Is there a video of the football match between the United States and the Netherlands, please everyon

Updated on physical education 2024-04-27
17 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    There is PPS webcast TV on it.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    Brazilian football emphasizes the control of the tempo, with its super individual skills, combined with the connection of the midfield and the wing attack at the back, like the opponent to launch a wave of attacks, Dutch football emphasizes the full attack, the emphasis on the control of the ball, the three lines with the attack and defense, the overall forward pressure and retreat, like the opponent to launch a pressing offensive.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    Dutch football, full offense and full defense, offensive football, very good-looking; As for Brazilian football, samba football emphasizes individual invincibility and is highly enjoyable.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    To put it simply, Dutch football is all about attacking and defending, and paying attention to the whole. Brazilian football is all about attacking, not only to win, but also to win good-looking.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    The Netherlands is all-attacking and all-defending, and Brazil is samba football with an emphasis on gorgeousness.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    Dutch football is actually very gorgeous, such as Ruud van Nistelrooy, Van der Sar and other periods. Dutch football as seen at the World Cup in South Africa is practical, all-attacking and all-defensive, but it cannot change the essence of Dutch football.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    Undoubtedly, it was the deceased Michels.

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    Ruud van Nistelrooy, Van der Sar, Van Bronckhorst, Robin van Persie, Van Bommel van der Vaart, Van Basten, and so much for all.

  9. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    Van Nistelrooy, Van Basten, Van Bronckhorst, Van der Vaart, Van der Meyde, Van Persie, Van Hooydonk, Van Bommel van der Sar, Van Hanehen, Van Schip.

  10. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    Modern football was invented by the British more than 100 years ago, and many people thought that it was the Chinese Keju at the earliest. But Keju is not the earliest, and a stone ball unearthed in the southwestern United States is 6,000 years old. It is very similar to the two games played by Native Americans today:

    One is to pick up the ball with the arch of the foot and see who throws it far; The other is to kick the ball away with the arch of your foot and then run after it, up to 30 kilometers. In 1863, the first football association was established in England, with 22 people on the field, a referee, fixed rules, a field, a time of play, a goal, and even a net. Officially modern football has been proposed and practiced and promoted by many Englishmen, and it is a mystery who first came up with it!

    The reason why the earliest football played by the British is called "invention" is that modern football has too many breakthroughs in content compared to various different football-like games in the past, and this breakthrough is completely a profound revolution. There is a fixed playing time, field, goal, inflated ball (not too light, not too heavy, fast rolling), and there is a division of labor on the field, which is a product of industrialization and the industrial revolution; There are independent referees, which reflect the principle of fair competition; The accidental discovery of the net in use has perfected this first human sport, which has not changed much so far. On October 26, 1863, the English Football Association was founded in London, formulating the first rules of football and announcing the birth of modern football.

    Since then, people have regarded this day as the birth day of modern football. The earliest football game formation was the "nine forwards and one guard" style created by the British, that is, nine forwards, one defender, and one goalkeeper. Later, the "seven fronts and three guards" formation was produced, so that the offensive and defensive forces reached a relative balance.

    In 1870, Scotland created a "six-front, four-guard" formation. Then, the British created the "tower" formation of "1 2 3 5". This formation had a great influence on the development of world football at that time, because it reflected the basic balance of offensive and defensive forces.

    In order to meet the needs of the development of football, on May 21, 1904, France, Belgium, Denmark, the Netherlands, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and other countries initiated the establishment of the International Football Federation (headquartered in Zurich, Switzerland) in Paris. In 1925, FIFA issued a new "offside" rule, which aggravated the defensive task and sharpened the contradiction between attack and defense. According to this, the Englishman Cheevman created the !! in 1930

    This is the !! of **

  11. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    Modern football was invented by the British more than one hundred and fifty years ago. Ancient football was invented by a Chinese man named Zhang Xiaohei, and football was used for diplomacy by the imperial court at that time. So it was introduced and improved by England, and there was modern football....Adopt it.

