Is it reasonable for the school to stipulate that students can only buy things from the school s in

This is a disguised economic monopoly of the school, and it is also a helpless move to protect students from social harm in order to achieve exemption, but in general, the school still uses this way as a means of economic **, although it is all small consumption, but multiplied by hundreds of thousands of people, this number is very considerable. As pointed out in the question, then this is illegal in broad daylight, how can students go outside the school to buy things and link it to the comprehensive assessment, this is obviously absurd, whether from the moral or legal point of view, the school has no sufficient reason to do so, so manage the students, give a good reason first!

It's not necessarily reasonable, but it's a very helpless thing.

Because the school gate is not called out during the school day, because if something happens, the school will be responsible, so you have to buy it in the school.

In the same way, if you eat something in school, the school will also be responsible!

Unreasonable, purely indiscriminate. It is recommended to complain to the education department or expose to the society.

If it is unreasonable, it is recommended to complain to the competent department of education or expose it to the society.

Breaking the law, seriously breaking the law. Sue them at the Education Bureau! But look for proof! And tell **, they like this kind of thing the most!

Normal, what can be done, this is our education department, they are all virtuous, are they still qualified to educate others?

If the price is fair***, you can also say that the school is afraid that it is not safe for you to buy outside. However, according to what you said, it is absolutely unreasonable, and you should go to the Education Bureau to sue them!!

Whatever the purpose of the school, this kind of thing is absolutely unreasonable!

It depends on your school's acceptance letter.

If that's written.

Schools can get away with it.

and your school's regulations.

This question is troublesome.

In the past, we had a very powerful child in the family who was dissatisfied.

It took a lot of money and only made the school lose a little bit.

It also caused a lot of trouble.

It depends on whether the state has more feasible measures to protect our students.

The Ministry of Education has stipulated that all junior high schools are not allowed to open commissaries.

The Beijing Municipal Education Commission issued the "Notice on Further Standardizing the Diet Management of Primary and Secondary Schools", which clearly stipulates that primary and secondary schools shall not ** carbonated drinks and other foods and beverages that are not conducive to health. The circular also stipulates that, except for boarding schools, primary and secondary schools are not allowed to open commissaries on campus in principle.

The "Outline for the Reform and Development of Education in China" issued by the Communist Party of China and the "Education Law of the People's Republic of China" passed by the National People's Congress have made provisions on the state to take preferential measures to encourage and support schools to carry out work-study and social services, and to set up school-run industries.

The Ministry of Education's "Decision on Implementing and Comprehensively Promoting Quality Education". Several Opinions on Further Accelerating the Development of School-run Industries in Primary and Secondary Schools" proposes to vigorously develop school-run industries and social services, and gradually establish a service system to support educational reform and development.

The main intention of educational institutions to set up campus supermarkets or commissaries is to allow schools to increase school operating income under the premise of standardized operation, and also to facilitate the work, study and life of teachers and students.

However, judging from the actual situation, there are many problems, and they are widespread, including the expansion of the sales scope of the campus commissary, the sale of three-no food, dangerous toys, etc., and there are many complaints from parents.

90% of the campus garbage in the campus environmental sanitation problem comes from the campus commissary, which promotes the bad habit of some students to eat snacks, junk food endangers the health of students, and some students compare with each other and ask each other to eat in the commissary.

It is not allowed to open a store in a school, which is regulated by the local education bureau, after all, opening a store in a school will increase the burden on parents, and let children eat snacks indiscriminately, which will cause health problems.

This school or the Education Bureau, right?

In the past, there were kiosks in schools, which was funny to think about. Everyone has experienced it, but now that there is an extra meal, the students should not be too hungry. You have to prepare your own school supplies.

There is a commissary, to the children's tuition, the children can go to the commissary next door to buy, buy, buy, and then the teacher informs the parents that the tuition is not enough, the child goes to the commissary, it is not good to return the ......

The store is a monopoly in disguise, as for whether the school is illegal or not, it depends on how it "restricts", if the school sees students bring things from outside into the school, it does not let the students in, then it is illegal. Violates students' right to free choice as consumers.

