What do you think about the university s forcing freshmen to be spectators at the sports day?

I don't think it's good for the school to do that. Many times, when the school organizes various activities, in order to support the scene, it will force some students to participate, especially for freshmen who have just entered college. I didn't understand anything, and I obediently participated.

Forcing freshmen to be spectators of the sports day restricts their personal freedom. The development of the sports meeting is to enliven the atmosphere of the school and drive the enthusiasm of students, and it should be voluntary for students to participate. If new students are restricted from being spectators, it is restricting their freedom, and it is easy to arouse the disgust of students.

Extinguish their enthusiasm. This is contrary to the original intention of the Games and is not conducive to the development of the Games. <>

School is for face. The school may be arranged to allow freshmen to better participate in the sports day, but it is undeniable that it is to make the freshmen stand up and make the sports meeting look popular. This is only surface engineering, and it has no real effect.

Doing this every year just makes students feel that freshmen are going to suffer again, and they will be forced to be spectators by the school as soon as they go to college. It is a common practice, and many times students are not surprised by this kind of coercive behavior, but they have nowhere to sue and have to carry it out. But there's really no enthusiasm for this kind of coercive activity.

In college, it is true that students' enthusiasm for participating in activities is decreasing year by year, and everything is still fresh at the beginning of college, so they will be more motivated, but then there is no enthusiasm to participate. In order to ensure that there are people to participate, the school will indeed make it mandatory to participate. This kind of thing really can't mobilize the enthusiasm of students.

It will cause students to be disgusted, and in order to really want students to actively participate, there must be other measures such as rewards.

I think this thing is quite normal, and there is also such a situation in our school, where first-year students have to go to the ** sports day, and students in other grades are free. It's a common phenomenon that everyone in college seems to have their own things to do, and there is little time to participate in group activities, and sometimes even class dinners or dormitory parties have to be discussed several days in advance. If you want to compete voluntarily, it is estimated that only a few students will go, so the school can only force freshmen to compete.

For freshmen, the sports day may delay some of their own things or time, but the sports meeting also has many benefits. For the school, the sports meeting is held to enrich the life of students in their spare time, strengthen physical exercise, or cultivate some outstanding sports talents, so as to win glory for the school and the country. If there is no one, no one cheers and cheers for the athletes, then wouldn't this game be boring and meaningless?

For an athlete who competes, the stress of the competition can lead to nervous tension and loss of the competition, and if he is not by his side as a classmate or friend at this time, he is likely to perform abnormally if he is not by his side and does not cheer for him to relieve his nervousness. When we go to the stadium and cheer on the athletes, it will play a big role in their competition. In the process of competition, learning from the athletes their indomitable, never-give-up, never-say-die spirit will also be of great help to ourselves.

It is also possible that after the competition, you suddenly like this sport, exercise and strengthen your body.

For some students, they may feel that watching the game is boring and boring, and there may be sun and heat, but as long as you watch the game, every move of the athlete will be concerned by you, and you will be very concerned about winning or losing, which is the charm of sports. Those athletes on the field, they give their best, they fire their firepower, and they don't give up until the last moment of the game, that's the spirit of sportsmanship. These are all things that can only be experienced by ** competitions.

I think that the mandatory sitting in the sports for freshmen is basically something that every university does, and it is also a process that no college student has to go through.

After entering the university, the school will often hold some events, some of which are traditional events that are held every year, and some of which are new ideas for this year. In addition, there are often some activities organized by student organizations and clubs, and since the activities are held, it is natural that there are participants and audiences.

In college, there are very few people who are willing to participate in this kind of activity, and most people are still willing to use this time to do what they want to do, and sometimes even think that it is a waste of time, of course, everyone has their own ambitions, and we can't say who is right and who is wrong. To be honest, many of those who choose to participate in activities are for the so-called credits and moral education points. <>

In the face of some large-scale group activities with low participation or lack of audiences, of course, the school has to adopt certain ways and methods, so since no one wants to go, of course it will be compulsory. In my opinion, there is nothing wrong with it, and these are some of the things that most college students have to go through to a greater or lesser extent. Besides, it's not a big deal, just sit on the field, it's not a big deal anyway, it's just that you need to be prepared for sun protection to prevent sunburn, and the school management is not particularly strict, or you can do some things that you can do at work, for students who play with mobile phones, it's just a change of place to play.

All in all, the sports day is not held very often, once or twice a year, and it doesn't matter.

The freshman watched the sports meeting as a freshman, the sophomore watched the sports meeting as the minister of the student union, and the junior year watched the sports meeting as an activist who joined the party. What does it feel like to be forced to watch the Games for three years in a row? I'm reluctant, but I understand.

The school does have a lot of inhumane regulations, many places need to make up the number of people, first the requirements of the school and college, notify the counselor, and then to the class leader's support group, layer by layer to send notices, to the classmates, basically mandatory passive acceptance, so it will cause dissatisfaction among students.

In fact, from childhood to adulthood, we are all surrounded by rules. The reason why college students are more opposed is that they are more self-conscious, unlike elementary school students who are very obedient to their teachers. But because we are more mature, we should accept these rules that we know cannot be changed and the impact is not particularly large.

