The difference between Pentium D and Sparkum 3000

Sembleon is a product of the same grade as Celeron, how can it be compared with Pentium D?

Let's talk about the performance of several of them (with the main frequency):

Celeron D, "Shining Dragon", "Pentium D", "Athlon 64

The sinking cradle said that "AMD's dual-core speed is also fast and stable, but it consumes a lot of power, the CPU is expensive, and the corresponding motherboard is also expensive" is not true.

1. Power consumption: Because the core is more advanced, AMD's power consumption is lower than that of Pentium D, and because Pentium D 8XX uses 90nm process, the power consumption is greater.

2. Motherboard: The motherboard of the Pentium D is generally more expensive than the motherboard of the AMD processor, so the high cost performance of the AMD processor is not only reflected in the fact that the AthlonX2 64 at the same price is better than the Pentium D, but also in the fact that the supporting motherboard is cheaper.

The slow stability of the Pentium series.

AMD's fast is less stable.

It's not a level, there's no comparison.

There is no comparison, Sempron 3000 low-end products. It can only be said that it is better than Seyan, but it is not as good as the Pentium 4 series. What's more, the Pentium D is dual-core.

The Pentium D is dual-core, and the Shining Dragon is single-core, and it is slower than Athlon's!

The speed of the gallop is fast and stable! , high power consumption! The CPU is cheap, change the heatsink, and the corresponding motherboard is not expensive!

There is no way to compare the Shining Dragon with the Galloping one!

AMD's dual-core is also fast and stable, but, it consumes a lot of power, the CPU is expensive, and the corresponding motherboard is also expensive.

If you have the same ** dual-core series, it will be quieter if you choose AMD!

The Pentium D is more stable, and the Sempsaurus 3000 has better overclocking performance, depending on what kind of needs you have.

Is it AM2 Sempemp 3000+? If yes, it's still 3000+, cheap and fast.

Ben D is fast, but it is not as good as Flash 3000 Power Consumption, Flash 3000 is good for game support, ** cheap.

3000+ is better, not too much how to use.

The stupid one on the first floor The flash dragon is about the same as Celeron's and the servant p4 is not as good as the one The flash dragon is a rubbish old oak

It seems to be about p4.

CD of the left and right

There is still not much data on the specifics!

You're just talking about game performance, and you don't think about anything else!!

My SP is too slow, so I can't get used to it!

It may be a mistake on the CD side!

Sempron is a low-end processor for the Ceyan AMD A64 Athlon, and the Athlons correspond to the P4

Upstairs was a joke...

The AM2 Sempron 3000 is probably a CPU around CD, and its gaming performance is much higher than that of the old P4 and Saiyang's CPUs

It's still good for Pentium, because its technology is better, and secondly, you can look at their main frequency as needed, to judge the function of the processor, and you can also measure it by ** But then again, now there is almost no difference between the products of Pentium and AMD, and the quality is still ***, depending on your preferences

What are you for?

In the past, AMD's game performance and mapping functions were better than those of the Pentium, but now it seems that the high-end CPUs of the Pentium are better than the ADM.

AMD is not bad, but the CPU is too easy to heat.

I recommend that you still use Pentium.

The Pentium is a CPU that belongs to the high-end of the Inter series, while the high-end of the AMD series is Athlon and Opteron.

So the Shining Dragon can't be compared to the Galloping one.

In fact, there is no comparison between Inter's Celeron and Pentium, let alone the two brands.

Each has its own short and long AMD's indicators in many 3D are higher than inter, but the heat dissipation is large, and it is not stable enough compared to inter, but amd**cheap meets the needs of low-end users!

It's good to watch that, watch movies and play graphics intel, and play games amd.

These two are not comparable at all.

The former is the low-end dual-core of the Core series.

The latter is the single-core Shinosaurus low-end.

If you compare the E2160 with the AMD dual-core 4000+ or something like that, it still makes sense.

Not to mention performance. In terms of stability, the Pentium is also better than AMD. AMD is mainly cheaper.

It is recommended to use 1G memory and change to a 128M AGP graphics card FX5500 or 6600GT or 9550

I guess it's not as good as P4, yes.

It is recommended to choose the Pentium 4!

After all, the frequency is high, and the cache is more than large! Sempron is AMD positioned in the low-end market, while Pentium is really Intel positioned in the high-end market back then.