Nikon D60, Sony A350, which one is more worth buying? It is not planned to upgrade the fuselage.

D60, of course.

Sony A350In addition to real-time framing and flipping the screen,There is no advantage worth showing off,Nikon is much better than Sony in terms of performance and technical stability,Sony is simply OEM,Use your own name,Acquired factory。 Although the D60 does not have some limitations on the body motor lens, Nikon is working hard to actively improve the needs of this part of the user, and Sony's SLR lenses are mostly Zeiss, ** relatively high, and the cost performance is not very high.

Nikon D60 has a wide range of users, and communication is more convenient, except for the new A900, Sony SLR is a cold dish. To put it simply, the stability of Sony's machine technology and performance is not very good, and there is less after-sales. The lens is more expensive and not cost-effective.

The most important thing is noise control, which determines the production rate, and today Nikon is the best manufacturer of noise control in the civil aircraft industry, and Canon is second

Of course, the A350 wins out against these two ratios. D60 inherits Nikon's consistent style of squeezing toothpaste, no fuselage motor, dust removal is basically an ornament, in addition, D60 only supports AF-S and AF-I lenses, Nikon's traditional AF lens group has lost its advantage on D60. In last year's sales volume, Sony only made the third place in the SLR.

However, Sony has the most momentum. It has the advantage of sensor production (even Nikon also bought some of it), and acquired Konica Minolta Corporation, which includes the company's lens production advantages. You can see his imposing presence just from the fact that the Sony A350 has 14.2 million pixels.

Select A350

On the premise of not upgrading the fuselage.

The D60 does not support autofocus with Nikon AF lenses, which means that the classic prime lenses that are comparable to those of German imaging are inconvenient. Want to use a Zeiss head? I'm sorry, but not only manual focusing, but also metering.

The A350 works perfectly with Sony lenses and can be used directly with ZEISS lenses!

The A350's LV is one of the most advanced LV systems at present, surpassing the LV of the D90, let alone the D60 without the LV.

The A350 is 14 million pixels and the D60 is 10 million.

The A350 has CCD stabilization, and the D60 does not. The A350 has a dust removal function, which is better than the D60 experimental air flow dust removal.

The last point,Nikon's CCD is provided by Sony,The main difference between the two RAW** is that A350's RAW is about 7-8M,And D60's is about 4-5M,A350**More delicate,More information content。

The A350 wins.

If you don't plan to upgrade the fuselage, it is recommended that the landlord add some money to D80. Both the D60 and A350 are over-the-top products and are suitable for those who plan to upgrade in the future. If you think D80 is expensive, then buy D40.

You can search on Mowgli and Hummingbird to know that the D40 has a better film effect than the D60.

Nikon, Canon, and Fujifilm are old camera brands with good color reproduction, good control, and better imaging quality. Sony、Samsung is a rookie,It's just better in electronics,Color reproduction control is average,There is distortion in imaging。 It is recommended to go to Nikon, Canon, and Fujifilm.

So, you know what to buy.

Nikon is the leader of the cameras, with a good reputation for high sensitivity and noise control, and a high market share.

D60 is an upgraded version of D40 and D40X, the fuselage also has no motor, and the lens with a motor should be selected when matching the head, if you don't plan to have a fever, it is recommended to go to D60+18-135mm One lens to go all over the world, wide angle + medium telephoto, enough, ** is not expensive, not bad.

D60, because the noise of the D60 is well controlled, and Nikon's AF-S lenses are worth the money, the low-cost lenses of the A series are not particularly good, most of them are Tamron lenses, and Nikon's dog mirrors are better than Sony's dog lenses. The D60's noise control is pretty good, with little other than the pixels and live view not quite as good as the A350. If you have a lot of money, it's an AF-S 18-200 DX VR+AF-S 50, and if you have less money, it's 18-105 VR+AF 50

Yuan budget, now buy these cameras are outdated. It's already a phased product.

