What will be the impact of the Prime Minister s alleged misleading of the Queen?

British Prime Minister Wilson was accused of misleading the queen to make decisions to interfere with the normal conduct of parliament, which has attracted a lot of attention, and the United Kingdom has also said that it will file a lawsuit against British Prime Minister Wilson to the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom。What happened for a while? If it's true, then British Prime Minister Wilson is highly likely**.

As we all know, Britain has been a constitutional monarchy since the Industrial Revolution, and although it retains the imperial system, the greatest power is the parliament, and the king is a role that exists in name only, but as a king still has a lot of power, after all, for Britain, the king is a national symbol and a façade. According to the British Constitution, although the king has no way to interfere with the decisions of Parliament, he still has the power to decide on the convening of Parliament. Although the royal family has no power, people in Britain still have a lot of respect for the royal family.

This is also a very important relationship with the development of British culture, as a king, he is generally very assertive, even if he occasionally can't think about it, he will seek the opinions of others, and the Queen of England is no exception. Now that the UK is in the midst of a Brexit turmoil, some people led by the British Prime Minister want to speed up Brexit, but not all the people in Parliament support the Brexit plan, and some people even raise objections and plan to convene ParliamentHowever, Wilson misled the queen to adjourn the parliament at this time, which obviously hindered the normal holding of the parliament. It was also a decision that affected the whole of Britain, and Wilson's misleading of the queen violated the British constitution, and if this was confirmed, it would also have serious consequences for Wilson.

What the British Prime Minister should do to the Queen of England does violate the British Constitution and the laws of the country, which also puts the Prime Minister at risk of stepping down. However, it is also impossible to know the truth through these vain and sympathetic efforts, which can wait for the subsequent development and wait for the court's verdict.

I think it will definitely have an impact on their life, after all, there are some bad things, and then it will drive their development

There will be some bad influences, and there may even be a crisis.

It will definitely have a big impact on his own status, and it is possible that **.

I think this impact will definitely be there, just look at the follow-up and impact of this matter.

In fact, it can be predicted that this is very unfavorable to the British Prime Minister and has the best risk.

This is actually very bad for the British Prime Minister, and even has an impact on his career.

British media pointed out that this ruling leaves Johnson ** facing charges of misleading the Queen, if it is confirmed that Johnson misled the Queen to approve the resolution of the parliamentary adjournment.

The Queen of England was able to remove the Prime Minister. According to the law, the Queen of England is the commander-in-chief of the three British armed forces, and the Queen has the right to repeal laws and the Prime Minister, all laws must have the consent of the Queen, and the Prime Minister must dissolve Parliament and conduct parliamentary elections with the consent of the Queen.

Overview of the Queen of EnglandThe Queen of England is the female monarch of the United Kingdom. The British monarch is the head of state of the United Kingdom and its overseas territories, and the male monarch is now called the king and the female monarch is called the queen. The current monarch is Queen Elizabeth II, who was confirmed on February 6, 1952 and officially crowned on June 2, 1953.

In the United Kingdom, the queen is above the law, but she is usually a law-abiding person. No one can sue the Queen, have no right to have the Queen present to testify, and no one can pay taxes on the Queen. And so on and so forth, all of which are the privileges of the Queen.

But everyone knows that the queen not only takes the initiative to pay taxes but also abides by the law, which is her personal charm.

It is generally accepted that the Queen's favorite prime minister is Churchill, and the most hated prime minister is Margaret Thatcher. But as the Queen of England, she doesn't often participate in government affairs, so she and the prime minister are basically interpersonal interactions.

The favorite should be Truss, and the most hated is Prius, this queen is indeed love-hate, and these 15 prime ministers are all appointed by her personally.

Her favorites should have been Wilson, Churchill, Macmillan. The most hated should be Margaret Thatcher. Margaret Thatcher was a very independent woman, and her relationship with the Queen of England was poor during her reign.

Nominally, the Queen of England has the greatest power in the United Kingdom and is entirely at her discretionPrime Minister of the United KingdomBut generally, the Queen of England does not do this, as Britain isConstitutional monarchy

How to put it, if it is not about real power, then the power of the Queen of England is the largest in the whole of the United Kingdom, and she can decide the affairs of the whole of the United Kingdom at will, including the removal of the prime minister. But from the perspective of real power, the Queen of England has no real power, let alone the power of the British Prime Minister, because Britain established a constitutional monarchy in 1688, to put it bluntly, I let your monarch continue to exist, which can be regarded as a platoon, but there is no real power, that is, as a mascot. This can be said to be a compromise of the old British society to the new British society.

So, stop thinking that the Queen of England has a lot of power, let alone that she can remove the British Prime Minister, because that is only nominal power, not real power, and if she really does this, the British constitutional monarchy will not exist.

One thing to say, from the perspective of real power, the Queen of England is a mascot, because of the existence of a constitutional monarchy, the king or queen of the United Kingdom has no real power, it is only a courtesy duty, such as meeting with foreign leaders and the like, it is not allowed to meddle in the domestic affairs of the United Kingdom. Many people will reply to me, not to say that the Queen of England is the supreme commander of the three British armed forces and can appoint and remove the prime minister, and she is also the head of Parliament. Whoever says that, I can only say that you are the frog at the bottom of the well.

Because it's all nominally, if the Queen of England does this, she's undermining the constitutional monarchy, and the UK will be unstable, just like basic mathematics.

Can't shake the same. And the so-called head of parliament, that is the House of Lords.

is a place dedicated to the Queen of England and the nobility to entertain themselves, while the House of Commons.

is the real authority, the British Prime Minister is elected by the House of Commons, and then politely goes to the Queen of England to accept the appointment!

