Military power, let s say China and the United States VS Japan and Russia, who can win? 5

The question is how long Japan can withstand the United States, if Japan keeps the Americans in the Pacific Ocean for a relatively long time, China will be driven into the mountains by Russia, but in the end, the joint attack of Japan and Russia will lose the United States, the US Navy will keep Japan and Russia at home, and several aircraft carrier battle groups will easily land on Japan and Russia, but the battle after landing will be very difficult.

The Chinese army is strong, but the Russian army is a camel bigger than a horse, and a large number of Russian armored forces in the early stage will pose a threat to China. The data on these equipment is best known to the Russians, so the land war between China and Russia is the most difficult to fight.

China has the world's leading superconducting maglev general combat vehicle, which can fly underwater, on the surface, in the air, above and below the ground, **powerful, indefensible, and a superconducting magnet that abolishes the US nuclear **, it can also attract American satellites and bring it back to China, the United States' space advantage no longer exists, so China and Russia can defeat the United States and Japan, China's Qianlong missile carries a current of four billion volts enough to detonate Japan's missile depot, gunpowder depot, explosives depot, fuel depot and power station, and one warhead is enough to destroy all Japanese military forces.

Without China and the United States joining forces, as long as the Chinese can use the advanced ** of the Yankees, they can defeat any country!

China and the United States vs Japan and Russia, China and the United States win, and if they use nuclear weapons, the world will be destroyed n times.

With conventional **, China and the United States can win.

With nuclear weapons, there are no winners.

China and the United States are invincible in the world.

I think the United States will be the winner in the end.

In the context of such a complex international situation, the United Nations has also issued a warning to the international community, and the two countries that influence the international situation are none other than the United States and Russia. Because of the game between the two countries, the international situation has reached such a complicated point.

Although US hegemonism has aroused the disgust of countless countries, because the United States still has strong economic and military strength, the United States can take advantage of all its advantages in the game with Russia. As long as the United States and Russia do not choose to solve the problem by means of war, the United States will be the final winner in this game. <>

In the game between the United States and Russia, although the United States and Russia have adopted the means of mutual sanctions, because the United States is far more powerful than Russia, and the United States dominates the European and American markets, even if Russia imposes sanctions on the United States, it will not have any impact on the United States. However, the US sanctions against Russia will deal a fatal blow to Russia, and it is for this reason that the United States will become the ultimate winner. <>

Although the United States is secretly importing Russian energy resources, the main reason why the United States is doing so is to export these resources to Europe. You must know that the United States itself is an energy-rich country, which makes it possible for Russia to threaten European countries with energy means, but will not let the United States be affected in the slightest, but will make the United States gain more because of Russia's sanctions. <>

It is precisely because the United States has an advantage over Russia in every aspect that Russia will eventually become the loser, while the United States will become the final winner, and although Russia will take some means to counterattack the United States, these counterattack means will not bring fatal harm to the United States.

First of all, Japan and China are highly interdependent and will not go to war.

Secondly, island countries do not have strategic depth, but island countries can also be powerful through sea power, and Britain is a typical example.

Words can't be said to be too dead, how Japan invaded China in World War II, the past does not forget the future.

War is actually a game of industrial capacity and economic strength, which is a game of burning money.

Japan is too small and relies too much on strategic resources. It is possible to become an economic power through peace, but it is impossible to become a military power with the limitation of resources. Resources simply cannot withstand consumption, and industry is too dense to withstand hostile attacks.

This time it was just a tsunami**, and half of Japan's industry was stumbled, and its ability to resist blows was too poor.

The great country has a huge strategic depth, which means that there are several sets of independent and scattered industrial systems (for example, China's third line, that is, to copy the entire set of industrial systems and hide them in remote areas), even under the devastating blows of the enemy, they can still maintain complete sets of industrial production capacity and insist on fighting with you. If the country is small, it will not work, and several key industrial zones will be destroyed, and the industrial chain will be broken, and the game will basically be over.

Comparison of the strength of the Chinese and Japanese air forces.

Three generations of heavy fighters:

China: Su-27, Su-30, J11, J11B series 355, Japan: F15C, D series, 200 aircraft.

III generation light fighter:

China: 230 J10 series.

Japan: 82 units of the F2 family.

Fighter-bomber:

China: 150 aircraft of the FBC-1 Flying Leopard series.

Japan: 0.

AWACS aircraft: China: 4 large early warning aircraft (Air Police 2000), 10 medium early warning aircraft (Air Police 200), 4-5 quasi-early warning aircraft (Yun-8 warning aircraft), a total of 19 aircraft.

Japan: 4 large AWACS aircraft (E-767); 13 light AWACS aircraft (E-2 type), a total of 17 aircraft.

