Pentax K X, Nikon D90, who is the best camera for portraits?

Canon is the most suitable for portraits, Canon imaging is soft, the color is light, especially when shooting mm** it looks very fine white, Nikon is suitable for documentary photography, the color is heavy, for example, the effect of Shaanxi uncle and aunt is better, Pentax is suitable for landscapes and portraits, the color is very distinctive, very bright, very good-looking, it is the embodiment of Pentax's perfect lens, if you shoot people, buy Canon, 500d. Or 550D, this is very good, with 7D CMOS, noise reduction image quality is better than the current half-frame camera. You can't go wrong with Canon for anything, KX is very cost-effective, and it's also very good, D90 is more expensive, and it's a plastic body, and there is only one cross focus point out of 11 focus points, which is relatively cost-effective.

All right... D90 is recommended all in one place.。。。 I wonder if the three people above have used Nikon...

The most important thing about portraits is that the skin tone is real, and the texture is soft and smooth, which is why the portrait focal length is a medium telephoto, because the medium and normal focal length itself has a soft focus effect... And Nikon's imaging,It's all sharp,The soft focus effect is gone.,The above three recommend Nikon.,Give a reason?。。

This should be about what lens is suitable for portraits, not what machines.

The difference in imaging style is far less than the difference in lens focal length and aperture, as well as the performance of the lens.

So, I think the starting point is still on the lens group. Choose the D90, it's easier to match the lens.

50 85 is fine.

Pentax ... There's a bunch of old men to play with... Cool... And the body is anti-shake. It's true. I also prefer some of Pentax's colors. Rich and oily. Ha ha.

The KX only has an advantage over the D90 in 2 aspects.

1. Color Skin tone restoration is very good.

2. High sensitivity is good The quality of the model is good at night.

Conclusion 1 Source.

Conclusion 2 Source.

In the long run, the Nikon D90 is still a good deal.

The d90+85 portrait is good. Or if you're strapped for money, get a header

In fact, the color and sharpness of the DSLR can be adjusted in post-production, which is also the biggest advantage of digital over film, so the difference between direct film is not very important. In terms of color, Pentax is the most gorgeous, followed by Nikon, Canon is very light, and Nikon is the sharpest in sharpness, but this has a lot to do with the lens, and the difference in the body can also be ignored.

Among the several machines you mentioned, the K7 is stronger than the 60D in terms of performance, followed by the 50D, and finally the D90, but the D90 is the cheapest, and the performance is not much different, it is actually the most cost-effective and most worthwhile model. The problem with the K7 is that the pullover is not enough, but if you have played with film, you should not start with the pullover, and I am not familiar with Pentax lenses, so I don't know how to choose. 60D is the latest, but it is a plastic body, compared to 50D, it just has more camera functions and flip screen, the pixel is 3 million high, ** very high, it is not worth buying, 50D is relatively mediocre in comparison, there are no obvious advantages and disadvantages.

Personally, I recommend the D90 or 50D, you can look at your previous equipment, D90 with body motor, Nikon Film SLR D-type AF Nikkor can still autofocus and metering, AI lens can also focus manually and spot metering.

60d is better. The new D7000 Nikon is also good, both are entry-level mid-range. The D90 is older but not inferior to the 50D, and the D90 has more jog joint testing functions than the 50D, but there is no focus fine-tuning. Buy the 550d. More than 5000 thank you for adopting.

People who say that Pentax lens resources are small. It seems that all the players at the rich level. 16-50 50-135 60-250 200 300 600 Not enough for you to play 31 43 21 40 70 77 14 15 35 55 100 50 to play?

If you play it all. It's better to go straight to Hasselblad...

As far as your requirements are concerned, I think Nikon's D90 is more in line.

The D5100 is more practical for short films.

The Nikon D90 is not very good for short films, I often use it to take pictures, and the quality of the video is too poor.

I feel very good when I use the D90, the image quality is sharp and easy to produce results, suitable for novices, and the performance of the camera is very stable, the handheld part and the operation area are very human-machine, and it will feel comfortable to use.

Pentax heard that it is a professional camera, but the disadvantage is that the lens of the camera is relatively small, ** lower than Nikon's can be lower (lens), but Nikon's you can use the head of the auxiliary factory, such as Tamlong, Sigma, Tokina, etc. Pentax can also be used, but it is relatively rare, if it is a novice without a foundation, I recommend you to use D90

I definitely chose Nikon, Nikon's lenses are easy to buy, and there are many service outlets than Bin.

D90D7000: is an upgrade of the D90 and is still a mid-range D300 D300S: is the flagship level of DX format The D700 and D3X are full-frame.

