What is the specific difference between Intel D915 chip and Intel E6300 chip???

Model Core 2 Duo E6300

Applicable Type: Desktop.

Interface type LGA 775

Core type allendale

Production process. Core voltage.

Main frequency: External frequency: 266MHz

Multiply 7x L1 cache L1 32k

L2 L2 2048k

FSB 1066MHz

Model Pentium D 915

Applicable Type: Desktop.

Interface type LGA 775

Core type presler

Production process. Core voltage.

Main frequency: External frequency: 200MHz

Multiplier 14x

L1 L1 32k

L2 L2 2*2048k

FSB 800MHz

The biggest difference between the E6300 chip and the Pentium D 915 is the difference in the core, the difference in the assembly line makes the performance of the 2 CPUs have a large gap, and at the same time, the power consumption of the E6300 is more power-saving In view of the fact that the E6300 has just come out for a short time, it has little advantage in terms of cost performance, so it is recommended to use AlthonX2 3800+ (65 nm) (3800+ and 360++ are twice as different in the L2 cache, and the difference between the 2 CPUs ** is about 80 yuan, 3800+ is better than 3600+Cost-effective so recommend Althonx2 3800+) Today's computer performance can meet most of the uses Unless it is a high-end game or 3D processing, animation production and other purposes, everything else can complete the task, so there is no need to spend a lot of money to buy a high-end CPU in pursuit of the latest technology

A few additions to the upstairs

1,PD915 has been out of 65um, so the heat generation has been reduced, hehe:)2,The main reason for the heating problem I think should be the assembly line problem PD has as many as 31 pipelines, while E6300 only has 14 In terms of data processing errors, PD errors once need more performance to correct errors on the assembly line, and E6300 is relatively much less.

The Intel E6300 chip adopts a new manufacturing process, and the heat is well controlled.

That is to say, the performance has not increased by 30%, but the heat has decreased by 30%, and now it is not suitable to buy an E6300 chip computer, because it is still a bit expensive.

It is recommended that you buy AMD's dual-core Althonx2 3600+ (65nm).

The comrade upstairs is quite right, I add one more point:

PD's dual-core can be said to be a false dual-core, why do you say that? The interaction between the two core implementations of PD is completed from the front-end bus, not from the inside, so the heat generated is relatively high, just like why everyone says that the temperature of PD820 is high, this is the reason, plus the PD80 manufacturing process is 90nm technology, and the heat is greater.

Yes, what I said above is 820,915 is indeed 65 nanometer technology, p4631 is 65 nanometer technology, I think it is more appropriate to buy button meat 2.

ASUS official** said very clearly, this motherboard supports 65nm CPU, while E6300 is a 45nm process, so it is not supported.

Dear users, hello.

It is recommended that you check the CPU model supported by your computer on the official website of Inter Chipset through your motherboard chipset. In addition, we do not recommend that you replace your hardware by yourself, because the new hardware may have compatibility issues, and the hardware problems caused by your unauthorized disassembly will not be covered by the warranty. Hope it helps.

I'm sorry for the CPU even if I can support it with this motherboard...

In terms of performance, the E6300> E5300 > E5200.

In the motherboard with the mountain, with a separate, commonly used P4* chip main motherboard, commonly used P43

If you use a motherboard with integrated graphics, use the main motherboard with the G4* chip. Such as g41, g43, g45. There is a slight difference in the performance of the graphics cards they integrate.

Pentium E6300 is better, mainly reflected in the manufacturing process, Pentium E6300 uses a 45nm manufacturing process, while Core E6300 uses a 65nm manufacturing process, the former is more advanced, and the parameters of both are as follows:

Intel Pentium Dual-Core E6300 Parameters:

Applicable Type: Desktop.

CPU series: Pentium dual-core;

CPU Frequency:;

Slot type: LGA 775;

Number of pins: 775pin;

Number of cores: Dual cores;

Number of threads: Double-threaded.

Intel Core 2 Duo E6300 Parameters:

Applicable Type: Desktop.

