How to fight f22 in case of battle, how to fight f in case of battle

Special forces infiltrate airfield raids (individuals oppose the destruction of airfields with ballistic missiles, which would lead to further escalation of the war).

By giving full play to the numerical superiority, we should strive to shoot down them through a saturation attack with long-range air-to-air missiles (the gap in missile technology between fighters is the easiest to bridge, and there should be sufficient technological accumulation in peacetime) by mixing advanced fighters with slightly backward fighters (a ratio of 1:10).

If the F22 enters Chinese territory, it can use the radar network in the interior to monitor (stealth materials cannot target radars in all bands), fighter jets scattered in the mountains to patrol and guard (use terrain clutter to prevent detection) and stand by (as the Israelis do), and quickly assemble and launch an attack when the F22 approaches (spy satellites are difficult to monitor dynamic targets) in an effort to engage in a short- and medium-range dogfight. It is also possible to use anti-aircraft artillery that does not rely on radar to shoot enemy aircraft.

In general, the F22 is very advanced and puts a lot of pressure on the territorial air defense of our country, but the number of 12 is not enough.

The answer upstairs is not very feasible.

In fact, now our country has a new active phased array radar that can detect F22 and guide surface-to-air missiles to attack, but this is for roadbed attack, and this kind of radar can only be used on roadbed or large ** and early warning aircraft.

In the case of air combat, it's about who was locked by the other side first, and the airborne radar of our country's fighter planes lagged behind the United States, and the stealth performance was also a notch behind, so in this case, it was necessary to use the assistance of fighters, such as the formation of early warning aircraft and fighters, and use early warning aircraft to provide support.

However, as the only fourth-generation aircraft in the early stage, the F22 has quite strong air combat performance, and there will be great losses when sending fighters to attack, so it can only rely on the roadbed for effective defense.

You're worrying too much, and although it's your responsibility, it's a very complex system problem to fight a fourth-generation fighter, and people who know won't tell you and can't tell you, and you're basically guessing.

Hit it chicken nest, no matter how advanced it is, it is impossible to fly 24 hours a day.

Blew up its base, see how he can go there?

Make every possible effort. Broken jars, broken and broken

The reason why I am afraid of F22 is because it is very difficult to detect it, and as long as you can find it, you have a chance to hit it.

With anti-aircraft missiles, with air-to-air missiles for fighters.

Use the cannon between your legs and your brain.

Let me start by saying that this hypothetical probability is basically equal to 0

Leave it alone, there's no way to deal with it anyway. Persimmon picks up the soft pinch, who has the disease to find the hardest dry rack? How do you look at it, the most prominent piece of equipment in the four armed forces is the F-22.

Although "avoiding the edge" is much easier said than done, in simple terms, this is the only way to avoid complete defeat. For example, Iraq threw some ballistic missiles out when they were not yet the top priority targets, and also caused some ** in Saudi Arabia, almost forcing Israel to enter the war, causing a lot of political pressure. In the case of overall weakness, ballistic missiles were the only ones capable of striking the rear, and at that time ballistic missile defense technology was just a concept that had not been proven, so it achieved certain success.

Of course, this is partly due to the fact that Iraq's ballistic missiles were not regarded as a major threat in the initial assessment, and then Iraq's ballistic missile forces were completely wiped out after the attack on the SCUD was concentrated for both political and military reasons.

It's your bad technique of dodging missiles.

Or you can use cheats.

6: Hurricane (Tempest).

The missile frigates Dalton and James are hindering the SEALs from reaching the assembly point, bombing them.

The Raptor squadron was ordered to destroy two missile ships and clear the area of the assembly point.

Primary Objective: Destroy 100% of the Naval ForceDalton JamesonSecondary Objective: Bonus Objective:

Defeat condition: 10% of the ground forces Triton destroyed.

If there is already such information, even the AGM-84 mounted externally can be safely attacked from a safe distance. I don't remember yet that there were air defense systems capable of knocking out AGM-84.

Fly above the clouds and blow them up with air-to-surface missiles.

Cheats are not very interesting to use, and the air combat game itself is about technology. It's better not to use it! And the use of ammunition unlimited cheats is not really unlimited, at best, there is no need to land for replenishment, and the total number of missiles will still be reduced!

The game is not particularly realistic, the missile is relatively easy to hit head-on and rear-end, and it feels like it can basically hit the cone area of about 30 degrees, which is also applicable to you and the enemy. That is to say, pay attention to your radar when the enemy's missile hits, and when the missile approaches, there will be a red line, so keep the red line perpendicular to your flight direction as much as possible, and there is a high probability of dodging. In the same way, in order to hit the enemy, try not to launch in the direction of flight of the enemy aircraft.

Up, down, left, right keys to control the attitude of the aircraft.

6 0 keys to control the aircraft throttle.

F1, F4 and several other keys control the viewing angle.