2. If it is for home use, you can take a look at Pentax KR, the workmanship materials and configuration are better in the entry-level machine, and the optical quality of Pentax Sleeve 18-55 is also good. But the disadvantage is that there are fewer accessories, the lens is not very good, and the warranty is inconvenient.

If you're looking to learn more about photography, check out the Canon 600D or Nikon D5100 kits. Enough for newbies.

When purchasing, it is recommended to have the following aspects:

1. Check the three codes in one. That is, the serial number on the fuselage, warranty card, and packaging.

2. Check whether there are dead pixels in the photoreceptor and whether there are dead pixels in the screen. Of course, it is normal to have dead pixels, as long as the number of dead pixels is not large, and the location does not affect normal use, it is also acceptable.

3. Check whether the various accessories in the package have been unsealed, and whether the lens has entered the dust.

4. Test shoot a few photos.

5. Remember to issue an invoice, now the digital SLR warranty generally requires an invoice.

In terms of lenses, a budget of 5,000 yuan for 18-55 sets of heads is fine. If the budget is around 6,000, you can consider a lens like 18-135 or 18-105, which has a better focal length than 18-55. If you want to take your shots to the next level, the 15-85 or 16-85 is a good choice, and of course the better 17-55 lenses.

For novices, the first lens is dominated by a standard zoom head, and then a wide-angle or telephoto or fixed focal head is added as needed in the later stage.

450d bar, this machine is specially made for beginners, and it is good in all aspects. In fact, I recommend 400D, because 400D has a better failure rate than 450D. It's also great for beginners.

If you don't plan to change the lens, Sony's collocation is more reasonable, and the quality of Canon and Nikon's pullover is not too good.

Nikon D60 (set of about 3600), this camera is very good if you plan to buy a set of games and don't plan to upgrade. The imaging of its set is not inferior to that of 450D, and it is cheaper than 450D. However, since there is no body focus motor, the original lens can only choose the lens of the AF-S, otherwise it will not be able to autofocus.

Therefore, there will be certain restrictions on the upgrade of lenses in the future. Especially for prime lenses, Nikon has a lot of inexpensive and high-quality prime AF heads (50mm

etc.). Since the 450D can be equipped with all of Canon's EF and EF-S lenses, there are no lens compatibility issues like the Nikon D60. Personally, I still prefer to recommend you Canon 450D set (about 4300) +50mm

and more). Many novices choose the pullover +50mm

configuration. The convenience of the head (18-55mm) zoom and the large aperture and high image quality of the 50mm fixed focus can complement each other, which can basically meet the general shooting needs.

The 450D is a machine that has been widely praised since its launch, and it is the most recommended machine among entry-level SLRs. Equipped with 50mm

Known as a small spittoon) can obtain higher image quality, fully reflecting the advantages of SLR machines; The wide aperture can blur the background, which makes for very beautiful exterior portraits. The focal length of the sleeve equivalent to 35mm:, which basically includes the most commonly used focal length of the Mu Yinshen segment, and the random device is generally only more than 300, which is very cheap and worth having for novices.

As for Sony's SLR machine, I am not optimistic, if it is a card machine, it can also be considered. In terms of the entry set, I really can't see any advantages over Canon and Nikon, and the imaging effect is not as good as others, and the sense of hierarchy is not strong; In terms of lens upgrades in the future, Chase's good lenses are not something that ordinary people can afford, and they are strongly not recommended.

Sony's will be celebrated. The lens is too expensive. The low-end ones are not as generous as C and N.

Used 450d. It's good to use. Agitated accompaniment.

D60 is not bad, but it is stupid. And it's a lot cheaper than the 450d.

If you have money, buy the more expensive ones. You get what you pay for.

If you have a limited budget, buy the D60. Check it out on the forums. The ** shot out of the pullover is also very good.

D60 isn't bad.

Now Zhaochun Xiao, whether it is medium and short focus, telephoto, or large aperture lenses, there are all matching, and there are only about 1500 Senmeng, and the imaging is definitely sharper and more vivid than Canon's, and it is also related to the problem of not being out of focus.