The contract between the school and the store does not stipulate that the student is restricted from going out to buy things, they can only make a private agreement. Their contract should be legally valid.

Yes, the school does not have the right to interfere with students buying things outside of school.

It's illegal!

You can sue them!

How to sue ah, seek knowledge and convince this school.

Students have the right to choose where to buy and the school cannot restrict.

Legal Analysis: No, Article 23 of the Education Law only stipulates that the people at all levels and their relevant departments shall maintain order around the school in accordance with the law, protect the legitimate rights and interests of students, teachers and schools, and provide security for the school. In order to maintain order around the school, there are corresponding measures in the local area, restricting Internet cafes, game halls, etc., not including shops.

Legal basis: "Education Law of the People's Republic of China" Article 26 The State formulates plans for the development of education and organizes schools and other educational institutions. The State encourages enterprises, public institutions, social groups, other social organizations, and individual citizens to establish schools and other educational institutions in accordance with law.

The state shall adhere to the principle of diligence and thrift in running schools and other educational institutions. Schools and other educational institutions that are organized or participated in with financial funds or donated assets must not be established as for-profit organizations.

This is certainly unreasonable, and you can choose to complain to the Education Bureau or the relevant department.

Forcing students to buy materials at designated bookstores is likely to result in a private agreement between the bookstore and the teacher, who can profit from the sale of the textbook. This is a violation of the relevant regulations.

You can write a letter or ask the local education department for help through a complaint**, and the education bureau has relevant regulations, and the relevant teachers can be criticized and punished.

If the school requires students to purchase the materials at the designated bookstore, whether this behavior is reasonable should be analyzed on a case-by-case basis.

First of all, as an educational institution, the school has the responsibility to provide students with the necessary learning resources and materials to ensure that students can successfully complete their studies. If the school is able to provide the information and materials required by the students in the designated bookstore, then this behavior is reasonable.

However, it is unreasonable or unethical for a school to purchase materials at a designated bookstore because it has an interest in the bookstore, or to force students to purchase expensive materials, or to restrict students from buying elsewhere.

Therefore, the school's motives and students' interests need to be considered when judging whether the school reasonably requires students to purchase materials at designated bookstores. If the school's actions are for the purpose of providing quality educational resources to students and do not infringe on the interests of students, then this behavior is reasonable. Otherwise, it is not advisable.

Irrationality. The school's practice of requiring students to buy materials at designated bookstores will violate the principle of fair market competition and affect students' freedom to purchase materials. Schools should respect students' purchasing rights, maintain market fairness, and allow students to have more choices to make more choices, which is more reasonable.

It is certainly unreasonable, teaching aids are to help students learn outside of class, and the school can refer to the bibliography, but it cannot restrict students' freedom to buy.

Parents can choose bookstore A or bookstore B. There is the right to choose freely, and it is taking leniency.

When students attend classes in school, they sometimes need to use certain teaching materials, and generally schools list the name of the book and let students and their parents buy it by themselves, but some places will also require students to go to a designated bookstore to buy it.

In my opinion, there is a certain problem with the school requiring students to go to a designated bookstore to buy relevant teaching materials. It is understandable that a specific teaching and auxiliary materials are needed in school classes, but this teaching and auxiliary materials must not only be in a certain group of fighters bookstores, but also in other bookstores, so it is completely okay for students and family members to buy according to their own circumstances, but if you ask to go to a specific store to buy, this practice is unreasonable.

The course only requires a certain textbook, and it doesn't really matter which bookstore you buy it from. In other words, if the school has selected a certain business for students and parents in order to ensure the quality of the books, then why not buy it in the name of the school through a more preferential **?

In fact, whether it is teaching materials or teaching aids, the school should not ask to go to a certain bookstore by name, whether there is a problem or not, I hope that the school will not make such a decision.

It depends on the situation of the designated book. If the designated bookstore is reasonable and the materials are rich, then it is reasonable to buy materials in the bookstore. However, if it is expensive or the variety of materials is limited, then students can try to buy materials at other bookstores.

From a teacher's point of view, it is indeed unreasonable, but it is also a helpless move.

Certainly not reasonable. Because you pay for the book, you have the right to decide in ** to buy. The school has no right to interfere.