What should I do if the husband and wife voluntarily divorce and the woman wants to see the children

The husband and wife divorced voluntarily and the woman wanted to see the child. Then you can go and see ah, they can't put the child won't let them take the documents? Because it's like an analogy, well, the child was awarded to her husband, but the woman can also go to see it if she wants to see it, and there is no explicit rule that the woman can't.

Green can also be expensive, and the law doesn't stipulate it, well, the woman can't go to see the sea. If the man doesn't agree, you sue them. High-grade winding.

Good judges, they agree that you go to see the sea.

You can see it, you can see it at any time without affecting the child's life, this is the law, even if she is divorced, it is her child, and she can't be deprived of the right to visit.

Hello, after the divorce of the husband and wife, both parties have the right to visit the children, which has mandatory legal effect. Even if the parents divorce, the father or mother still has the responsibility and obligation to support the child, and the child also has the right to meet the parents. This not only avoids disputes between divorced couples, but also benefits the physical and mental health of the children.

Therefore, the right of parents to visit their children is protected by law.

First of all, you must provide the divorce agreement (confirmed by the seal of the Civil Affairs Bureau) or the divorce judgment, divorce mediation letter, household registration book, ID card (for the woman), go to the local police station where you want to move in to issue a letter to receive the moving household registration, and then go to the police station where the current household registration is located to handle the transfer of household registration, and finally go to the local police station to confirm the household registration.

In this case, it depends on whether you can agree to change the custody of the child, and if you cannot negotiate the change, you can only sue to change the custody of the child.

In a lawsuit, the man is not able to raise him, so he will give it to the woman.

The law depends on who has the financial means to decide who goes to whom.

Your plight is sympathetic.

1. Because the child is relatively small, the law considers it more appropriate to follow the mother, and it is reasonable for you to ask to raise the child. Guess the dust.

2. The things that accompany the marriage belong to the joint property of the husband and wife, and half of the joint property of the husband and wife can be divided according to the requirements when suing for divorce, including houses, deposits, etc.

3. Both husband and wife have the obligation to raise their children, and there is no legal basis for your husband to ask not to pay child support.

4. In addition to the division of the joint property of the husband and wife, you can also request the payment of the living expenses of the children until the age of 18.

You can go to the court to complain, this is the right of mothers, you can negotiate the time to see the child, according to the agreement.

The mother has the right to watch the child and call the police if he does not let it.

The woman has the right to watch the child, and if she resolutely refuses to let it, she will call the police to scare him.

The relationship between parents and children is not extinguished by the divorce of the parents. After divorce, the child remains the child of both parents, regardless of whether the child is directly raised by the father or mother. After the divorce, the parent who does not directly raise the child has the right to visit the child, and the other parent has the obligation to assist.

When a party exercises the right of access through the agreement of the civil affairs department or the right of access through mediation or judgment of the court, neither parent shall set up obstacles to enforcement, nor shall refuse to refuse one party to exercise the right, and either party shall bear legal responsibility for infringing on the rights of the other party. Once their rights are infringed, the other party has an independent right to make a civil claim and apply for enforcement. The parties should pay attention to the following aspects in how to exercise the right of visitation.

The right to request access should be exercised. The method and time for exercising visitation rights are to be agreed upon by the parties, and if the agreement is not reached, the people's court is to make a judgment.

If you want to see the child, then ask him to see it, how to say that he is the biological father of the child, they will have blood thicker than water, even if you don't let him see the child, when the child grows up, he will recognize his biological father, the divorce between husband and wife, it has nothing to do with the child, the child is innocent, don't always say that his father is not good in front of the child, there is no need, two people can break up if they can't get together, so that the child's heart will always be full of joy.

The man has the right to see the child.

In the case of divorce, the joint property of the husband and wife should be divided equally! If it is in court, it generally depends on the man and woman who has the financial ability to be the legal guardian of the child, and if the child is not obtained, it depends on how the judge awards the child to pay the child's child support fee on a monthly basis.

If the relationship has not been resolved, they should try to communicate with the woman first, and then further fight for their right to visit the child; If the relationship between the two is already very discordant, you can try to use legal means to achieve your basic wishes.

It shows that the woman feels that the man is unreliable and may bring the child badly.

Or maybe it's a kind of love. The woman still loves the man, so she doesn't want him to suffer and be afraid.

It is possible to sue the other party for visitation with the child. If you still refuse, it is recommended to apply to the court. In any of the following circumstances, the people's courts shall support it:

Article 38 of the Marriage Law stipulates that after divorce, the parent who does not directly raise the child has the right to visit the child, and the other party has the obligation to assist. The method and time for exercising the right to explore shall be agreed upon by the parties, and if the agreement is not reached, the people's court shall make a judgment.

You can apply to the court. (1) The parent living with the child is unable to continue to raise the child due to serious illness or disability; (2) The party living with the child does not fulfill the obligation to support the child or abuses the child, or the party living with the child has a negative impact on the child's physical and mental health; (3) Minor children over the age of 10 who are willing to live with another party and who has the ability to support them; (4) There are other legitimate reasons for the change.

He does not have the right to deprive you of visitation, you can file a lawsuit with the court, and the court will help you out.

There is no divorce, what happens if the woman does not want to see the man.

First of all, you need to go to a law firm for consultation, explain the real situation, and listen to the lawyer's advice. I will deal with it after I have the bottom in my heart, and I will contact someone who has prestige on both sides to deal with this matter.

It should not violate the provisions of the law. The issue of alimony is a matter of individual negotiation and is generally not mandatory by law. Article 37 of the Marriage Law After divorce, the other party shall bear part or all of the necessary living expenses and education expenses for the children raised by one party, and the amount of the expenses and the length of the period shall be agreed upon by both parties; If the agreement is not reached, the people's court shall make a judgment.

An agreement or judgement concerning the maintenance and education of the child shall not prevent the child from making a reasonable demand to either parent, if necessary, in excess of the amount originally agreed upon in the agreement or judgment.