You can bring snacks to eat, play, read your favorite books, **, just relax on the sports field. What to do? You say that hostility is not a solution, so it is better to accept it calmly, so that you can bring a good mood to the sports meeting.

Of course, from the school's point of view, the school should pay attention to the way the message is conveyed. In general, the ministers of the school organization are more likely to support the school's activities because they usually hold regular meetings closer to the teacher's thoughts, and then they are in a "high position", often the planner and organizer of the event. But the masses are different, they will want the school to do things all day long, and the activities are boring and compulsory, which I think is a problem worth thinking about in the school.

Particularly inhumane, special formalism. I couldn't understand why the school leaders had to let us sit there and perform. So many of us extras can't even get a box lunch, and we sit there for three days at a time.

I have always felt that the sports meeting is a thing that reflects the spiritual civilization of a school, it is worth advocating, and it is also worth everyone to participate in, but I think that the current university sports meeting is a bit too formalistic, all those exaggerated manuscripts, and all kinds of reporters come to take pictures, take pictures to promote how good the university is, this sports meeting reflects how much college students love sports, how worthy of advocating this spirit, but in fact, All the athletes are carefully selected by the school, and each athlete may have to participate three or four times, because their skills are better, because they run faster, so the school keeps an eye on them, and they are asked to challenge themselves to break the record year after year.

As for the new students, no matter whether the weather is hot or cold, they all have to sit on the stairs, holding the cheering little fat man there, shouting and cheering! It's not from the bottom of your heart at all, it's what forced us! During the sports meeting, I felt very uncomfortable, sitting on the cold big rock, and I had to take the whole class to shout, if the voice of our class is small, the people in the student union will say, how does this class leader do things?

I don't understand, am I the class president, am I a gun in your school? I'll shoot wherever you say, right? Don't I even have a mind of my own?

This is not in line with my concept of life at all, so this kind of forced thing, I will never force it to my classmates, at most they say a word, I repeat a sentence, but the students love to do it or not, for such a phenomenon, I really say heheda.

I was very tired of this kind of behavior at school, and the school held a sports day to let us have a good rest and have fun, but the school did this, but I felt disgusted.

I experienced this kind of thing when I was a freshman sports day, and we were forced to watch the opening ceremony, and we didn't have any opinions, because we only needed to be spectators for more than an hour, but the school asked us to be spectators for two days, yes, two days, because the sports day was held for two days.

I have an opinion on this, why should we sit stupidly in the audience for two days. I like to watch people play, but I don't like people forcing me to watch people play, I hate forcing people to play. No one forced me to watch the game, I might have watched it seriously and cheered for them, but I wasn't that interested in cheering them on.

Also, I like to cheer for people at close range, and the seniors who are a year older than us can cheer at close range, so why should we be tied to the stands. And the counselor also checks from time to time, the counselor does not check and the class leader takes pictures from time to time, just in case you run away, if you want to go to the toilet at that time, the counselor does not see you in **, when you come back, you will be said by the counselor, even if you explain that you go to the toilet, the counselor is also suspicious.

And what I hate even more in school is that those students who get the poverty allowance sit there and watch, that is, the time of study (that is, how much money is paid and how much work is done for the school), and those of us who do not receive the poverty allowance work just like those who receive the poverty allowance. I'm not happy with the school's approach here, we didn't get any money, why are we here.

In fact, all aspects of study and life in the university are relatively free, and the time can be arranged by everyone, but in some sports meetings, some counselors will force students to go to the school sports meeting as spectators. This may cause dissatisfaction among many students, because they think that when it comes to spectators at the school sports meeting, they should participate in their own hospitals, rather than being forced by teachers.

Many students know that they are forced to go to the school sports meeting by the counselor, and they will think that it restricts their activities, because many people at this time, they will appear outside the school with their friends to play, and some people will choose to go home, because they did not participate in the school sports activities at this time, and at the same time, the school time is also relatively free, and there are no other courses, so they will choose to go out, but if they are forced by the counselor to be an audience, I'm sure you don't like it either.

But we should also look at this issue objectively, not to mention the requirements of the school, the counselor let the students go to the school games as spectators, or they may want them to see more of the campus style, because everyone is always nested in the dormitory, or do their own things, so some people rarely contact the school life, so let everyone go to the school games audience, but also let everyone see more campus style. At the beginning of the school sports meeting, many people will go to watch the fun, but few people can really be spectators at the school sports meeting.

But for this kind of coercive behavior, I think it is more important to consider the thoughts of college students, and if it is just to force them to participate, it may make them feel a little resistant. Although it is said that he will be an audience on the surface, he may have a little opinion about the counselor in his heart, so if he can discuss, it is better to discuss with the student and then arrange it.

I don't think it's good to do this, because everyone is already an adult, and I have our own willingness to fight, and it should be up to us to decide what we are willing to do and what we don't want to do.

These counselors force students to do such things, which is too unethical, and how can the school allow counselors to do such things, it is too much.