. But if you will buy a better lens in the future, you don't have to think about it.

Three machines are preferred to buy D7000 according to the strongest (in fact, it is better to add D7100). The remaining 700D and D5200 can be purchased from your favorite brand. It's all pretty much the same.

It's better to say that it's better to buy 700D or D5200, and it's more appropriate to start with the beginning. FYI.

D7000 mid-range machine, it's right to choose him. The features are absolutely sufficient, and you won't have a problem using it for 3-5 years.

If you are a beginner, it is recommended to buy D5200 to buy, its focusing speed is as fast as D800, as for D7000, this is a SLR, not a mobile phone, the mobile phone will be outdated after a year or two, but the SLR is different, and it is still a mid-range flagship after a year or two.

The 700D is for you, and it's also suitable.

60d is recommended.

First of all, d90 passes off a bit old.

600D standard entry-level model Home level consumer SLR camera looks like the landlord should want to play with photography Therefore, it is recommended that 60D60D belongs to the mid-range SLR camera It can also be called a quasi-professional SLR, from the functional point of view, compared with 600D, it is more professional, and if you start 60D, if you are not in a hurry to pursue full frame, you can use it for a few years.

And 600d is the entry machine, when the landlord is familiar with the SLR, he will feel that 600d is really not easy to use, hehe.

In fact, the landlord should pay more attention to research what lens is more suitable for himself.

I've played with vintage 135 cameras in the past, and I have a little experience, and if I want to equip it in one step, it's perfectly fine to play Canon 60D. The Canon 600D is best for beginners (the recently new 650D has one more display touch function than the 600D), and the 60D and 600D are both 18 million pixels, and the effect can be comparable. But the 60d has a shoulder screen; 600D does not have, 60D adopts 9-point full cross, ** double cross focusing system; 600d is only the first point of the cross, 60d is framed with a wide and bright glass pentaprism; 600d is framed with only five mirror reflections; 60D with continuous shooting performance; 600d only; 60D has a more powerful and reliable power system; The 600D battery has a small capacity and a weak battery life; The 60D is designed with a more durable and comfortable mid-sized body; The 600D has a compact, small body design.

The Nikon D90 is priced in the middle of the previous two cameras, with a slightly lower pixel of 12 million, which doesn't feel as good as the Canon.

At the same price, the Canon camera is better, and the lens is Nikon's.

How to shoot in the later stage completely depends on the lens, many people have thousands of cameras, but the lenses are more than 10,000, if you are not a rich boss, or rely on photography to eat, don't think about it.

Let's weigh up the specifics.

I've been using the d90 and it feels pretty good.