  12. Anonymous users2024-01-28

    Who invented football? Animation knowledge science will take you to increase your knowledge!

  13. Anonymous users2024-01-27

    There is a song that says, "Unfortunately, they met too early." Perhaps, fans would have preferred to see the Netherlands and Brazil meet in the final of the World Cup, but unfortunately, the two strong teams "collided" early.

    Although the footwork of the Samba Army is not as gorgeous and beautiful as in the past, and the Orange Army has also played a defensive counterattack, it is bound to be a game of flying and stirring lightning, why, because this game is the "dress rehearsal" of the final! Expected winner: Brazil Reasons to win:

    If you can only choose one team, then Brazil must be chosen. Because their uniforms are printed with five stars, the Samba Army, which switched to simple football, has become too scary because of its pragmatism. And the Brazilian team also has an advantage, in the history of the war, they have relied on penalties to eliminate the Netherlands twice, if you really want to play a penalty shoot-out, in fact, the psychological advantage is sometimes very good.

    Approval ratings of both sides:Netherlands:22% Brazil78% Historical record:

    9 times played; Brazil 3 wins, 4 draws, 2 losses World Cup head-to-head record: July 3, 1974 Semi-final round Brazil 0:2 Netherlands July 9, 1994 1 4 Final Brazil 3:

    2 Netherlands July 7, 1998 Semifinals Brazil 5:3 Netherlands (penalty).

  14. Anonymous users2024-01-26

    Netherlands vs Brazil, optimistic about Brazil to win The upcoming Bahol battle is the tenth meeting in the history of the two teams, in the first nine meetings Brazil 3 wins, 4 draws and 2 losses have the upper hand, Brazil scored 14 goals and conceded 13 goals is also a slight advantage, but it is worth mentioning that in the past 10 years, Brazil and the Netherlands have not played each other, the last meeting between the two teams dates back to a friendly match in Amsterdam in October 1999, At that time, the Brazilian team was down 0-2 and scored by Carlos and Cafu to save the line, and the two teams finally drew 2-2. The Netherlands we see now is a practical Netherlands, a mutated Netherlands. Defence seems to be their number one priority, while counter-attacks are their killer arsenal, with Arjen Robben, Snyder and Robin van Persie being the lifeblood of the Dutch team's attack.

    Having said that, I don't think the tactical play of the Dutch team is very familiar. That's right, the Brazilian team has long been in this routine under Dunga's leadership. If you look at Brazil, you can see that they can sometimes be very good, and any opponent can get a lot of chances within 30 meters of the Brazilian defence, but if you make a mistake, it is very dangerous.

    The trident of Kaka, Robinho and Fabiano will make you regret it a lot, and this is the attacking lifeblood of Brazil, and such a Brazil can be feared by any team. There is no doubt that this will be a big battle between the Netherlands and Brazil, neither side will take the initiative to attack, and both sides will do their best to seize the opportunity to counterattack, and the tridents of both teams may shoulder more siege tasks. However, it's probably not the tridents of the two teams that really dominate the game, but more role players.

    The two wingers of the Netherlands, Robben and Snyder, are going to meet opponents this time, McCone and Bastos, two super capable full-backs, it is not easy for the two wings of the Netherlands to break through them, and the stability of the defensive line is also the biggest advantage of Brazil. You must know that their captain Lucio is a god who kills God and sees Buddha kill Buddha, Ronaldo is helpless in the face of him, the Brazilian team plays defense, and the stability of the back line is Dunga's biggest capital. In contrast, the Dutch defence is less reassuring, with Van Brondhorst on the left certainly lacking in fitness and reflexes despite his experience, while Van der Wiel on the right is obviously not reassuring, and Mathieson and Heitinga in the middle are also slightly slower to turn, so there are actually big holes in the Dutch defence.

