Which is more suitable for beginners, the entry level SLR: Nikon D3100, Sony A55, A33 or Sony A550,

The quality of D90 is relatively good, the color reproduction is high, and the sharpness control is also good, but the menu is not very user-friendly, a little complicated, and it takes a certain amount of time for beginners to get used to. If you just want to have fun and don't continue to upgrade in the future, it is recommended to buy Sony A550 to get started, the quality of the fuselage itself is very good, enough to meet the needs of beginners, and even some functions reach the mid-range machine. Also consider the Canon 550D....

Just pick among these three. That's it for the order of recommendation.

I'm a Nikon user, I'll be honest, if you're thinking about buying the D3100, I think you might as well buy the D90, the D90 is now at the lowest price, it's worth buying, in terms of performance, the D90 is also better than the D3100, and the Canon 550D is also a machine worth considering, so you can choose a Sony machine between the D90 or the 550D, and many of my friends around me don't use it after playing for a while.

I just got into the D3000 and it feels good. Except for the low pixel point, the high sensitivity is almost good, Nikon's machine imaging is sharp, the color is good, and the color of the landscape is relatively good. Generally speaking, low-end machines like Nikon are better workmanship than Canon's.

As for the said D3100, it is recommended that you don't buy it now and buy it next year, it will be inflated for a while and a half, and the D3000 is Nikon's last CCD machine.

Nikon D3100 Sony A55 A33D3000 is Nikon's last CCD machine, which is more suitable for beginners.

Micro mirror NEX-5C, D3100, 550D, these are the first to be removed, 3100 is too entry-level, and the hardware and software are all from the previous generation. NEX is a good thing, but you said it, you have to change it in the future, the lens of NEX is too long, but it is lighter and not so portable. Moreover, the E lens and the Sony SLR A series are not universal, so it will be troublesome in the future.

550D,Actually, it's a good entry machine,But it's 500 yuan short of the new generation of 600D,Although 600D upgrades are not a lot,But it's better to buy new electronic products。

A580 is a DSLR, and A55 is considered a single battery. The lens is universal, and it's pretty much the same. The advantage of A55 is that the reflector is removed (so it can't be called a SLR) and replaced with a 30% half-lens, using a DC-like mode, CMOS is directly facing the lens, so continuous shooting is the biggest highlight, and the focusing method is also flexible.

However, because of this, it is worse than A580 in terms of image quality, power consumption, and material aging. And I touched the A55 real machine, it was too plastic.

Nikon is more average, Canon's high-end is very good, Sony, say that 99% of its toys are unused, high-end machines are also very good, there are not many lens groups, but it is enough. Since you like Sony, let's use it. If you are conservative, it is A580, if you change the fuselage in about 1 year, it is good to buy an A55, after all, we also use new technology, hehe.

Since you like Sony, choose this brand.

The A580 is a DSLR, optically viewed.

The A55 is a single electric, electronically viewed vehicle.

These two are basically different framing methods, and the others are similar, it is recommended to use 580, and the optical framing speed is fast.

NEX and the other ones you said are not a type of product, it is a mirrorless, if you want to play professional, don't consider it, there is a gap between control and performance and SLR, especially the control is very different from SLR.

D3100 don't think about it, Nikon should start thinking about it from D5100 at the minimum, 5100 and 580 are in the same grade, but the performance is poor.

550D and 5100 are of the same grade, and the performance is similar, to sum up, A580 is recommended.

It's a pity that I don't have 500d to buy now, 500d is really good.

Why don't you consider Panasonic's single-electric GF3, this machine is excellent!

In fact, Sony's things are not cost-effective at all, and Canon's is the same! People spend a lot of money on advertising, and in the end, the advertising fee has to be counted on the consumerThe wool comes out to the sheep. The models that are also on sale are not cost-effective.

As long as the landlord has the right performance, which one is the most expensive and which performance is good, you get what you pay for!

Buying a DSLR and paying an electric ,,, is a thought difference. It's the same in terms of practicality. The result of buying a DSLR or not is to see if you are willing to spend a lot of money on the camera in the future.

If you have to get started with SLR, you should get a 550D or 600D, first familiarize yourself with Canon's cameras, and continue to go down Canon's path when you have money in the future5D2, 1DS,,, at least the lens can be universal!

The A580, EOS550D are a notch. The A580 is better for amateur use than the 550D. Higher image quality and performance.

A55 is a grade from Nex5C, because the structure is different, the difference is relatively large, and no comparison is made.

The D3100 is the lowest grade.

The first group has the best performance and is best for taking pictures. The image quality is higher than that of the second group. But the video aspect is not as good as the second grade.

The third grade is the lowest.

If it's me, I don't choose either, I'll wait for the A750.

If I choose, I am optimistic about the Sony A580 among the above models, the reason is the 16.2 million back-illuminated image sensor, which has the advantages of clear imaging and low noise; The second is its super battery life, as well as Sony's own 3D panoramic function. Other features are not much different from Canon 550D, it is recommended that since you like it, don't dwell on it, Sony A580 is the best.

Comparatively speaking, Canon's DSLR is very good, recommend EOS60D, this machine is a good choice for photography enthusiasts, enthusiasts, and travelers I prefer the 60D megapixel resolution rotating LCD screen, the new control dial, and the in-camera RAW processing, creative filters and other functions, these functions are the first time to appear on the EOS series of machines, which can make users more handy, and can improve the flexibility of creation

These are Sony 580.,It's the strongest.,It's often compared with other mid-range machines.。。。

I also want to know, and I'm getting ready to get started.