CPU series: Core 2 dual-core;

CPU Frequency:;

Slot type: LGA 775;

Number of pins: 775pin;

Number of cores: Dual cores;

Thermal Design Power Consumption (TDP): 65W.

Pentium E6300 is good, although it is a Pentium series, Core E6300 is only a product of the previous generation, but whether it is the main frequency or manufacturing process, Pentium E6300 is better than Core E6300. High-frequency dual-core CPUs still have a great advantage.

Core E6300 clock clock The Pentium E6300 has, obviously.

Of course it's PentiumE6300 good,,New architecture,You can take a look at the online review,It's exactly the same as the Core E7400,It's L2 less1M,And the general physique is OK,I easily went up to the temperature and didn't exceed 45 degrees,Use the radiator of the Red Sea3。 There are a few people upstairs who can't even tell the difference between the Pentium E6300 and the Core E6300, and they came to answer the question and were dizzy.

Something 4 years ago, the core of 65nm?? How to compare??

The full name is: Intel Pentium Core E6300

It's the same thing, it's just a different abbreviation.

It's all a question of what period it is.

The E6300 was a Pentium, and the Core of that period was the Q series such as the Q9300

The current core is the i-series, (i3 i5 i7 ) The level and positioning are very clear, and the low-end core i3 almost suppresses most of the G-series Pentium, and the specific choice can depend on the budget.

Of course, it's Pentium, Pentium is, 45nm, Core is, 65nm, and the other parameters are the same.

The Core E6300 is good.

Core is a new generation of processors and the Pentium is old.

The Core architecture is better than the Pentium, so...

The performance is the same, that is, the Pentium has a small heat and advanced technology.

Of course, the buckle meat is much better than D915! ~!Although the default frequency is only, as long as you match a good motherboard (usually P965 series) and a good graphics card, you can overclock like crazy, and the D915 has a high default frequency, but the overclocking ability is not very good.

However, there is a big difference between the two **, and it costs a lot of money to build a platform for deducting meat 2, and D915 is much cheaper! ~!See you like it! ~!

The difference between BMW 5 Series and 7 Series.

Like you, I'm also choosing between these two U.

e63 people think it's a transitional product, stuff in general.

E74 has 1M more level 2 cache than 63 It doesn't hurt or itch The main frequency is the same But now E74 is occasionally outdated.

Therefore, it is recommended that you buy the E8300, after all, it is the main frequency of the 8 series, and there is a 2-level slow storage of 6m, which personally feels quite affordable, and it is recommended to buy.

To put it simply:

1. The CPU core architecture of the two brands is different.

2. AMD's performance is not as good as Intel's, and its power consumption and heat generation are higher than Intel's.

3. AMD's integrated core graphics performance is better than Intel's.

4. AMD's manufacturing process is a little worse than Intel's.

5. AMD's CPU is cheaper than Intel's.

In the past, Intel completely suppressed AMD, but in the past 5 years, AMD has basically turned over. AMD is characterized by its high cost performance. Intel is mainly ahead of its time, but AMD is more practical for ordinary people.

To put it simply, Intel's cost-effective CPU is only reflected in models around 1400, such as i5 750, while AMD mainly has advantages in the low-end market.

AMD's floating-point computing power is better than Intel's CPU, AMD's core communication bandwidth is large, and the latency of data exchange with memory is low, but Intel's CPU manufacturing process is more advanced and data processing capabilities are stronger. Both have their own characteristics, and no CPU is better than the other.

Upstairs Don't talk nonsense if you don't understand, okay?

AMD's garbage.

It is equivalent to an enhanced version of the E5200, but it still can't fully support the memory of DDR3 1333, and it seems that it is only 1066.

Low-end CPUs, or AMD's are better value.

Both are 1150-pin motherboards H81 entry-level with only a few expansion slots, B85 has a native interface, and the expansion slots have also been added. In addition to the H87, it also has SRT technology (Intel Intelligent Response Technology) Z87 supports overclocking, multi-graphics card interconnection, and SRT also has a variety of rich expansion slots. No overclocking in general.

Just use b85.