The delivery man was beaten by the store when he broke down and smashed things, why did netizens sco

Although the two major takeaway platforms have slightly modified the delivery time, they still do not take into account the time of the store's meal, resulting in the pressure of delivery overtime once the merchant explodes. Secondly, the store itself in order to make a profit burst orders, the slow delivery of orders caused the delivery staff to overtime, not only did not understand the other party, but continued to add fuel to the fire when the other party collapsed emotionally, and then when the other party threw the meal, the delivery staff was injured with a big spoon, which shows that such a business not only has no morality, but also has no measurement.

One. A few days ago, a delivery man was waiting for a meal at the restaurant, because the meal was too long and he lost control of his emotions. For a while, netizens had mixed opinions about this matterAlthough a large number of people believe that the store is mainly responsible, there are still some people who believe that the delivery person is the first to do it, and it has nothing to do with the store.

Two. In fact, if you carefully understand the delivery process of the delivery person, you will not question the responsible party, first of all, after you place an order, the store will make the meal, and after the delivery person receives the order, it will show that the delivery person goes to the store to pick up the meal, and the store generally does not have too many orders, Basically, after receiving the order, the delivery staff will be able to get the meal when they arrive, but many stores often do not consider their maximum load, in order to make money to take orders, resulting in the delivery staff arriving at the store for a long time to get the meal, delay the delivery not to mention, overtime deduction is their salary and rating, this kind of store makes money and causes the delivery staff to lose money, do you still blame the delivery staff for waiting until the collapse?

Once when I ordered food at noon, the store I ordered had a burst of orders, and the delivery man called ** to tell me that the scene was a mess, and the store took more than 600 orders, and I couldn't tell who was who, so let me refund it directlyOtherwise, if he is late, he will be deducted money. It can be seen that the store's behavior itself is cheating the delivery staff, so I don't need to say more about who is responsible.

Because the delivery man didn't hit anyone when he smashed something, it was okay to ask for compensation under normal circumstances, and it was wrong for the merchant to hit someone.

If you are late, you will often receive bad reviews from customers, not only no income, but also a large amount of money will be deducted.

Because it can resonate with netizens, there is a time limit for the delivery of food by the delivery staff, but the merchant makes them wait for so long, which is too much.

Because the loss caused by the delay of the store is borne by the delivery staff, once the delivery person is complained, the delivery staff does not pay the merchant, but also compensates the customer, so the procrastination of the merchant, should be scolded.

Because the store is excessive. The restaurant was too slow to deliver food, which caused the delivery staff to be very anxious, so netizens scolded the store.

Summary. Pro, 1When a Meituan takeaway restaurant is attacked and abused by a customer, it can first find the platform and ask the platform to punish the customer.

2.Secondly, if it involves defamation, insult, etc., you can ask the customer to delete the remarks and eliminate the impact and compensate for the corresponding losses, if the customer refuses to delete the remarks, you can sue to the people's court 3If the customer refuses to delete the post, he or she can sue the people's court.

Are you there. Pro, 1Meilunhuai's suspected takeaway restaurant was attacked and abused by customers, and they could first find the platform and ask the platform to punish the customer.

2.Secondly, if it involves defamation, insult, etc., you can ask the customer to delete the remarks and eliminate the impact and compensate for the corresponding losses, if the customer refuses to delete the remarks, you can sue to the people's court 3If the customer refuses to delete the post, he can sue the People's Fala Hand Hospital.

The customer and the merchant are at odds.

Contradiction. Yes.

The purpose is to reply with reason, or it can be to appeal to the platform. After obtaining the evidence, hand over the recording to customer service, and strive to delete the bad reviews and swearing records.

Those who are threatened or intimidated may report the case to the public security organs in accordance with the law, and request that the public security organs handle the suspects in accordance with article 42 of the "Public Security Administration Punishment Law". If, after the police report to the police, the public security organ does not defend the case and does not handle it, and his conduct is illegal, he may file a complaint with the discipline inspection department or procuratorate of the public security organ at the level above and ask the case-handling unit to explain the reasons.

Summary. Hello, Meituan takeaway restaurant can first find the platform when it is attacked and abused by customers, and ask the platform to punish this customer.

Hello, Meituan takeaway restaurant can first find the platform when it is attacked and abused by customers, and ask the platform to punish this customer.

Secondly, if it involves defamation, insult, etc., you can ask the customer to delete the remarks and eliminate the impact and compensate for the corresponding losses.

If the customer refuses to delete the post, he or she can sue the people's court.

If the customer refuses to delete the post, he or she can sue the people's court.

As a result, the delivery man has a particularly serious psychological pressure, and then there may be a situation of passive sabotage, this man has no quality at all, and deliberately blames others from the highest point of morality, hurting the self-esteem of others.

Delivery workers can be very inferior and sensitive. I don't like to be in contact with people. When I encounter someone scolding, I don't know how to fight back. Insecurity,

It seriously affects the mood of the delivery person, brings psychological shadow to the delivery person, affects the other party's work, affects the other party's life, and brings great psychological pressure to the other party.

Summary. Legal basis: Article 246 of the Criminal Law: Whoever publicly insults others or fabricates facts to slander others by violence or other means, and the circumstances are serious, is to be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years, short-term detention, controlled release, or deprivation of political rights.

The crimes in the preceding paragraph are to be dealt with only if they are told, except where they seriously endanger social order and national interests. Where the victim complains to the people's court about the conduct provided for in the first paragraph through information networks, but it is truly difficult to provide evidence, the people's court may request that the public security organs provide assistance.

Hello Depending on the specific situation and be careful, if the fault is on the rider, you need to accept the punishment of the platform, and if the circumstances are serious, you will also need to be punished by the law. Where violence or other methods are used to openly insult and disrespect others, or fabricate facts to slander others, and the circumstances are serious, a sentence of up to three years imprisonment, short-term detention, controlled release, or deprivation of political rights is to be given.

Legal basis: Article 246 of the Criminal Law: Whoever openly insults others or fabricates facts to slander others by violence or other means, and the circumstances are serious, shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years, short-term detention, controlled release, or deprivation of the rights of the Politburo. The crimes in the preceding paragraph are to be dealt with only if they are complained, except where they seriously endanger social order and the interests of the Guotong family.

Where the victim complains to the people's court about the conduct provided for in the first paragraph through information networks, but it is truly difficult to provide evidence, the people's court may request that the public security organs provide assistance.