Bomber. China: More than 10 medium-sized bombers (H-6K) capable of launching cruise missiles.

Japan: 0.

Comparison of the Chinese and Japanese navies.

Large destroyers (over 7000 tons):

China: 2 ships of the 052C class, 4 ships of the Hyundai class, 2 ships of the 051C class, a total of 8 ships.

Japan: 2 ships in Atago, 4 ships in Kongo, a total of 6 ships.

Multipurpose destroyers, anti-submarine destroyers, large frigates (over 4500 tons):

China: 2 ships of the 052B class, 1 ship of the 051B class, 2 ships of the 052 series, 18 ships of the Jiangkai class, a total of 23 ships.

Japan: 2 ships of the Flag Wind class, 5 ships of the Takanami class, and 9 ships of the Amamura class, a total of 16 ships.

Multipurpose destroyers, frigates (2000-3500 tons):

China: 10 ships of the Jiangwei II class.

Japan: 8 ships of the Asagiri class.

Conventionally powered submarines (advanced):

China: 7 ships of the Yuan class series, 12 ships of the Kilo class, a total of 19 ships.

Japan: 3 Soryu-class, 11 Qinchao-class, and 2 Chunchao-class, a total of 16 ships.

Nuclear submarines: China: at least 10 already in service.

Japan: 0 ships.

Amphibious landing ships:

China: 3 ships of the 071 class, 20,000 tons.

Japan: 3 Osumi class ships. 8000 tons.

Aircraft carriers:

Japan: 2 ships of the Hyuga class.

China: 0, rumored to be under construction of the 081-class *** aircraft carrier....

Aircraft carriers: China: 1 unit.

Japan: 0 ships.

Relatively backward destroyers, frigates, submarines:

China: 13 destroyers of the 051 class.

China: Jianghu-class frigates and 32 others.

China: 13 Song-class submarines and 15 Ming-class submarines, a total of 28 submarines.

If the ZF and the army are tough enough, China has a seventy percent chance of winning.

Japan didn't build it, do you think he doesn't have a nuclear bomb? He is afraid of a wool, the fish dies and the net is broken, the Japanese can do it, the Chinese may not dare it! Remember Scarborough Shoal? All committed suicide and martyrdom, and China cultivated traitors very well.

Comparing the military strength of China and Japan, China won steadily. In the past, Japan's navy and air force were ahead of China in an all-round way, but in the past 10 years or so, China has been catching up, and now Japan only has the advantage in the number and tonnage of the navy, and our underwater, air, and ballistic missiles have the advantage.

Japan is a country that faces the sea in an all-round way, and its naval strength can be said to be one of the best in the world, and China can only get its hands on missiles, of course, once a war breaks out, no one can tell who will win, and besides, Japan and the United States have a treaty, and if the United States intervenes, it will be difficult to say whether this will win or lose.

Kill 1,000 enemies and lose 800 yourself.

China may lose a local conflict, but China will win a full-scale war.

China and the United States are winning.

Economy, technology, and manpower are ahead of Japan and Russia.

But China is in a more difficult situation, after all, it is surrounded by Japan and Russia.

Therefore, as soon as it comes up, the United States first has to transport its delivery capacity to China, that is, it first pulls its large transport planes over.

Then an economic blockade will be imposed, and Japan's mobilizable economic resources will be swept away first.

Then China and the United States used nuclear deterrence at the same time, and China began to actively mobilize defenses, waiting for American reinforcements to arrive and counterattack.

Of course, this is just a formality.

In fact, Japan and Russia have very weak offensive capabilities in the face of countries like China and the United States.

The current Russia is playing well with Rugia and Ukraine. The odds of winning against China are not at all great.

In Japan, it's even more out of order. What technology is leading and the spirit of craftsmanship is purely blown out.

In the past few years, Japan has done a lot of messy and counterfeiting. The earth-shattering sound of hitting yourself in the face.

There is no chance of winning.

In fact, there will never be a winner, China, the United States, and Russia all possess nuclear weapons, and forcing them to a dead end will inevitably lead to a nuclear war, while the United States and Russia have thousands of nuclear weapons, most of which are 100 or 1,000 times more powerful than the Hiroshima atomic bomb! The power of the nuclear explosion is huge, but the subsequent radioactive contamination will last for thousands of years, enough to destroy human civilization several times, which means that in a nuclear war, either side will be the loser.

Zero, the United States will destroy the planet.

There is a good chance that it will destroy the planet.

If you don't talk about nuclear **, only conventional**, it is still Japan, China and Russia that win, and the United States will not be able to bear it, if Japan, China or Japan and Russia are still difficult to win, but the three countries will definitely win if they join forces.

There is no need to assume that it will not happen at all, and it is still possible to unite to attack China.