In general, if you don't stand in terms of real power, the Queen of England is the most powerful person in Britain and can remove the prime minister. But from the perspective of real power, the Queen of England has no real power and cannot remove the British Prime Minister.

The Queen of England does not have the power to remove the Prime Minister. Prime ministers are appointed by the monarch, but they are appointed on the recommendation of the leader of the party with the most seats in the lower house. Once appointed, the Prime Minister will remain in office until they resign or lose the trust of the House of Commons.

The Queen of England is a constitutional monarch who performs ceremonial and symbolic duties, but does not have any ruling powers.

The British monarchy is a constitutional monarchy, which means that the power of the monarch is limited by laws and customs, mainly ceremonial and symbolic. The real power lies with the Prime Minister and the elected MPs.

The queen has to stamp all the political documents to pass, but she can't remove the prime minister, because the prime minister has more power.

The British royal family has the right to appoint and remove any member of the cabinet, which means that the British king can remove the prime minister from the post of prime minister at his own discretion.

I'm a physics major, but I can't bear the nonsense below.

Britain is a constitutional monarchy, and the size of the king's power is determined by Parliament. Although the king is the head of state of the United Kingdom and the prime minister is the head of state, the prime minister is in charge of the direction of the entire country, and the king is only the nominal head of state.

No, the head of state is the prime minister and has the highest real power. The Queen of England is only the nominal head of the Commonwealth, with no real power, more of a symbolic meaning, and can neither influence the election of the British Prime Minister, nor interfere in the work of the Prime Minister, let alone remove the Prime Minister.

No. The country is not ruled by the monarch, but by the democratically elected leader of the first sedan chair party, authorized by the monarch to form a ** to govern, the monarch can make "suggestions" to the prime minister, but can not interfere with the prime minister and the cabinet for governance. The British monarch only plays some ceremonial roles, such as convening parliament and speaking on behalf of the monarch.

Of course. The Queen is the largest in the country. She has supreme power.

In principle, the Prime Minister is only her butler and is responsible for carrying out the Queen's decisions.

No, the Prime Minister is the de facto owner of state power and is responsible for managing the affairs of the country; And the queen is only an honorary position, and has no real power.

No. The Queen of England is the monarch, a symbol of power, and she is not a regent. The day-to-day administration of the country is the sole responsibility of the Prime Minister.

Nominally, the Queen of England is the head of state, and the Prime Minister is the head of the ** In the United Kingdom, the Queen is an important part of the legislative process, and she, together with the Upper House of Leaders and the House of Commons, constitutes the entire legislature. But in reality, the power of the queen is only symbolic. The Queen was able to legally approve or veto an early decision act, but no British monarch had ever vetoed a bill since 1707.

If you don't listen to the queen, the administration of the national raid code can make your own decisions. The current queen is only a symbol of the state and has no real power. For example, the king of Germany and the emperor of Japan are all similar, just the façade of the country. Heng Hall.

No. The prime minister is the actual owner of state power, and his brother is responsible for managing state affairs. And the queen is only an honorary position, and there is no real power.

Nominally, the Queen of England has the largest power shield in the United Kingdom, and she can decide for herself whether the British Prime Minister will go or stay, but generally speaking, the Queen of England and Han Zeguo will not do this, because the United Kingdom is a constitutional monarchy.

No, because the United Kingdom is a parliamentary monarchy, and the Queen of England is the nominal head of state.

The English Prime Minister deals with all things in the country, and the formulation of national policies must be approved by the Queen.

Of course, the British Prime Minister has to listen to the Queen.

Of course, the queen is the largest in the country. She has supreme power.

The United Kingdom is a constitutional monarchy, so there is a prime minister and a queen.

The United Kingdom is a parliamentary constitutional monarchy.

Its main feature is that the parliament is not only the highest legislative organ of the country, but also the highest organ of state power.

The Parliament-elected Heads of State is the real centre of state power. The monarch is the symbolic head of state.

Most of its duties are ceremonial.

Parliament holds legislative power, and the Cabinet is formed by the majority leader of the lower house of parliament, who is the prime minister. The Cabinet holds executive power and is supervised by and accountable to the Parliament. The monarch has no real power and performs ceremonial duties. The Cabinet is elected by and accountable to the Parliament.

There are still many similar countries, such as Japan, a little devil. It is the product of the bourgeois revolutionary compromise of those years.

Yes, in fact, the Queen of England is just an image representing the country, and has no real rights.

Britain is a constitutional monarchy, so the Queen of England has no rights, and the Prime Minister is the one who really has the rights.

This is a ritual because the Queen of England is the symbol of the United Kingdom, so the trusted prime minister of the United Kingdom needs to be appointed with the Queen, which is a constitutional monarchy.

Because in the United Kingdom, the queen is formally the largest owner of power, and the current British political system is a parliamentary constitutional monarchy.

Yes, indeed, but this is only a formality, and now the banquet in the British political system is that the prime minister is democratically elected, and then let the queen go to the stove to go through a formal appointment.

The British Prime Minister has more power. The Queen of England is only a symbol of power in the United Kingdom, and does not hold real power, they perform their own duties and do not interfere with each other.

The queen actually has little power, but in the hearts of the British, the royal family is the representative of the United Kingdom. The Prime Minister is the leader of power and has decision-making power, and is the supreme leader. They're doing their jobs!

Prime minister. The Queen of England is the symbol of the entire Commonwealth, and only plays a symbolic role, while the Prime Minister has the actual power to administer.

First of all, the Queen and the Prime Minister must obey Parliament, but the Queen is the nominal head of state, and without the appointment of the Queen, the Prime Minister holds office illegally. So relatively speaking, it is still the queen who has great power.