How does SCI conduct review?

The review method is as follows:

1.Get the picture straight: look at the title, abstract, the last paragraph or two of the introduction, and the conclusion. Simple search and contact based on keywords, clarify the general direction of the author's content, what problems are solved, and what are the core innovation points.

2.Look at the approximate effect: Quickly browse the experimental verification section, mainly focusing on the illustrations, ** and the core conclusions below them, to determine whether they are related to the questions raised, the research content, and whether the conclusions positively support the core contribution points of the article.

3.Preliminary filing: If the problem solved is real and valuable, and the effect verification link can fully show that the proposed method solves the problem, then the article is basically valid.

If this condition is not met, the manuscript will be reviewed with a tricky attitude, and many objective details will be found in the article, or the problem of topic selection and contribution of the article will be directly and subjectively pointed out, and the first instance will give a negative evaluation, which will be rejected by the editorial and banking committee.

4.Perusal: On this basis, if there are no obvious contradictions or errors within the method, and the experimental design is reasonable and sufficient, then this article is established (congratulations, I would recommend recording the noise directly).

Instead, I will pick out some key details that are clearly worth improving, and ask the author to revise them further, but I will not give too negative comments. Generally, the editorial board notifies major and minor revisions.

After you write your own article, you go to some journals of SCI by yourself, you usually have to pay attention to the information and content of these journals, choose a journal that suits the direction of your article, and then the difficulty level is within your reach.

In the second half of 2020, the Chinese Academy of Sciences gave an early warning list of SCI journals, and after the list was announced, major universities also included these journals in the blacklist of SCI journals in their universities.

According to the analysis of many experts in "Modeling Lion", the current SCI journals with "fast review and quality and water" are recommended to take a look at MDPI's own, but friendly reminder: Shiyou failed last year Many MDPI's SCI journals were listed as early warning journals, in addition, MDPI's SCI and EI journals have a significant feature that the preliminary review pass rate is extremely low, especially the manuscripts of Chinese authors.

1. Slow review of non-early warnings.

Among the non-early warning SCI journals, there are very few fast reviewers, and it generally takes 3 to 6 months to get the first-instance revision opinions for self-submission, and it is very normal for the manuscript to be accepted for 6 to 9 months. We have been in contact with a lot of experts, and the article is very well written, but we have not received feedback after more than half a year.

2. Recommend publication review quickly.

The review of manuscripts recommended by experts to special issues will be faster, because the reviewers of special issues are experts known to the editor-in-chief, and the editor-in-chief can ask them to speed up the review process.

3. There are requirements for the quality of the manuscript.

However, whether you submit your manuscript yourself or entrust an expert to recommend it to a special issue, the quality of the manuscript is required, and a manuscript that is too poor will definitely not work.

At present, the SCI journal search and review process is very strict, and each manuscript must go through the following processes in the submission system: preliminary review, the first peer review, author revision, multiple peer review and multiple revisions, publishing house QA quality control, editor-in-chief final decision, proof, publication, WOS database inclusion. Taishui's manuscript is recommended to be transferred to the EI conference.

4. The direction of SCI receipt is narrow.

Different from Chinese core journals, most SCI journals receive papers in a very narrow direction, and many manuscripts are difficult to pass even the initial review, let alone external review and acceptance. The specific journal to apply for needs to be matched according to your research direction, impact factor requirements, Chinese Academy of Sciences zoning requirements, acceptance time requirements, and retrieval time requirements.

to journal

When the article is uploaded, the displayed status is submitted to journal, which is naturally occurring and does not need to be processed.

Editor: If you are not asked to choose your manuscript when you submit it, you will go to the editor-in-chief first, and the editor-in-chief will assign it to the associate editor-in-chief or others. There are two other states that will appear:

1) Awaiting Editor Assignment: Assign responsibility. (Note: Editor Assigned assigns your article to a single process.) ）

3.with editor: Two possible states after a submittal (Decision Letter Being Prepared or Reviewers Invited):

Tip 1: Decision letter being prepared means that you decide by yourself without looking for a reviewer, which is generally tragic. First, it may be that the English is too poor and needs language sci polishing.

Second, it may be that the content is too poor.

Tip 2: reviewer(s) invited means that the reviewer has been found and the review starts.

4.Under review: This process is a long wait for review.

to journal (Submission.)

Received by Editorial Office (Submission successful).

editor (submitted to the editor-in-chief).

4.under review

5.required reviews completed (indicates that the review comments have been returned to.

6.Evaluating recommendation (This means that the reviewer's opinion is being evaluated, and the author receives the suggestion.)

7.Decision in Process

8.minor revision major revision

9. revision submitted to journal

Return to the section after modification).

10. accepted

Rejection).

If you don't ask for a selection at the time of submission, go to the editor-in-chief first, and the editor-in-chief will assign you to someone else. There will be two other states:

1) Editor Assigned. 2) Editor Declined Invitation. At this point, the editor-in-chief has to reassign the submitted article to another person.

Generally speaking, if you submit, you may not be able to succeed at one time, maybe you will be beaten back once you submit, and it will not be successful, so you need to make revisions again, it is recommended that you can consult your supervisor more when submitting your manuscript to see if it can give you some targeted advice.

What are the states of SCI submissions?

Understanding what kind of existence people are is the key to solving all problems. However, even so, the appearance of man still represents a certain significance.

Whether it is generous to sprinkle the way the hair doctor sa sa intent.

1.Select a journal.

2.Submit your manuscript as requested.

3.Write a cover letter

4.Revise. 5.Publication.