1 4 Keys Select**.

Spacebar Launch selected.

g Put down the landing gear wheels.

f Put flaps.

j Skydiving. tab lock.

The above is just the most basic operation, I think you can completely take a look, you can search for more detailed existing ones).

F22 is okay, the difficulty is relatively low, and it belongs to the rookie level. In addition, the MiG-29 (also produced by Novalogic) is of the same class, and the installation file is slightly larger. You can play with it.

Strikefighters2 has good graphics and a level of realism, which is more fun than both of the above. Lock On is a more advanced flight simulation game.,It's more complicated.,I can't open it so far.。

It should be said that it is very difficult, we can't see it, we can't catch up, we can't fight, even if we carry out offensive air patrols or even simply bomb or escort it, we don't have any advantage at all. After the JDRADM enters service, it may be the anti-aircraft missile and radar stations that will suffer.

As you say, it's really going to be with the naked eye. In fact, the F-22 is not easy to control the infrared signature, cruising at a speed, even without afterburner air friction can produce more obvious heat. The F-22 is supposed to use some kind of coating to divert energy in the infrared band to other wavelengths to reduce radiation (and possibly to absorb radar waves), but there is no evidence of its effectiveness.

It's the same with the spout, we know that the F-22's spout is more advanced than the Loan on the JSF, but how effective is it exactly? I don't know.

As a result, even if the F-22 is detected, the only effective means of engagement is to engage with infrared missiles or cannons within visual range. Except for the J-10 and J-11, there is no chance of winning in this range of active aircraft.

It would be false to say that the F-22 is leaky, but it may be true that you have to pay 10 times or 100 times more if you want to fight it down.

As long as the F22 is off the ground, we can't shoot it down under normal circumstances at the current level, unless the Americans make their own mistakes like the F117.

The best way to deal with the F22 is to end the bird's nest and strike at the airfield so that he cannot take off, and the means is long-range missiles. This one is a bit difficult.

In addition, for the F22 that has taken off, the goal is to cut off his connection with other fighters, especially the tanker, and to knock out the opponent's tanker at any cost, the tanker F22 is equivalent to one less wing.

Another point is that the United States will not go deep behind enemy lines with just a few F22s, this is a very wrong idea, F22 must be dispatched with B2 to form a formation to collectively go behind enemy lines to bomb places, F22 is just a role of guard, so F22 will not risk attacking close to the ground, just to ensure the safety of B2 at high altitude, don't forget that B2's ** is higher than F22. The most likely to find F22 are multistatic radar and passive radar, which are all immature technologies, and even if they are found, they don't know if it's F22, and they don't know the specific target location, so it's almost equivalent to finding nothing. Another point is that F22 and the traditional 3 standby formation play the role of a front-line killer, F22 breaks into the front line, the third-generation aircraft in the rear turns on the radar to obtain enemy information, and F22 plays the role of an assassin, and the missile is launched at a long distance to flash people, so you don't think that F22 will fight with you in close quarters with real guns.

It should be possible to shoot down. Stealth technology is achieved in two ways, absorbing materials and stealth shapes. Stealth fighters, whether it is the F-117 or the F-22 and F-35 today, use these two technologies, that is, the use of superior absorbing materials to paint the fuselage, and the use of special materials to reduce infrared radiation in the engine nozzle, for example, the straight lines of the fuselage, all of which reduce the radar reflection area (RCS).

But in any case, these technologies only realize the "stealth" of stealth aircraft in a specific radar band, that is to say, we can achieve anti-stealth or even shoot down by changing the band and frequency of our radar, as well as the tracking band of missiles, and the Yugoslavs used this method to shoot down the F-117 that was invincible at that time in the Kosovo War. Brother Ren downstairs also has a point, if the radar can't see it, how can the Americans' AWACS aircraft see it? However, it needs to be added here that it is possible for the Americans to use satellite navigation to command fighter jets, that is, to use satellites to collect data, and then transmit this data to early warning aircraft, and some early warning aircraft agree to collect and compile and complete the command.

A sentence that doesn't have so much explanation: unless it's a blind cat that meets a dead mouse, it's impossible to beat it down.

But the F22 can't take off and land on an aircraft carrier, as long as the missiles blow up several airfields, it can't land, and it will fall when the oil runs out.

If it is discovered deep into the interior, it is possible, his combat radius is 1100 kilometers, probably in the Beijing-Tianjin area, of course, the premise is to find it, but it is difficult.

Ridiculous, it can't be detected only in the cruising state, once it wants to launch an attack, the target will be exposed, and in the cruising state, it's just that the radar reflective surface is small, and the infrared radiation is only in the tail spray part, don't listen to the Americans scared and bragging, then how do the Americans know that the aircraft is now **, how to command the battle of the AWACS aircraft.

Only ultra-low altitudes can be seen with the naked eye, and with anti-aircraft machine guns it can be knocked down.