The D90 is considered the best machine in the mid-range, and at the next level, it is upgraded to the flagship D300 D300S high-end full D700

Professional D3X D3S

Now the mid-range has a D7000 with a delicate image quality bias towards Canon, and the 2nd generation chip D800 is not clear whether it is on the market.

There are only D7000 and D300, ** It's about the same, I personally like D300 more.

d300 or d700, but it's not necessary, 90 is okay except for the occasional out-of-focus.

1. I use Pentax KR, and I have also used Pentax's APS flagship - K5, just in terms of the fuselage, K5 has nothing to say, worthy of the title of flagship! Many reviews say that it has the best tolerance, and the overall score seems to be the best among all apsc frames, not one of them! The D90 is also a good machine, but in terms of the body alone, the K5 wins!

2. It is not recommended to buy 18-105 This so-called one-lens goes all over the world, the lens with a focal length of more than 5 times is generally not very good, if you buy Pentax, 18--55wr This head is a must, and the Pentax sleeve itself is very kind, plus waterproof, invincible, why not.

3, Pentax's fixed focus is more interesting, presumably you have also done a lot of homework, the three princesses needless to say,**a little expensive, let's talk about the more reliable three biscuits,**are below 3000,small,The picture quality is also good,It should meet your requirements,If you want to go further, there are Pentax's star mirrors such as star 55,Better,But**It is also higher,To sum up, it is recommended to buy K5 18-55WR set + fixed focus,Fixed focus depends on what focal length you like,Biscuits have 21 40 70 three focal lengths,** All around 2700.

4. Pay attention to color, I don't need to say more, everyone knows that --- Pentax color is intoxicating.

5. As for the slow focusing of Pentax upstairs, I have used a friend's D90, and I can't see the gap between K5 and K5 under normal light, if K5 is paired with a biscuit head, the focus is just right.

If you don't consider after-sales and maintenance factors, it is recommended to pose for K5 and capture more D90.

If you consider after-sales and maintenance, you still buy C N, of course, it is very reassuring to be easy to maintain.

Regarding the choice of lens, my suggestion is that the landlord chooses the focal length according to his own needs, and does not need to think much about the fixed focus if the investment is not large.

The color effects are actually similar, novices should practice using light and composition more, and then learn to adjust later**.

The fuselage control is K5 is better than D90, the picture is simple and easy to control, and the professional performance depends on DXO's professional evaluation, to put it simply, in the camera test of all specifications: Pentax K5 82 points ranked sixth, first in C frame, Nikon D90 73 points, 22nd. The evaluation mainly measures the image quality of the camera in terms of color depth, dynamic range and low-light ISO.

I always think that the equipment is far less important than the photographer's thoughts, a group of 5D works on the street are not necessarily high to **, the key is to use their own ideas to give the theme and soul of the work, now the SLR is no longer a film machine, no need to save the shutter, just shoot more and practice, the more you learn, the more you learn the machine, the more you can convert it into the owner's own photographic style and technology. Of course, the master is not a casual knife, a move must have a harvest, which still requires the landlord to have his own understanding of the definition of the work and photography.

To put it bluntly, it is to watch more, practice more, and think more.

Friends, don't get into 18-55

The 18-105 focal length is much easier to use than the 18-55!

As for color, it shouldn't be the focus of consideration. Because in post-production, you can achieve your favorite colors with simple adjustments! Don't despise the post-production Oh, it's like a woman who has to wear makeup when she goes out, it's a must.

All the ** I shoot can only be "released" after post-adjustment.

Therefore, let's think more about other aspects! It is recommended to go to Nikon.

The K5 is good, but after-sales is a problem. Pentax body stabilization, you can buy a lens without stabilization, which is very cheap.

Pentax's software is a bit worse, and the D90 has proven itself to be a very reliable machine over the years, with a wealth of professional features.

The difference between 18-55 and 18-105 is not noticeable in imaging except for the difference in focal length.

The 18-105 color is a little dry, but it also shines in good light, especially the 105 portrait effect is not comparable to the 18-55.

Both Nikon and Canon have large lens clusters to support it, and Pentax is slightly worse.

Pentax is a waterproof design, and I don't know much about other aspects, after all, there are not many people who use it.

The D90 is now extremely cost-effective, and it is backed by a large lens group, so I personally recommend the D90

The K5 autofocus is slow, and it can't compare with the NC family. Re-entry fixed focus telephoto plus its own pullover is very troublesome to go out, it is better not to change the pullover to 18-200, Nikon's is more expensive, and Sigma's is more cost-effective. Therefore, it is recommended that you buy D90 + Sigma 18-200 + 50 Ding.