    However, judging from the goals conceded, the Dutch team has only conceded two penalties so far, but against Brazil, it will not be easy for them to keep Lippo City open, so the defense may make or break the victory of the two teams. Two teams with almost the same style play each other, the key is to see who scores first, once the balance is broken, then the game will be good-looking, after all, once one side falls behind in the knockout round, it will inevitably attack, in this case, no one will choose to be conservative, which will also make the game more beautiful. Personally, I feel that Brazil have a better chance of winning, and the Netherlands will score, but their defense is not reassuring.

  15. Anonymous users2024-01-25

    An international lingua franca is spoken, generally in English.

    Generally speaking, players and referees cannot communicate in detail on foreign courts, but can use hand gestures and tall flags, as follows:

    1. Holding the flag horizontally with both hands over the head is a substitution.

    2. The flag points to the corner flag is a corner kick.

    3. When the flag is held up obliquely, someone is offside at the far point, the flag is raised forward horizontally is someone offside in the middle, and the flag is raised obliquely downwards is someone offside at the near point.

    4, the flag points to the middle kick-off point is the goal is valid, re-serve 5, the flag points to the goal line to indicate the goal kick.

    6. The flag is shaking upwards to indicate that someone has committed a foul.

    7. When the ball goes out of the sideline, which point of the flag indicates that the serve from the side to the attacking side is generally a substitution, offside, foul, sideline ball, corner kick, goal kick, kick-off There will also be some games where the referee and the player can not communicate, mainly the referee, like this year's World Cup.

  16. Anonymous users2024-01-24

    If you watch a football game carefully, the referee first gestures, the players can understand, if there is an argument, no matter which country, you have to speak English, so when you are a football referee, you must be proficient in English, except for the national league, of course.

    Seeking adoption!!

  17. Anonymous users2024-01-23

    It should all be in English, as a professional player has to understand the most basic football vocabulary, if you can't do it, your teammates will help you translate.

Related questions
17 answers2024-04-27

One: The most famous:

1990 World Cup 3rd and 4th place finals: >>>More

11 answers2024-04-27

Sometimes, it is also important to partner with certain players. In a 4-4-2 formation, the two strikers may prefer to play with each other and play a few one-over-1s rather than splitting or passing back to midfield. The two of them are more likely to create and develop a tacit understanding with each other than with other people.

20 answers2024-04-27

OK. Undoubtedly.

However, the professionalism of the goalkeeper in the game determines that he is absolutely different from ordinary players, so if there is no last resort in the game, it is generally not exchanged. >>>More

9 answers2024-04-27

Shoulder touch not only not foul, but also a difficult unloading action, but the ball in the shoulder after the stop if the arm slides, in general, it is a handball, it is recommended that the landlord try not to raise the arm when using the shoulder to make the ball, because the force is all in the shoulder, the arm is not only useless and there will be a hidden danger of handball, and it is easy to cause an unintentional foul, after all, there is no opportunity to explain intentional and unintentional on the field, this aspect of the loss I have eaten, and then clamp the ball. I don't know if the landlord refers to the ball or refers to the player falling to the ground and holding the ball with his leg or hooking the ball with his calf, the former is a samba-style football, and the latter will not foul in general, because after falling to the ground is to protect the ball, and only that way, personal experience feels, usually causes the opponent to foul, but no matter who fouls, or is stealed, or the ball is out of bounds, this situation will not take 10 seconds from the occurrence to the end, after all, the conventional situation will not be too much when the football falls to the ground, the landlord can think about it himself, The above is purely a personal point of view, the landlord combined with the experience of others, summarized and applied to the actual combat will be rewarded.

9 answers2024-04-27

On April 28, 2019, the Italian derby will be played at the Meazza Stadium, and Inter Milan will meet the challenge of Juventus as the home stadium, and these two teams have been challenged many times before, but Juventus has a slight advantage over the record achieved by both sides, and the match now held is also the 290th derby, and this game is not a literal game for Inter Milan and Juventus! >>>More