1. All picture quality ......

The reason for this kind of low-level is too much, and Nikon's use of CCD and COMS provided by Sony is a well-known thing.

On the machine, the Sony 550 is stronger than the Nikon D3100 and D5000

1 Nikon system machine, the more high-end the more realistic, choose Nikon at least from the D90, because there is no body motor below D90, and many Nikon lenses do not have their own motors, which means that you will have a lot of classic old men who can't use it in the future, and you have to spend more money to buy lenses that include a focus motor.

2 If you're going to buy a mid-range machine like the D90 or D7000, the Nikon is good, but if you're getting started, Sony's entry-level machine is pretty good. Recommend the Sony 580. With a 16-105 or 16-80ZA Zeiss lens, in the first two years of entry, it should be sufficient, and the body performance is also good.

3 As for the picture quality, this is a problem without standards, some people dislike that the Canon is not sharp enough, some people say that the Nikon image quality is yellow, and some people say that Sony is not good at this and that is not good. But if you really choose a machine, you have to put aside the interference of the brand, and there is also a matter of losing the reflector in a field as big as Canon, and it is not whose market is more or whose product is better. Go to the store and touch it yourself, take a look, find someone familiar and ask.

At least, I've used Nikon, I've used Sony, and my feeling is, in their own way, it's up to you to ask for it. I like the color of the picture, and I feel that the combination of Sony + Zeiss is good.

To be honest, I really don't recommend Sony's machine, the reason is that Sony doesn't have a thick foundation like Canon Nikon.

Personally, I feel that if you really plan to continue to play SLR in the future, it is not a whim, then go to a Canon 50D, 60D, or Nikon D90 or other machines, even if you get a dog head to play first, as a person who has come over, tell you that you are on the Sony A550 and Nikon D3100 D5000, and you will definitely have to change it in less than a year, and when the time comes, you will not only upgrade the lens, but also the body, and you will have to change it It is better to be in place at one time.

In terms of parameters, the A580 is better. But Sony's lenses have not had a good reputation.

The 550D is a bit better than the D3100. After all, there is a fuselage motor. The pixels are also high.

You can take a look at the specific physical object, try the feel with your hand, you will find, although A580 is also a plastic body, but the size design is relatively full, and there is a full feeling of a mid-range machine when you hold it, and the other two are uncomfortable to hold for boys, and the body is too small. The feel of the SLR is very important, but Sony does have few lenses, although there is no shortage of good lenses, but there is less room for choice after all.

The fuselage is constantly innovating, and choosing a DSLR also selects the lens group, which also affects your future fuselage upgrades, lens value preservation and continuous investment. The models you listed are all entry-level models of each company, and after a comprehensive evaluation of the size of the lens group, the cost performance of the lens, and the comprehensive performance of the body, the Canon 550D must be selected. The popularity of the Canon 550D in the market is also evidenced.

It is recommended that you buy 550d, I won't say much else, the brother upstairs said in detail, if you can't decide, you go and take a look at these three machines, compare them yourself, and see which one is more suitable for you!!

I also compared it for a long time when I bought it, and summarized my experience (in fact, the effects of the three photos are almost okay).

Depending on the ones you choose, you want to buy an entry-level camera, and when the technology improves, you can change to a better lens when you have money.

By the time you want to change to a better lens, your body can be eliminated, you know?

So I think it's better to choose the best in the same grade at present,A580Compared with the other two, it's a little more expensive,I bought it,I observed it (I've tried all three real machines)A580From the performance, appearance and quality are compared with other SLR brands in the mid-range products,There is no suspense at all compared with other entry-level SLRs,I don't believe you go to the online information,It's just that everyone thinks Sony's lenses are expensive and less,Or the above sentence,If you're not a poor single person like me,Have the money to buy a good lens, None of these models are suitable for you, go buy Nikon D90 level or above, otherwise the money will be wasted.

Select Nikon 3100Sony does DSLR nondescript. Canon machines under 5d2 suck. The Nikon 3100 delivers outstanding performance.

I'm using the Canon 550d and it feels pretty good.

It is recommended to enter Canon 550D or Nikon D5000, buy new digital products not buy old, Canon is good at technology, its processor is the best among several brands, and its strength is also the strongest in portrait photography, 550D has been on the market for more than a year, **It is also close to the bottom line, and it is better than 500D in technical parameters, and ** is not much different, compared with the 600D that has just been listed, it is very cost-effective, it is recommended to start.

It is recommended to take Nikon for shooting more landscapes, Nikon has gorgeous picture quality and is suitable for landscape shooting, D5000 compared to D3100, although the announced pixels are D3100 higher than D5000

2 million pixels, but in factD5000 is larger than D3100's image sensor, which shows that D5000 is better than D3100 in noise control ability and image quality of the same size**, the difference between the two is only about 300 yuan, it is recommended to go to D5000.

The reason why Sony is not recommended is mainly because Sony has not joined the camera field for a long time, there is no core technical advantage, SLR It is the acquisition of Konica Minolta's product line, and the lens is the technology of Carl Zeiss, although Zeiss is good but expensive, a bit non-mainstream.

In fact, what brand of camera is not the most important, the important thing is to insist on what brand of camera and what lens can shoot good movies.