Canon 5D Mark II Nikon D600 which is better has been tangled

In terms of lenses, on the contrary, Canon has a richer lens group. Fortunately, Nikon is not too few.

I personally recommend D600.

Nikon's new DSLRs all support autofocus. For example, if a kid comes running from a distance, Nikon can detect auto-focus auto-detect.

Both are full-frame machine lenses, and in terms of the Canon lens, it has a wider aperture of 85, which is a little better when shooting portrait interviews.

Nikon's 85 isn't much the same.

Then Nikon's 24-70 uses a 3D 3 aspherical lens, but fortunately, Canon has just upgraded the 2nd generation of the 24-70 lens configuration, which is basically the same.

The 24-70 of the 1st generation is far behind)

In addition, the D600 has 39 focus points, and the 5D2 has only 9 points, and the D600 is a little better for camera tracking.

When I used Nikon, I found that Nikon's white balance was very inaccurate under street lights.

Later, I used Canon's camera and found that Canon was even more inaccurate.

If it is used in a commercial setting. For example, if you go to shoot a wedding, I'm afraid that 5D2 is more well-known and has more appearance fees. The ** here in Jinan is about 2000 yuan (of course, your skills can't be too bad).

D600 is not yet known to many people. I don't know how much money people can pay.

I just chose the D600 in the tangle of D600 and 5D2. Because the camera can be autofocused, the resolution is 1920*1080, so there is no difference between the two in imaging quality; The high sense of perception is significantly stronger than that of 5D2, after all, 5D2 was a product of four years ago; 3.Some people say that Canon's colors are better, but in fact, today's machines can achieve satisfactory tones by adjusting the color mode.

Buy new not buy old, D600>5D2, but it's best to wait for a month, one is that there is still room for price reduction, and the other is that the ash problem of the first few batches of D600 has not been solved.

If there is some money.

Or the front camera lens is blank.

It is recommended to buy D600 to compare the change of home Not everyone can change it.

The D600 is almost a complete beat to 5DII, but Nikon's lenses are expensive and sharp, making them suitable for cool color styles.

Canon imaging is oily and plump, and the warmth is suitable for portraits, which may be more.

Compared with the Canon 200DII, the Nikon D5600 is still positioned higher.

After all, the Nikon D5600 is a high-end presence among entry-level half-frame SLR cameras. The Canon 200DII is positioned a bit lower. However, the appearance of the Canon 200DII is really beautiful ......This is a ...... that the Nikon D5600 can't match

In terms of handling, both are similar, both are easy to use, and the operation interface is also very friendly ......

As for the question of lens matching......Since it is the main shooting of landscapes and portraits, then, it needs the support of two types of lenses:

To shoot portraits, you need a medium focal length and a large aperture lens. Like what.

To shoot landscapes, you need a wide-angle or even ultra-wide-angle lens. For example, 10-24

If you want to shoot both of these subjects with one lens, then choose Nikon ......The quality of this lens is very high, and it is the head of the golden circle!

Definitely 5600 image quality dynamic details are much better, the lens is affordable 18-140, but if you want the effect of delicate bokeh at different levels, you need to enter a fixed focus in the later stage.

If you shoot portraits, Canon's skin tone is better, Nikon's skin tone must be post-lens, whether Nikon or Canon, it depends on what subject you shoot with what lens Portrait and landscape must have two lenses If you want to say that it is well matched, it also depends on how much money you can pay Generally, the entry is to add a 50 to play first.